DarthCraigus Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 Is there any benefit (other than the recovery time) in sending your injured players to a specialist when the option presents itself? I normally always do this if it's a first teamer purely because of the fact that the player is available for selection sooner than if left to the physio, but I was wondering if there are any other benefits to doing this for example if you choose to leave it to the physio is there a chance the treatment received by the player will be less adequate then the specialist treatment therefore leading to an increased chance of the injury recurring? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hhhonlyfan1984 Posted February 9, 2012 Share Posted February 9, 2012 i believe as in previous versions it about the speed or recovery and lowering the chance of a repeat of the injury by i maybe wrong on that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucas95 Posted February 14, 2012 Share Posted February 14, 2012 The specialist worth money but is faster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giggsidan Posted February 14, 2012 Share Posted February 14, 2012 I had a situation in my lower-league club where a reserve player who was leaving soon got an injury that could be left to the physio however it was recommended that he saw a specialist. We were BADLY in debt so I left him to the physio. Felt really guilty afterwards! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.