smellmycheese Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Defoe is on a hot streak for me: 8 goals in 7 games. He then turns in one poor performance and the fans complain that Pavlchenko should have played, who has had a fairly quite season so far. That's just daft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norville Rodgers Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Sounds like Spurs fans to me Have to say, I've noticed this too. Maybe it's the games way of suggesting you try new things, but it's galling having to listen (sort of) to the fans telling you that Curtis Davies, who's averaged 5.2 in the 3 games he has played, should have been preferred to Carlos Cuellar (one bad game after averaging over 7.5 in the first 10 games). In saying that, I dare say a fair few managers irl would recognise this as being part of the job; having to listen to the mindless opinions of ill-educated imbiciles, or "fans" as they are known. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucho Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 Exactly just like in the real football world. Fans aren't exactly rational. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llama3 Posted November 1, 2009 Share Posted November 1, 2009 i wouldnt pay much attention to the "fans would have preferred to see so-and-so playing instead" because it makes bugger all difference really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smellmycheese Posted November 1, 2009 Author Share Posted November 1, 2009 I don't think fans (even Spurs fans!) are fickle enough to get on the case of someone who's been consistently excellent for 7 games. Especially when it comes from the clubs official spokesperson. It's clear to me that this is an (albeit small) error in the game. But yeah, it makes bugger all difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.