-Jef-

And how quick would someone comment "Its your tactics mate"

That's exactly my point. It happens in real life too. It's happened multiple time to Dinamo this year. It happened to Rmad v City. I guess everyone cheats irl

AI cheats. I had 19 shots at the goal and scored only 1 goal at over 2 xg They had 3 shots and 2 goals lmfao My goalkeeper sorted the wall wrong during a free kick and then Petković scored EXACT SAME GOAL he scored versus Latvia for Croatia And then of course, Hoxha scores FIRST GOAL FOR DINAMO IN A LEAGUE Of course it happened to me And last game Lokomotiva somehow beat me when I was UNBEATEN for 15ish games and only conceded 1 goal from open play. This is ridic I lost the league title to worst Dinamo squad in 20 years The game is rigged, please fix SI

You can hover over the heart and it gives you a lot more info

Can someone explain this decision?

But I thought they did not fix anything regarding scouting? What is happening?

You also haven't responded or got back to me with my reccomendations about focuses...NICE

Iirc someone with blue name said that interest plays a part. I do agree with you on this.

Ongoing. Another thing to consider is that through my limited tests with Barca, players that will not sign (interest) or are too expensive to buy will not appear in focus.

Being stubborn is not calling out names, zeza. Maybe try what I suggested and then come to conclusions. You'll never get 90% of the database with extensive knowledge after 2 weeks in any focus.

Got me all excited I missed it somewhere

When was dynamic PA communicated as a new feature? Or you mean dynamic youth rating?

Tested scouting with Barcelona Hopped on a new save and tried finding a DM After 2 weeks the focus was filled with in progress players. Are they good enough for Barca? No. Only Rodri could replace what Busquets was doing. But is Rodri on the list? Also, no. And that is the issue I find. I find that my scouts find good number of players but Rodri is well known enough that he should be first option scouts go to when they get an assignment for a DM at Barca. Another question is, did Rodri not appear in focus because he is worth 250m and Barca has negative budget? Or did Rodri not appear because he has no interest in joining Barca? Both questions are for the devs of the game to answer but Rodri indeed has no interest in joining Barca

Did you put PA to 0 stars as well or are you just stubborn?

Put PA to 0 as well and then try again

@zeza Didn't have to wait more than a week to get in progress players for North Macedonia, Bosnia, Serbia focus

0 in progress because that focus is done. Croatia focus has 14 in progress, This is another focus that is ongoing and not finished I can check in a month if there is a change, sure

I find scouting's been improved This is top focus for right back Immediately get 8 recs and it just started This is a focus I set up 2 seasons ago but new report is below edit - another one Note: i do NOT include results found in other focuses, so there are brand new players

With that being said, this still pisses me off irrationally

Am more than happy with ME. Is it perfect? Hell no, far from it. But it's extremely enjoyable to me. Some issues I had were fixed in this round of fixes. I mean, the numbers speak for themselves FM24 (busiest year in my life), Feb 29th FM20, covid year

Because it's a non issue https://old.reddit.com/r/footballmanagergames/comments/1b32yw0/refuting_nonmetaattributes_test/

But what can SI respond to that?

But it clearly states in FAQ and 'how to' thread to put PKMs. I do not understand why it's so hard to grasp that. It's just a bunch of nonsense put together without concrete evidence and OP refused to put PKMs because everything is laid out, according to OP. I can see clearly why SI decided not to ask for PKM after he replied to another user who asked for more data before SI could probably even look at the thread. Thread was open at 14:38 and he said he will not give pkms or any data just an hour later. What is SI supposed to reply to that? Seriously asking, because I am curious what you think is appropriate response from SI? " I am not here to do all of SI's testing. I am showing them a basic test that shows some major flaws in the game currently. They can test further If they want, but I don't think you can say I have an "agenda" against SI by showing them a test that seems to show issues in their game. Get a grip. I love this game but if it has issues I would like the developers to hopefully fix them, no? " Problem is not that experiment is detailed very clearly (it's not, it is missing plenty of data relevant to how ME works) but that the EXACT settings cannot possibly be replicated.

Nor was it provided after that. Neither a save file nor nothing.

You mean the one where they decided not to send save files to see EXACTLY what was changed and how it played out? A thread that gained as much traction/comments is under review because OP provided PKM data At the top of every page is a link to how to use bug tracker it clearly says " - For match engine issues, it's useful to have as many pkm examples as possible of an issue where you can" And meta/non meta attribute mattering or not is clearly a ME issue Also steps to reproduce is not clear enough for a like-for-like reproduction of a bug