Skywalker7

I was intended to do so but my 2 pivot players can't dribble so so well or make linebreaker passes. Maybe in the future I can use Roaming Playmaker with a dribble more PI next to the my DM(d) with a more suited player.

I'm kind a new at playing with the 3 at the back systems. This is my main tactic with Frankfurt for now. Don't pay attention to the players too much they will change anyways I only have "Stay Wider" PI on RCB, LCB and both of WB's. "Roam from position" on AP and "Tackle Harder" on DM's. I thought about giving the "Stay Wider" to the AM's in order to drag them more to the half spaces rather than center but I guess they should be okay with team width on fairly wide. What are your opinions about the tactic? Do you see any critical mistake?

Most of the tactics that are created before Postecoglou's arrive was based on 4-3-3 but Tottenham has been playing 4-2-3-1 since the start of the season and doing it nicely . I wonder how can I create this kind a tactic in FM engine?

Which one is better, or is there a better one between these two in FM 23? We see in real life that manager mostly uses generic "6", "8" and "10" roles in their 4-2-3-1's and I like this style of midfield setup, so in order to create this kind a scheme; a) which role should I use to create classic 6 role in 2 cm setups? b) which role should I use to create classic 8 role in 2 dm setups? especially the 8 role in 2 dm's setups caused me many troubles because this year 4-2-3-1 with 2 dm's is kind a meta. I never saw AI using 4-2-3-1 with 2 cm's so I guess the game want us to play with 2 dm. But I couldn't manage to create the role I wanted with my DM's. generally speaking I want a B2B midfielder on my DM spot as my "the 8 role" and I tried Segundo Volante too many times for that purpose and It did not work for me. VOL plays awesome with 4-2-4's or 3-4-3's but not with the formations that has CAM. I'm wondering if you have any other suggestions or should I move to setup with 2 cm?

I see now, I'll try more creative and supportive player and role for the left wing. In that case which striker role do you suggest to use with current high-line approach?

Thank you. I have one question regarding your suggestions. If I change IF(a) to IF(s) and AF to DLP or CF, doesn't it effect the team's overall scoring threat? My main issue right now is that I can't score as much goals as I wanted. Will dropping some players goal threat be really helpful about that?

I like to use 4-2-3-1 formation and prefer to play possesion-based style of football. I'm doing this save with Atalanta and I'm struggling to create the chances I want. I'm winning enough games and I can even say I'm succesful so far in this season but not with the way I wanted. Most of the times my player's shoots inside the box just hit the oppositon center backs, and I mean most of the times It happens every 2/3 shoot attempts. I couldn't see fluid short passes, positional rotations, tiki-taka style organised attacks and line-breaking plays from my team. This is the tactic and roles that I use. I used to use "work ball into box" and "lower tempo" TI's but I started to draw regularly so I changed that. I'm open to any advices.

oh sorry. my plan was scoring mostly with through balls from Samardzic, Rodri and sometimes Lopez to Lookman and Ruiz, also I have move into channels PI for Samardzic, so he should be able to score by penatrating the spaces created by Ruiz. Also low crosses from my WB's and long shoots from Samardzic and Koopmeiners can be other options. I don't know If I have right kind a tactic for this plans but these are what I wanted to see from my team.

I have 4 players in attacking slots with 2 attack duty, I'd like to score with them I guess.

I built this squad and created this tactic in my first year with Atalanta in order to play tiki-taka style football but I have some difficulties throught my games. I can't even create lots of chances against Cremonese. I have %60-70 posession most of the time but couldn't manage to create enough to score. Any advice would be helpful.