[Boston United]

The club sometimes uses Pilgrim Way as an alternative too, as that is the road that the stadium is on. It's something a few fans tried to make the colloquial name, but alot just say "The JCS" now!

No problem, we can get it changed at the next opportunity 👍

[Boston United]

Just now, Craig_R.U.F.C said:

I would agree if something like this was time consuming to change.

The stadium sponsorship is in the game so why not stadium name? Takes longer to add in the sponsorship. Has it not been called Jackman's since 19/20 season?

When the stadium build was announced and confirmed, Jakeman's were not confirmed as title sponsors (although they did still have the naming rights for York Street, as The Jakemans Stadium). It came later, and have been the named sponsor since the first match. I guess it's similar to Arsenal, where it was originally in the database as Ashburton Grove before Emirates stepped in.

I just follow guidelines we've used for a while, and it's never come up before - thoughts @Gingerbread Man? In the meantime, you can use the editor on the PC version to rename it if you wish.

[Boston United]

Sponsor names for stadium are avoided where possible, as these can change and become out of date.

[English Premier Division Data [Discussion]]

Just now, guntz23 said:

I'd say pretty well no?

They've played Arsenal, Liverpool, Man Utd and have come out of those games with 7 points out of 9.

Spurs are currently top of the league for a reason and shouldn't be finishing outside of the top 10 places 4 times out of 5 in FM.

You've not answered the question, though. How have they performed on your FM compared to the teams they've faced IRL already.

I don't care about how well they've done IRL, we're talking FM here.

[English Premier Division Data [Discussion]]

2 hours ago, guntz23 said:

I think Tottenham are too underpowered compared to how well they're doing in real life.

I've run 5 simulations and 4 times they finished outside of the top 10.

 

 

How have they performed against the teams they've faced IRL? That's a better comparison, as IRL it's nowhere near a full season....

[Hallum Hope, fit but injured??]

IRL Hope was injured outside of football, in an attack. I imagine it is the game replicating this, however not quite rightly.

[Wrexham is very un-realistic!]

On 07/11/2022 at 10:24, juniorsquide said:

Right, and what subcategory am I being redirected to this time? As previously stated I've already been directed to post here by a staff member? Not exactly a straightforward process this Dean? At least I'm getting to deal with friendly positive people though buddy!

You should try calming down the attutude, and not acting like a spoilt brat. You might get people more willing to engage with you.

Try logging the bug in here, explaining that your club is not receiving the investment you'd expect from its "Sugar Daddy" owner - https://community.sigames.com/bugtracker/football-manager-2023-bugs-tracker/759_all-other-issues/

The process is straightforward, as many many other people seem to manage it.

[Substitutions]

The game is correct, it is 3 subs from 5 named in the National League and National League North/South.

 

[Conference North/South Georgraphy]

All depends on the new teams at step 2. In my first season, 4 southern-based teams (Boreham Wood, Torquay, Eastleigh and Wealdstone) got relegated from the Conference so it meant teams like Boreham Wood went into the North, as above. Oxford City would maybe be an option, but the database has Court Place Farm (Oxford City) as slightly further from the North Pole than Meadow Park (Boreham Wood), byt the matter of 0.11 degrees of latitude. Hemel Hempstead's round Vauxhall Road is actually inbetween those figures, so BW "wins" again...

The footprint of the North has been slowly getting closer to London for the past few years. The games bases it on the co-ordinates of the stadiums.

[Incorrect Data]

Gloucester reverted away from full-time over the summer.

[U18 Squad not using same primary trained tactic]

I was about to log this myself, been discussing this with a couple of others in the feedback thread.

 

The current situation is that if you delegate both parts of training for the U18s, then you can select their tactic in the Dev Centre. If you control either part of training (which then means you get U18s on the sidebar), it expects you to go to U18s > Tactics. However on this screen, the dropdown menu to select the tactic is inactive.

The workaround is to delegate both U18 training types, then go into the Dev Centre and select your tactic as the U18 primary tactic - then go back and take control of training.

[VAR checks on a goal from a corner.]

There is always a VAR check for goals IRL, it's standard procedure. What they maybe need in FM is just a commentary line to say "the customary VAR check is in operation... GOAL", rather than mention offside (which could still be possible if there was an attacker right in front of the keeper for example)