BajaHater

His transfer was official after our deadline.So,he is not in winter transfer window update,as many other transfers.Official database was closed when our transfer window was most active.

Unfortunately,we've got same problem as every year.Deadlines are not good for us,and official data updating is closed on 14/02/2024 and no changes after that point will be included the patch. I'll add all for next edition,wich will be FM25.

All solved except Maka,as he is no longer in our db.Thank you.

Borovina,Peranović and Sukačev are added at this point.

Yes.Tell us real % or agreed price and we will add it.In the case that club or media don't announce a price or % I can't put it just by my guess.Also,in the case we have a player who is gone outside the Serbia,not much things we can do without both sides agreed.

Because no one shown any interest to add them. Full youth teams should have only clubs who are playing youth European competitions,no every team in the league.And it's simple that we can't add all youth because in transition from U19 to first team most of them don't play more then 3rd or 4th level of our football. If you have few real talents,feel free to write their names,birthday,position,and propose marks,so we can consider their adding in db.

I've said you to propose marks for every single player where you think we need fixing. Just because you don't like how your players developing and have bad marks on your save,doesn't mean much for us,especially because your the only one with this problem.

Where are you from and what's your speciality in FM? As you know,there are a lot of people without marks,and we are really doing our best to put them for most of them.Sometimes we just rely on PA/CA until we do full scouting. So open editor,see his marks in original db,and give us your propostion,for all of them,if you want. Thank you.

It will be fixed in first update update (winter one) since with all due respect these "bugs" are far from important at this point.

I'll have a look and see if it's possible to fix that error for full game.Even they are in 3rd group of total 4 groups predicted for moving to Superliga.

Few years back there was a limit of loans,so only way to sort that out was to create Grafičar as B team.Now,when there's no limit on loans for players under21 (all Zvezda guys in Grafičar are under 20-21) I've decide to cut that. Partizan/Teleoptik and TSC/Bajša are only two teams with real B teams.

RFK Grafičar is not a B team of Crvena zvezda.During this summer I had a talk with a few people who works in the club,and all of them have the same opinion,Grafičar is not B team. -If they were B team,then Crvena zvezda wouldn't try so hard to put FSS on pressure with double registration rule. -If you have access to Comet system by FSS,you'll see that all players from Crvena zvezda in Grafičar are on loan.Same thing you can find on Crvena zvezda site when there's a text about loans. -If we put Grafičar as B team that would mean that more than 15 Grafičar players are in contract with Crvena Zvezda wich is not even close to reality. -At this point OFK Beograd in reality is more B team than Grafičar,but that's simply can't happen by many other rules and facts.