Jump to content

Nolopola

Members+
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

23 "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. In leagues where the transfer deadline is later, deals being made on the squad registration deadline should be rushed similar to transfer deadline day. For example the transfer deadline in Belgium is a week later than the squad registration deadline. So if a Premier League club signs my star player on their deadline day (which closely matches the squad registration deadline) I would want my replacement to play in Europe. But the game is like 'we still have a week, no need to rush' meaning it's basically impossible to get the replacement in time to be registered. In real life teams are aware of this and will just use the squad registration deadline as a deadline for their important tranfers. I suggest just having a system where if the squad registration deadline is before the transfer deadline the game also triggers that same rush effect you get.
  2. I'm managing KV Mechelen and was playing against Genk. One of their players went of and I noticed they replaced him with their goalkeeper. First I thought this was the bug, but then I noticed they didn't actually have any other players on the bench. When checking their squad, there were other players, just not selected. I then found out their B team played a friendly on the same day and they just made everyone except their starters and backup goalkeeper available for it... So not 100% sure if this is actually a tactics issue or more of a B team priority issue. I uploaded both a pkm and a save game from before the game.
  3. I do yes (luckily, I deleted a bunch of saves recently but it looks like it just made it....) Matthias Heymans - KRC Genk 2033.05.21.fm
  4. Yeah thought that was possibly it. Feel maybe the game should make it a bit more clear because you can't actually see those half points anywhere.
  5. So I apparently just lost out on the title to Gent on the last matchday, but I can't tell how. According to the league sorting rules, the first criterium is Half Point and the second is seeding. I should beat Gent on seeding because I was above them by multiple points at the end of the league stage. Next are games won, goal difference and goals scored. I again beat Gent in all of those. I also beat them on away record and away goals scored There is literally not a single league sorting rule where I don't beat Gent and yet they are champions The only things Gent beat me in are head-to-head and the amount of points they got in just the play-offs. But normally neither of those things should matter for the sorting... I uploaded a save after the last game and a save from right before the playoffs started. Let me know if a save from another point is needed.
  6. Just holidayed really quick in a new save until 2024 and pre-season starts on 1st July.
  7. It's only the first season so it's not the best example. But here you can see that in the March contract suggestions a player should not be renewed because he's nog good enough and then suddenly in the last week of June he should get renewed because he would benefit the affiliate (where in reality he's 3rd or 4th choice GK) I should have saves from before both recommendations, so let me know if you need any of them.
  8. When starting a new save in the JPL, the pre-season starts around June 20th, similar to when most teams started in real life. From the second season onwards however, it doesn't start until the first week of July, which is pretty late for a competition that starts in late July. You tend to only have 3 proper weeks of preparation.
  9. B-team squads always end up way bigger in the future in the game, with seemingly every single player getting renewed until they refuse to sign a new contact/get sold/find another club. I checked this in the Belgian and German leagues and compared it to the start of the game. In both leagues the teams and up with massive squads where a lot of players can't get a game (and therefore also don't develop). In Belgium (and other countries where B-teams have age restrictions) the issue is even more ridiculous as multiple players that are kept around can't even be registered as they are too old. I know that if you manage a team with a B-team the contract recommendation always says for any player who isn't good enough for the first team, that they should be renewed because it would benefit the affiliate. I assume the issue is that the AI is always applying this advice and thus renewing everyone. The problem with this is that a player who is 22 and has barely played for the B-team also gets seen as a player who the affiliate would benefit from, even if they won't contribute and will even be ineligible for the team. The save file was just a general sim to the future, so it's not the best setup to check this issue, if more data is needed I can make a save specifically to check this issue.
  10. Some things I've noticed while using Genk in the beta: - Patrik Hrosovky is should have a strong left foot (they talk about his two-footedness in this paywalled article as an example https://www.hbvl.be/cnt/dmf20220121_95888290). He is also a good ball-winner and while I do think it's down more to his mental ability than his actual tackling, his current tackling stat of 5 seems extremely low (Bilal El Khannous for example has 6 tackling). - Maarten Vandevoordt starts the game in the Jong Genk squad, when he should be first choice keeper. (I believe this was a problem in FM22 as well) - Kouassi tore his ACL in March and is still out, I don't know the exact cut-off for injuries, but it might need to be added - Arteage feels a bit overrated, he's seen as one of the best players on the team. When in reality while he's improved this season, he's still seen as a bit of a weak link - Tuur Rommens is underrated, he's supposed to be one of the better Jong Genk players and has potential to get into the first team in the future. In game he's just bad... Sam de Grand for example is already way better than him in game (De Grand might also be a bit overrated, but I cant't say for sure because my knowledge on u18 players is not that good). - Rasmus Carstensen is also overrated. He is seen as a regular starter by the game when in reality he's mostly been playing for Jong Genk and only debuted as a sub recently - Dewaest should be in the Jong Genk squad based on the fact that he played a game for them irl and is therefore ineligible for the first team - Gabriel Leveh left the club - Cuesta has really good attacking attributes for a CB. I don't know if they're empty in the db or set that way, but they should be a bit lower. He also shouldn't be a natural DM, he's covered there before, but wasn't very good, while the game sees it as his best position. - Heynen is overrated as a set-piece taker. He's average at them at best tbh. Trésor on the other hand is underrated, he's clearly the best set-piece taker at the club and the reason we're a threat from there. Also Cuesta has 11 free-kick taking, but I've never seen him take freekick before irl - Mike Tresor also has the plays short simple passes PPM, which seems inappropiate for a playmaker like him - Olivieri and Wuytens are also listed as a assistants on the club site, not just coaches. But maybe the game doesn't allow multiple assistants in Belgium, I don't know. - Peter Persoons has a 5 for analysing data as Head Analyst. I don't know much about his actual ability, but this seems really low for someone at a big Belgium club - Hans Somers has 352 as his preferred formation, but it should be a 4231 or 433. I think Jong Genk played a 352 maybe once this season, all the other times it was a 4231/433 - Jay-Dee Geussens should probably be able to play AM (or maybe DM). Because as a CM he doesn't get into the team, because they tend to play 4231DM, which has no CM. He's mostly been the most forward midfielder for Jong Genk, so AM makes the most sense. But I've seen him in a double pivot as well. - Jong Genk should be playing in the Cegeka Arena
  11. After my most recent result my team officially qualified for the Conference League and I got a message saying that certain bonusses had been paid out to clubs. Problem was, I could swear that I had only used this type of clause for Champions League qualification. When checking a previous save, from before the clauses were paid, I could indeed see that these clauses relied on Champions League qualification, not Conference League. I'm expecting to qualify for the Champions League anyways, so it's no problem, but obviously in a scenario where that wouldn't be the case, this bug can cause big financial issues when there is no Champions League money to cover the fees.
×
×
  • Create New...