Ashikodi

I started the game in a B team and after a good campaign, the first team fired the coach and I applied, yet, for the president it was like I wanted to abandon the club (B team in this case), so it seems that there is no relation between the two when it comes to Managers. There should be a natural pathway from B Team to First Team, if the B Team Manager has the reputation to get the job. The same goes to clubs with affiliations. Someone training Yokohama Marinos should be a step closer to New York City, Granada, etc, the same goes to being at Red Bul Salzburg and wanting to join RB Leipzig.

I undestand that travels means we can't train because... well, we're travelling. But, when we're going to play against a team that is 1 hour away or so, we shouldn't lose a training slot because of that. Probably there are players who live further away from their own club. This logic can go the other way as well, if for example we're playing in another continent with a 6+ hours travel (hello MLS), there should not be any slot available in the day of that trip. Now for this to happen, we should choose when to travel (and budgets should have an influence in this decision), so that we don't travel in MD-1 with no time to prepare the game.

Actually it makes sense that instead of having a limiting number of staff members, we should have a budget limitation for staff members. In real life, a lot of clubs pay X to a head coach, allowing him to bring whoever he wants within that budget.

I'm on a B team and I just applied to a job for the A team of my club. Apparently the board of the B team (which is the same as the A team) hopes I stay with the B team despite speculation I might join the first team. I don't think this makes sense.

I love this suggestion. Working on non professional teams is really not realistic regarding tranining sessions. Amateurs teams with 2 sessions, reasonable, semi professional teams should have at least 3 sessions and we should definitely choose the day of those sessions.

From what I've seen, it takes roughly the same time since you apply until you get an answer from the club, which means that if you apply to club 1, then 2 days later club 2 becomes available and you apply as well, then if club 1 makes an offer, you eather take it and lose the chance to go to club 2 or you reject it and risk don't have a club. What I suggest is that when you receive the offer from club 1, you have an option to ask for 1 or 2 days to think about it because you want to consider all the options, so that you have time to receive other offers. The club then may or may not conceive you that time, depending on the urgency and on how interested they are in you.

* Should be 'Match Review' instead of Preview in title

If we're making adjustments to face a specific opponent, we would start working on that strategy early in the week (or as soon as possible in the case of midweek games) so that we can work on the tactic familiarity as much as possible. Of course we wouldn't be focusing on opposition players' instructions but we would be focusing on in/out possession and transitions instructions and maybe players' roles. By the way, I don't know if by having a player selected in the starting XI with a specific role will make him work on that role familiarity during the week but if it doesn't, I think it should.

First of all, when you're with a National Team, you only receive the players 2 or 3 days before the match which is very unrealistic. In real life, the game is on Thursday or Friday and the players arrive at the NT on Monday (or Tuesday if their club has a game on Monday). This change would allow us to actually TRAIN in National Teams which is a BIG missing part in this game. In big tournaments (World Cups, Euros, etc.) we would have more time to prepare the team (more training sessions) and the team would be able to develop tactic familiarity. Btw, we also need perfomance analysts in NT 😒

Yes, international management is a classic feature request. Devs ignoring it is a classic consequence 😂😂😂 To those great suggestions, I'd like to add another one. Performance analysis. We can't analyse other teams. Why? We don't have perfomance analysts. And tournament dates (period from when players are available to the national teams before the upcoming match doesn't seem realistic.

Mauro Couto (Paços Ferreira) is left footed and predominantly right winger (he would be, at most, accomplished as a left winger). Information in transfermarkt and zerozero is inaccurate.

Hi there, David Pereira da Costa is a natural Left Winger (where he usually plays for Lens) and he is Right Footed (the foot he uses to take set pieces (information on transfermarkt and Instat about his strong foot is incorrect).

Portuguese National Team Staff Ricardo Santos has a Continental A License Joaquim Milheiro is the U19 Manager (shown as U20 Coach) José Guilherme is the Assistant Technical Director (shown as U19 Coach) Daniel Barreira has a Coach role on the U19s (shown as Scout) Romeu Almeida has a Continental Pro License Filipe Ramos has a Continental Pro License Telmo Silva is the U21 Performance Analyst (shows as U21 Coach) and has only a Continental B License Óscar Tojo is the U21 Sports Scientist (shows as unemployed) Filipe Romão is the women's U17 Performance Analyst (shows as U20 Coach) and has only a Continental B License Bino (former Leiria Manager) is the U20 Manager Portuguese International Players David Pereira da Costa is a natural Left Winger (where he usually plays for Lens) and he is Right Footed (information on transfermarkt and Instat about his strong foot is incorrect) Alvyn Sanches is currently a Switzerland U20 player so I assume he also has Swiss Nationality. He is Left footed.

Dynamics: Players do develop relationships between each others on national teams. We should be able to view those and it should have the same influence it has on a club. A good connection between players would help team performances. Training: I do understand that each international camp (except final phases) would have only an handful of training sessions but I might want to focus on the defensive part of the game, or defending set pieces to counter a specific opponent. Whatever the reason is, I think I would help on that regard, let alone that it would make it much more fun (it's easier to engage on FM training on a national team, because there's not much of it, than in a club where everyone, sooner or later, delegate that to some assistant). Analysis: This year version has some great analysis outputs with beautiful scatter plots giving us great perspectives on our performances, and Match Momentum analysis to see how the game really unfolded. Why on earth can't we have it on national teams? I understand that the sample is not as big and therefore, the numbers won't have a high statistical validation but it's still information and it's up to the manager knowledge to understand them and put them under perspective. Please, add the Performance Analyst to national teams. Staff: Except for the managers, everyone's working for free on a National Team. That's very unrealistic and contracts should really be added to the game. There could be clauses about exclusivity (not allowing the coach / physio / analyst (?) to work in a club at the same time) and expiration dates as well. At the moment, you see youth coachs and managers making their entire career on national teams. It is a safer environment than a club, but not that safe! These are my suggestions and I'm praying (once again) to see National Management not being ignored by the talented programers of SI in FM23 😂