Jump to content

Daveincid

Members+
  • Posts

    2,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Daveincid

  1. vor 1 Minute schrieb lied90:

    Of course you can. If you are referring to FM-Arena I have asked them questions several times about how and why they test things, I usually get a lengthy and reasonable response. Just make a forum post there and ask what you are skeptical of.

    Might do later but I would like to discuss the testings also in here:
    1. They are writing that they have tested it with 38 games to simulate a season.
    But in the screenshots provided there are 80 games played within one season in a set-up league. So what's now true?
    2. Did they took into account that in a 80 games season the player happiness may be completely different due to the high amount of games?
    3. Did they took club reputations of other teams into account?
    4. Did they took staff ratings or club ambitions into account?
    5. Did they took international call-ups into account?
    6. Did they took 100% realistic ratings for their set-up teams from A to Z?
    7. How accurate is their set-up league? Clubs may behave differently depending how important a league and how high the reputation of this league is.
    8. Did all the other teams used the exact same formation?
    9. Why did they used exact that formation?
    10. Did they added a transfer ban for the winter transfer window?
    11. Do all players speak the same language?
    12. What are their hidden attribute values?
    13. Why they didn't test it within a real existing league to remove a lot of possible knock-on issues?
    14. How do you come to the conclusion that tests for FM23 can be translated 1:1 to FM24?

    There are dozens of other questions I could ask.

    Again, my point is that people might need to accept that you won't be able to accurately "proof" anything, no matter how shiny your excel will be or how eloquent you speak trying to back up your findings. 
    I would be very careful using words like "evidence" or "proof" in that context anyway. All I could say is "I assume" or "I guess" but nothing more. 

    I'm doing a lot of editing myself and I test my stuff all the time and there is a lot of things I changed that I don't even mention in my posts because I'm not 100% certain that the effect is how I think it is. 

    So I would argue that I do have a little bit more experience as the "casual" FM user. Just with all my experience in the back I can say with confidence that those tests about moral aren't accurate at all to draw conclusions.

  2. vor 9 Minuten schrieb lied90:

    In short we can't be trusted to make conclusions based purely on our own experiences.

    But we should trust tests of people who do not programmed the game more than the programmers themselves? 
    We shouldn't questioning the methods of those tests or that you actually can't test those things with enough accuracy at all?
    We shouldn't point out that SI are the only one's who know things for sure?

    vor 12 Minuten schrieb lied90:

    We human are biased, we are blind, we see what we want to see

     I totally agree with this point but probably in another way as you meant it.

  3. Moral affects so many area's of the game.

    - Results (Good luck trying to win a title when the whole dressing room is against you)

    - Training ratings and as a result, player development (A unhappy player often gets lower training ratings which results in slower development or even regression.) 

    My advice is that before calling something an "issue" based on some (personal opinion: hillarious tests without even watched them), make your own experiences and take those "tests" with a pinch (or a whole bag) of salt.

    Usually, the own gut feeling is a better indicator anyway.

     

    Those are my 2 cents

     

  4. vor 3 Minuten schrieb Litmanen 10:

    Am I doing something wrong in the game as even with the increased realism files I hardly get any injuries in the game?

    When looking at real life teams, they tend to have at least 5 players constantly out due to injuries. With Betis we have had a massive amount of fixtures and I've also been training most of the more experienced players with double intensity and I've only had two minor injuries during two months. 

    Enjoy your luck as long as possible :D

  5. vor 2 Stunden schrieb rexx.wu:

    Because this file has been playing for a long time, so I didn't update it last month, but I'm pretty sure I didn't use any other settings. It's really strange in the transfer market. Manchester City in the fifth season didn't enter the Champions League, so they only sold but didn't buy in the transfer market. As a result, there are only 17 players left in the first team.

    屏幕截图(9).png

    屏幕截图(10).png

    As I wrote, I don't see those kind of issues. A screenshot of person XY isn't helpful either. 

  6. vor 42 Minuten schrieb rexx.wu:

    1. After playing the fourth season, I will find that the financial system of the whole game has a big problem. Many high pa or medium ca players have a large degree of depreciation. One or two million euros can buy a lot of good players.

    It may depends on your game setup. I don't remember how the game was with the December update. I definetly do not see the issue in the February update.

    vor 44 Minuten schrieb rexx.wu:

     2. The influence of the Saudi League is still too great, and the probability of famous players agreeing to the invitation is too high. However, in reality, there have been problems in the Saudi League. Players like Jordan Henderson have begun to leave. I wonder if the next update plan can be reflected in advance.

    Parts of Saudi-Arabia are hardcoded, so I can't change everything as I wish to. I do plan wider changes as soon as the final update is released.

    vor 41 Minuten schrieb BadAss88:

    Hope you're feeling better! Any idea when the public release will be?

    Not good but at least better. Plan is today or tomorrow:thup:

  7. vor 4 Stunden schrieb bowieinspace:

    Hey @Daveincid, firstly hope you're feeling better!

    I wanted to see if you had any thoughts on the games implementation of the profit and sustainability rules within the Premier League? Is this something you've tweaked with your financial changes? With the Jan transfer window so quiet due to teams supposedly running so tight on profit and sustainability rules, do you feel the game accurately represents this?

    I did tweak finances a lot + I'm planning to tweak it even more once the final update is released:thup:

  8. vor 1 Stunde schrieb klaasjan:

    Hi again.

    Today the Romanian FA have announced they're adding some rules starting from the 2024-2025 in order to improve the NT:

    Starting from season 2024-2025, teams with top 20 youth academies will be forced to use min.5 homegrown players or eligible for NT, for the entire duration of the games. For the top league min. 1 will also have to be U21. Clubs failing to do this will have to pay a fee equal with the solidarity help provided by UEFA (what the hell is this in the game?).

    The cherry on top: those fees would also be split to best 3 teams in the top league who respected those rules.

    Starting from season 2025-2026, all the teams from Liga 1 will be forced to have min.6 homegrown players, eligible for NT, for the entire duration of the games. Also min. 1 will also have to be U21. Clubs from Liga 1 failing to do this will have to pay a fee equal with the solidarity help provided by UEFA. those fees would also be split to best 3 teams in the top league who respected those rules. (Again very hard to implement this in the game.)

    Clubs not using an U21 homegrown player on the whole duration of a game are still being punished with a 0-3 loss.

    I wonder if you can implement this draconic rules for Romania in the league files, but, at least, you can safely rise the rivalry with Hungary to 20 and  also consider having us with +1 at developement factor vs Bulgaria (I have manually made it to 14 in one opf my tries to edit some things).

    no plans from my side at this point

  9. vor 21 Minuten schrieb monobloko:

    In transfer preferences, have you made any changes in Sweden?

    As in my current save, the league is filled with italian and spanish players coming on free transfers, which is EXTREMELY rare in real life, making the league almost unplayable

     

    It probably depends on your league setup. 
    For the next time: Please read the main post where and how to leave feedback, thanks

  10. vor 16 Minuten schrieb Razgriz98:

    Hi Dave! I always use your Megapack on my saves and everything works wondeful. I don't know if you are going to make a Spanish version for the realistic injuries file, but I would like to offer help on the translation if you want to do it. The only thing to translate are the added injuries and diseases. Thank you again for your great work. 

    Thanks a lot :) I do have plans to add a spanish translation but it wasn't that high on my list yet :D So help would be appreciated om that front:thup: Feel free to send me a PM with the suggested translations :)

  11. vor 57 Minuten schrieb TioPatinhax:

    is this a bug others here have noticed as well?

    It's not a bug (There is a bug with the big four clubs not having/buying enough saudi players in the future but I suppose you're referring to foreign players)

    It's down to league rules. They won't buy foreign players as soon as they reach their foreign-limit. So it depends on their current squad if they are "able" to buy players or not. 

×
×
  • Create New...