scythian12

I do wonder, what realistic transfer value can we expect of a 22yo 125 CA, 135 PA, 6030 CR, 5670 HR, 4300 WR player who has 3 years remaining on a 300k € pa contract at a 4612 rep club in a 108 (on the 200 scale) reputation league? What should the range be?

Not sure whether bug report, or feature request - but could the offside lines in the ME replays have a colour so that it could be logically deduced which one belongs to which team? Maybe using their primary kit colours or something similar?

Please read the suggestion again, more carefully this time.

I would like to have the option to have to scouting priority lists, one priority, one long-term / background. This would help with getting in quick results on focus areas (players for immediately vacant position, players just under 19 for getting them club-grown) and your 'general' background scouting of players who may be interesting, but have no such urgency in signing them. I guess recruitment focuses should in theory do this, but unfortunately they are just unusable / produce nowhere near the results what manual scouting can.

Having the option of setting highlight level pre-game. I switch it between key for run-of-the-mill and extended for important matches. Hate it that I cannot then have the important matches on extended straight away, as the highlights give early indication about how the players and the tactic is doing in general.

Also once to the US, all of them mid-July instead on the 1st

Yup, happens to me all the time as well. Seems to be for transfers where the player's contract end is not aligned with the start of his new contract. Happened three times to Brazil, this time to Norway. No messages at all in the inbox at either the contract being offered, it being accepted, no status on the player either.

I may get a stoning for this, but I imagine using a LLM (both for questions and answers) for press conferences and any hooman interactions could improve them massively.

I am not quite certain myself, but it should use the underlying 'standard' kits for kit clash calculations.

It is really tricky and easy to miss, and there is no tooltips or explanation for this, but when you change kits in the IGE, the program automatically unticks the "allow licenced kits" option when you click the pencil on the club page. If you re-allow it, the external graphics appear again for the kits. (But any changes made to the kits, e. g. the kit numbers are saved)

I had not had this issue as of yet, but I always filter in the filters menu with selecting a drop-down option, not on the pitch, may be an approach you can go with.

4-2-3-1 preferred formation and propensity to gegenpress.

Cheers; maybe some further info: the division 1 has its centres set up so that they are within the country, division 2 has them put far far away so to "stretch the cords", really put some weight on the allocation of the clubs. In the latter case it can be clearly seen under "Regional division calculation" that this works, and that the score the clubs get assigned to wonderfully match their latitude - but you still end up with the previous year's division in the "Scoring" bit, if they were on this level. The numbers for division 1, with the group centre cities within Luxembourg produce a less clear-cut picture where the numbers jump back and forth for which I have no real explanation - although on the large scale they do seem to roughly follow the latitude. However, it seems clear that the only task for here would be to include an option for regional sorting which would just take the results of the "Regional division calculation" without anything applied to it in a second step. Also it baffles me why there are two entries under the "calculation" bit, maybe have to do with two different sub-divisions? (So would be three for three subs?)