karl b Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 Scouted Salamon Rondon and i'm being told h's potentialy 3.5/4 stars which will do, individual stats aren't bad Scout Danny Graham and according to scout reports isnt as good as Rondon but when i look at individual stats Graham has better finishing, composure, team work, positioning, generally the stats i want Are individual stats a better indication of his of his use to me or what my best scouts thing a players overall potential is? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdanio Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 Neither, match performance is the key for me. The proof is in the pudding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggusD Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 Both. A worse player in terms of CA may still play better if his attribute distribution is more suited to your tactic, but in matches against high-quality teams I have found that these "overperformers" often falls through. Quality players are quality players. I never look at performances at AI clubs, since it is completely irrelevant how well or how badly they have played. A player av.r 5.80 in an AI club can easily get a 7.80 average with me, and vice versa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karl b Posted November 29, 2011 Author Share Posted November 29, 2011 So Danny Graham will do 80% of a season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.