Jump to content

Is Timewasting better than Tempo in terms of slowing down play?


Recommended Posts

If I set Tempo to 1, they still seem to get it forward pretty quick. I can't really tell the difference.

But when I put timewasting on 20, all my player dally on the ball. It's great for me. Thats exactly what I want them to do. Take their time, look for a good pass. Not just keep passing it forwards ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big example:

Usually the ball gets played to my left back in loads of space. Normally, he immeadiately plays it up the line to my AML. or passes inside to my MC. But with timewasting at 20, he just sits on the ball for about 3 seconds, draws in a midfielder, THEN he plays the ball, which is infinitely better. Creates so much more space and makes my team so much more of a threat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. you have counter attack ticked...

2. dallying on the ball is ok until they lose possession... ;)

If I am ahead and approaching 70-75 mins I tend to gradually slow down the tempo and shorten the passing whilst steadily increasing the time-wasting. I rarely ramp time-wasting up to max except for maybe stoppage time and hardly ever get to 1 in tempo/passing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...