Jump to content

Darceon

Members+
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

12 "You're a bum, Rock"

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I've been playing with a 433 that use a WB-A on 1 side and a IWB-S on the other side, which when attacking kind of forms a 2-3-5 shape with everything else involved. The main reason I went with an IWB is because both my right backs are actually quite creative and it allowed the RCM to move up higher while the W-S would keep it stretched on that side. Quick overview as to how it looks generally: PF-A IW-S W-S CM-S AP-A Anchor WB-A BPD-C CD-D IWB-S SK-S I have been thinking about perhaps making a 4231 version as I feel it might be defensively more secure at least against bigger opponents. I've only been thinking about it so far so no testing at all, but I'd like to keep using the IWB-S on the right. The only thing so far I've thought of to use is a Volante on Attack, but is that maybe overkill and is something else like a Regista perhaps a decent option too in your opinion? Potential 4231 setup: PF-A IW-S AM-S W-S Anchor Vol-A WB-A BPD-C CD-D IWB-S SK-S In terms of the 2-3-5 system in attack, this might change it quite a bit as I'm unsure how the Vol-A would play going forward, kind of same for the AM-S. On occasion I may play more with a CF-A, but that's only 1 guy, the others are more suited to a PF-A or similar, so not guys who can drop deep, meaning the AM-S won't go into that striker space as often.
×
×
  • Create New...