kurupted
-
Posts
132 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by kurupted
-
-
Hello everyone
In FM21 Full Version, there is a workaround. I can move a player from B team to sub23/19 and then move to first team.
The problem is, in FMT there is no sub23/19, so I can't really move a player from B unless to first team.
I am managing Benfica and I want to move certain players from B to first team, is that possible ?
0 -
16 horas atrás, FrazT disse:
Yes it should be possible from Manage 3D settings, programmes and select Valve ( steam ) first and then FM
I don't understand.
I opened Nvidia Control Panel
And then I selected the second option on the left (Manage 3D....)
Even If I select steam.exe, it doesn't let me to choose to NVIDIA, it is stuck at Integrated Graphics, and everytime I try to switch, that error shows up..
0 -
48 minutos atrás, FrazT disse:
What is is set to at the moment- is is automatic?
Yes. Automatic means using Integrated Graphics (Intel). Is it possible to switch to use Nvidia ?
0 -
Hello everyone!
I want to switch FM2021 to run with the dedicated graphics card (I have NVIDIA).
But when I try to change in Nvidia Control Panel, this error shows up.
The error translated:
Acess denied.
Error when aplying the settings.
---
How can I solve this ? Is this normal ?
0 -
Em 02/07/2020 em 23:34, Experienced Defender disse:
Split press (or split block) is when you leave team pressing on default and then use player instructions to tell your 3-5 most advanced players to close down more (and in some cases you can also tell them to tackle harder or/and even mark tighter). But given that you want to create a counter-attacking tactic, I guess the lighter version of split block would make more sense - with only the striker and more attack-minded CM asked to close down more). And if you want to use a split block, then you should avoid
Prevent short GKD.I just want to let you know that the tactic works pretty good! I like the football, my team plays exactly how I want them to play. Before I thought that in order to play counter-attacking football with a solid defence a low mentality was a must but with your posts and threads where you gave your opinion I realized I was doing all wrong.
Much thanks
1 -
18 minutos atrás, Experienced Defender disse:
Looks good. I mean, there is nothing wrong in this setup as such.
That really depends on your players and sometimes also on a given match/situation/opposition. The best way to figure out is to test both options and see which one suits your players better.
Thanks
Tell me one last thing.
In order to do what is called a "split-press", what do you suggest: Prevent GK Distribution or PI Mark Tighter in both wingers and striker ?
0 -
3 minutos atrás, Experienced Defender disse:
Your current midfield trio already looks good and is in line with my tactical philosophy. Of course, I don't know if your players are suited to the roles you gave them in terms of attributes. But if they are, then the setup should be okay.
In this particular case, I would prefer the mezzala (on the different duty from his wide forward partner). But only if you have a player that can play the role effectively. In fact, if he can play as an AP on attack duty, then he should definitely be able to play as a mezzala as well
This is my current setup.
DLF-A
IW-A IF-S
MEZZ-S DLP-S
HB-D
WB-S CD-D CD-D FB-A
Positive
Short Passes
Build from the back
High tempo (I think this works but I was wondering if Normal is better)
-----------
Distribuite Quickly
Counter-attack
Regroup (I think in some games this should be removed)
--------------
Lower LOE (Again, in some games where I should win this can be removed)
I will test this.
0 -
1 minuto atrás, Experienced Defender disse:
I haven't experimented with that particular approach, but you can test it and see how it works and whether or not it produces the football you want to see from your team
I will.
Another thing, what roles in the midfield do you suggest ?
From other posts I noticed a "pattern", a defensive minded midfielder, a holder and then a runner, but since both of my wingers cut inside what kind of midfielder (runner) can I use ? Mezzala ? CM-A ?
0 -
1 hora atrás, crusadertsar disse:
If your players can play as IW or IF then of course they can play as wingers as long as you put them on the same side as their dominant foot. Don't be fooled by the little green circle. It's pointless.
Yeah, I know, but it's because of the attributes. The IF has 12 in crossing but 14 in finishing. I have 2 players than can play as wingers on the right side but that means I need to play with one of the best players (the IF) as Winger on the other side, altough he has a trait that says he cuts inside from both flanks, but he doesn't have a good right foot, so, that's a problem.
Let's assume that I want to create a tactic where both wingers cut inside, is there a way to balance the midfield with 1 holder and one runner without this midfielder get in the way of the wingers ? The big problem I see in this setup is the lack of "explosion", the lack of intensity, I don't see many movement of my players, frequently the CB's bomb the ball forward, the fullbacks do this too, and I want them to play a mixed style of passing, play short when to build and when it's the best choice but play more incisive in the last third of the field
0 -
42 minutos atrás, Experienced Defender disse:
The tactic looks like a good starting point for a counter-attacking style of football. I personally would prefer a winger in AMR instead of IF and perhaps a BWM instead of carrilero to help you be more decisive in winning the ball, but those are just nuances.
Instructions-wise, I would replace the
tight markingwith get stuck in.The rest of TIs are more or less okay, so potential tweaks will have to be based on what you will observe while testing the tactic. I don't know your players, so it's hard to offer more specific advice. Not sure why have you opted to Play out of defence though?
But anyway, you seem very close to having a nicely balanced counter-attacking tactic
Hello!
I saw many of your threads and based on much of the tactics that you created to help the OP's I got some ideas of what team instructions a CA tactic should have.
I understand what you say about the Winger role but I do not have pure wingers, at least good wingers, my best players are IF/IW so yeah...
The build from the back TI that I choosed was to reinforce that idea of mine of be willing to let the opposition play but when I have the ball, I want to have good footbal with not much direct passes but not posession based aswell, and I used the higher tempo for that precise reason.
Altough I think I was tempted to use Positive mentality since I have fairly good players for a mid-table club but that could be too risky.
The thing that bothers me a bit is the lack of "intensity" of my offensive play. Sometimes I see too many balls going direct from the midfield/defenders/fullbacks and thats not what I want to see, I do not want to restrict my players to only play short or feet to feet but I want them to play a mixed style passing, combined with higher tempo, and since i'm using balanced mentality I think the pass directness is not too much.
I thought for a second, but I didn't see you mention this is any thread, what do you think about give the "Play Shorter Passes" to the CD/FB/DM and to the rest of the players more direct passes ?
0 -
Hello.
I created a 4141 tactic for a mid-table team. What I want with this is to play fast, incisive football, I do not want to pass around, I do not want some kind of possession football. I designed this tactic so I can defend properly and be incisive with the ball. My tactic has flaws, I'm most certain there are some tweaks that should be made to become a good tactic, so I'm counting on you to spot the weaknesses in my setup. My team overall is well balanced, has some good players and I think I can do more than just defend and wait for CA, I think besides from the willingness to let the opposition play I can play fast and entertaining football with this team, so I don't think a more direct approach would be well suited in my team.
@Experienced Defender I did some intensive research and I saw probably 90% of tatical help threads where you contributed
You know how to build a balanced tactic and you understand the logic behind tactic creation, so, If isn't asking too much, I would love to have you commenting this tactic.
PF-A
IW-S IF-S
CAR-S AP-A
DM-D
FB-A CB-D CB-D FB-S
GK-D
Instructions:
Mentality Balanced
Play from the back
High Tempo
------------------
Counter-attack
Distribute quickly
-------------------
Lower LOE
Tight Marking
0 -
3 horas atrás, Hilly1979 disse:
A CM on attack will not necessarily attack the same spot as a inside forward on attack,that would be an attacking Mezz who attacks the channels.
Nothing wrong with that combination in my opinion, in that formation you do need attacking penetration from the midfield.
What do you think about this.
Changing DLF-S to DLF-A
Changing IF-A to IF-SChanging WB-S to WB-A
0 -
Hello everyone!
So, i'm currently managing a mid-table club in the Portuguese League.
I have good players, technically, with good mentals and I want to play defensively solid with incisive with the ball. I created a setup, but I think it's not perfect, I appreciated if anyone could help me make this tactic better overall.
0 -
3 horas atrás, Ronaldinho Gaúcho 10 disse:
Looks like none of your CMs will provide sufficient support runs on the counter, I’d change the “CAR” role into a MEZ-A or something similar that will help in that regard. If you want to play a counter-attack style you need enough players quickly running forward soon as you get the ball. Hope the next change will help you achieve that. Gl
Hello!
I choosed the Carrilero because I wanted to have some defensive cover. My left fullback will be a thunder lighting in that flank leaving it exposed. I have thought for a Mezzala yes, but on the right side. Instead of player a AP I really tought about playing a Mezzala, but what I think is that if I play a Mezzala in that kind of midfield I will lose what i want most: defensive stability.
Look, my season is going pretty ok, so far no loss, I think my tactic is balanced, I can create goals now, good chances and I have the defensive stability. I think I found the "perfect" setup for my team. What I think is that my right wingback is not very good to play such an agressive role in a positive mentality, but so far I didn't had any problems!
Ty for your help and everyones help
And sorry for my bad english
0 -
This is my new setup ? Looks good ?
Still, I don't score that many goals or create many chances altough I have good players in comparison to the other teams
0 -
23 minutos atrás, Ronaldinho Gaúcho 10 disse:
Both of my best wingers are Inside Forwards, so I would expect them to score most of the goals, but I don't want to rely on their long shots to score goals. I want to have a team that his defensively solid and works as a unit. A team that will be incisive.
My midfielder in fact are very well rounded. I have one that he is the BBM that he is very good, he can play in almost every midfield role, the others are more attack minded, they can play Mezzala, AP or even CM-A; the other midfielders are good defensive midfielder.
The problem is, I don't feel that my team is solid. Because what often i see is that, when the ball reaches my wingers it's almost like a curtain being closed in the theatre, when the ball reaches them they do what they want, shoot or whatever and the play ends there, almost with a long shot or a bad pass, sometimes they can score great goals, but I wan't more solid play, because I know I have good players to play that style, this team is not the best in the league, In my opinion there are no best teams in this second league, every team has very good players.
0 -
1 hora atrás, Ronaldinho Gaúcho 10 disse:
@kurupted how’s it playing out for you? aren’t the BBM and the AP getting in the way of the IFs?
In fact there are some games that I can indeed play good football. What I see is, my games is player by my IF's who can go for a shot or pass and my wingbacks who can play wide and go for a cross.
What do you suggest for midfield roles ?
0 -
14 minutos atrás, Ronaldinho Gaúcho 10 disse:
then it’s a question of improving those players that miss those 1on1s either training or signing/loaning a player who will do it better. are you near a transfer window soon?
No dolla dolla ahahahah
So, this is my "refined" tactic, what do you think now ?
0 -
1 hora atrás, Ronaldinho Gaúcho 10 disse:
If you really want your Wingers moving in and you want to play a low line and counter. Maybe try a 4-4-2 DM or similar 2CM formation where One of the strikers operates centrally and the other drags players wide on and off the ball. Give your team more variety of movement when going forward, since you want to play counter fast players/players who can play accurate killer balls will help.
Just an idea...Yeah, but I don't have strikers who can fit in that style of play. I have only 1 striker and he is not very good, as I said, my main goal threat are my Inside Forwards who have good mentals and technicals. When I created that setup I want to envolve my fullbacks and Wingers since they are good.
I think my setup is not unbalanced at all, some of the games I don't win because my players miss constantly ridiculous 1x1 and some chances that they should hit the back of the net, but this is it, low league has this things.
Since my wingers are going to go inside I didn't want my midfield to get close to them, I changed 1 midfielder to BBM and the other to an AP-A. The left winger is not an IF-S and the left fullback (hes my best fullback) he is a WB-A, on the right side my right winger is an IF-A since he his my best winger and the fullback of that side is a WB-S, since he can go forward but I don't trust him to give him such freedom to go up and down that flank and fullfil his defensive duties.
0 -
1 hora atrás, Robson 07 disse:
In possession the whole thing just looks too centralised. A no.9 down the middle, two wide forward cutting in, a central midfielder attacking up the middle and you have narrowed your attacking formation. It just seems to me that if the opposition defends a little deep, narrow and compact - a habit the AI often has - then your lack of variety will become a frustration. i realise you have released one full back forward but alone I'm not sure he will be enough.
If you change the that midfielder to a playmaker you may prevent both players in the same zones but you are still going to be overly reliant on central play. Thats just my take.
I changed my left wingack into support and the right to a fullback on support. I changed the MC-A into a BBM and I kept the roles for the 2 wingers.
Look, my best players are in the wings, both of my wingers have decent finish and they can be a goal threat, with my fullbacks I think I can do some wing play while a BBM can overcrowd too the central areas.
What more suggestions you can give ?
0 -
42 minutos atrás, Robson 07 disse:
If you literally put arrows on players (like you once could) aren't the right winger and the attacking central mid both headed for the same space?
And a question for you, Why have you chosen to attack narrow and defend wide? Plus why have you dropped the line of engagement?
What do you suggest ? Change the MC-A to an AP-S maybe ? I wanted the MC to arrive later in the area. Both of the IF's stay on the edge of the opposite box. But If i switch the MC-A to an AP it won't be a problem to use 2 playmakers in this kind of setup ?
I defend wide because my center backs are not very good physically, they don't have good impulsion and most of the crosses that are made into my area I think that my center backs will lose more headers than they should win, thats why I wanted to my fullbacks stay wider and stop that crosses.
I dropped the line of engagement because I want to be compact. I didn't want to change the defensive line because I don't want to be very passive because that can lead to many longshots that will probably hit the back of the net.
What role you suggest to the MC-A ? Both of players that I use in that role they can perform AP-S too.
0 -
Hello guys! (sorry for bad english)
So, I started a save with a team from the second league of Portugal, Académico de Viseu
First of all, expectations are mid table. One thing that I found in this league is that, all teams have pretty decent squads, I can't say that 1 particular team has a very very good team, I think every team has strong players and weak players, it's a well balanced league.
I will start to talk about my team.
Both of AML/R, good finishing, the AML has very good pace and the AMR has a little less pace but good mentals and high finishing.
My midfielder is very good too, my DLP-S has very good mentals and technical attributes.
My defensive midfielder is pretty decent too. My left back is a good ofensive fullback very well rounded but the right fullback is a little weak, clearly this is the weak point in my team.
My other midfielder has very good techicals, not soo much mentals but he is average, I got him from a team from the first league.
What I want ? I want a solid tactic, well balanced, that can score goals but be very solid at the back. I don't want to score 20 goals if I suffer 21. I want a tactic that is not as much offensive nor defensive.
So, this is what I tought when I created this tactic.
My AF pretty standard, a well-rounded player, good pace, good finishing.
Both of my wingers have the opposite foot, my left winger has slightly less finishing but he has 17 pace, so I wanted him to carry the counter-attacks, I even let him join the AF in defensive corners. My right wingers has very good technicals and mentals, good finishing, good dribble and off the ball, he is clearly the goal threat.
One thing I was wondering. My left winger is not much of a goal threat like my right winger, so I tried to use my right winger as IF-A to let him close to the goal and sometimes I use my left winger as Inverted Winger, what do you think guys ?
So, my midfielder, I think is pretty standard, a Anchor Man to give cover to the my defence, a DLP-S, the DLP is the best player in my team, he is 32, he has very good technical and mentals, perfect to dictate the game and be a ball-magnet. My CM-A I wanted him to act like a box to box, he can defend but he will also attack the opposite box when chance presents.
My fullbacks. My left fullback is much better than my right fullback, he can play FB-A, WB-A with no problems, but as I said, I want to play a balanced tactic so I used FB-A, so he can provide more defensive help, the same way to the right fullback, he is not very good techincally so I didn't want to be as much further in the pitch.
Talking about instructions. So, I want to play more direct because I think I don't have a very creative team, I didn't want to play a possession game because I don't have the players with high creativity or mentals, I think its not good to play possession if I don't have the players who can pull that amazing pass or discover a mate in a running behind the defence. I wanted to be more disciplined and high tempo because I believe that If I don't have the ball I can't commit mistakes, so I wanted to chase goal as much fast and more incisive than slow tempo.
Remind: I want to create a good solid tatic, with a solid defence but who can score goals.
I will post now the tactic.
What do you guys think ? Anything you would change ?
0 -
13 minutos atrás, summatsupeer disse:
Sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it.
If your sitting deep, how are you getting the ball back to have lots of possession?
If your counter attacking as much as possible, how are you keeping possession?
Sure you can play a low mentality but that tends to be a bit more of a "keep ball" possession style since its low risk and you won't have a fast counter attacking style except for when the game triggers one due to opponents over-committing.
If you press super high and aggressively and want to attack fast rather than working the ball around (think Liverpool) you might come up against some issues and struggle to break teams down, even they have refined there style to be a bit less aggressive but more effective.
Well, I think counter-attack doesn't mean to just soak pressure and attack. I think you can counter-attack by recovering the ball in the defensive phase. You can have an offensive mentality with attacking football and still counter-attack, the problem is, get things right
0 -
Hello,
As the title suggests, is it realy possible to play an offensive style while keeping the defence tight and counter-attacking as much as possible ? Do you guys suggest using a lower mentality with attack duty's up front ?
When i search in the forum for counter-attacks most of the people tend to look to a defensive tactic that soaks the pressure and eventually counter-attacks, what I want is to have a tactic that dominates with offensive football but with fast counter-attacks
0
You know how to build a balanced tactic and you understand the logic behind tactic creation, so, If isn't asking too much, I would love to have you commenting this tactic.
FMT21 - Can't move players from B team to first team
in Bugs Found on PC/Mac
Posted
É incrível como é que um jogo que já saiu da versão beta e já teve mais do que 1 atualização ainda tem bugs merdosos como estes. Digo-te já, comprei-o no beta e arrependo-me totalmente. Este FM está cada vez mais vergonhoso, este tipo de bugs admitia-se à 10 anos atrás mas não hoje. E atenção que esta merda já não é de agora, no Beta já acontecia, e desde então ainda nem sequer se dignaram a tratar disto fds