kkas Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 Firstly how many people actually use these when offering a contract because I have never had a contract turned down because I offered no signing on fee I was just wondering if there is any proof that it makes a difference say if two clubs were bidding for the same player and one offered a signing on fee and the other didnt? Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cityull Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 I never offer them either unless I really want someone but as you say theres no proof that it makes any difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
uppercut Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 i only offer a signing on fee when offering less than what the player demands, whether it makes any actual difference, i dont know! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baker.simon Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 I never offer signing on fees unless its required, you know, where it says x player wants this that and that. Ive not seen it included as a clause so therefore never offer one, its worked every time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalimyr Posted February 21, 2009 Share Posted February 21, 2009 I never offer them either unless I really want someone but as you say theres no proof that it makes any difference.It certainly used to make a difference, but it doesn't appear to any more. In FM05 or something I once messed around and had the likes of Ruud van Nistelrooy and Michael Owen playing for some conference team, all of them on £5 a week, because I'd frozen my money and offered them each a £2b signing on fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.