Jump to content

can i make this tactic to a 5 channel attack?


Recommended Posts

On each side two wingers, two mezzalas and for the forward maybe a false nine. Or two inside forward behind two wingback with overload the flanks. Or a winger on his side a mezzala, behind them a inverted wingback. The other flank, an inverted winger, a deep lying playmaker on support behind, a wing back.

It's just theory of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attacking 5 channels is very much possible in a 4-3-3, but there are many different ways to do so, and I think of it as a 3 questions to answer.

1. There's the 5 behind that matter: you must decide whether you want a 3-2-5 or a 2-3-5. 4-3-3s in FM shift more easily to 2-3-5

2. Which players will make up the front 5? This bit is the most diverse section. Most in style is 2 wide wingers with two aggressive 8s. But you can accomplish a front 5 with attacking fullbacks and inverted wingers, or one inverted fullback and one attacking one (known as the "steering wheel."

3. How will you penetrate space? (ie. who is on support and who is on attack?) Sometimes you might want a halfspace player to make surging runs beyond the defence to make space for your winger. Sometimes you might want winger who runs in behind to make space for your 8. Adjust roles, duties, and traits according to the skills of your players

In your case, I would do a 2-3-5, with Sanchez on FB-S, Ruben Garcia on IW-A with stay narrower and Abde with IW-S/W-S and stay wider. That's a fast way to do it without changing much. Perhaps some things to tinker with in terms of roles are pushing Pena to attack, Moncayola to defend, the 9 to DLF-S and one of your CBs to BPD.

Edited by The3points
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, arik.ev said:

can we use a 433 to attack all 5 channels?

 

Screenshot (124).png

Add width to go after the channels.

DLP(s) in a 4-3-3 as an 8 will be an issue. Either switch to a 4-2-3-1 or move him to a role that doesn't hold. This current setup looks like a high lines approach rather than a midblock. 

Edited by Cloud9
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...