Just looking at an analyst report for the below player, and it says that he's underperformed his xG by 5.01, but if you actually look at the xG (4.99) and G data (10 goals), he's outperformed his xG by 5.01, not underperformed. Is the analyst report therefore reading xG incorrectly?
0
Recommended Comments
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now