Jump to content
  • board unhappy about finances in a deal they were responsible for


    oohlala111
    • Public Status: Under Review Files Uploaded: None
     Share

    I don't have the specific news item where the board agreed to sign Haaland, but they took control of it and signed him for £96m on £220k a week. However, according to the latest monthly review, they're unhappy with the finances involved? It was you who signed him in the first place!

    image.png.e59e6f313c1821c48ce9d2d89e1f8256.png

    image.png.8cee2bf31dc9ceea58dd01aa3f18ce54.png

    I've uploaded the save file 'board unhappy with haaland' to the cloud.

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Furthermore, the board are also disappointed with the playing time Haaland has received. However, he has appeared in every single game since he signed?

    image.png.3be91ce3b95dc1b4ea540278adc83ae6.png

    image.png.6f2adcda4cdabf52be0b95692436947e.png

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...