Altinordu "All Turkish player" requirement after takeover

Thanks.

I don't believe this to be an issue. 

The strategy to use only Turkish players is one that the current club owner imposes.

If he sells the club and departs, there is no reason to expect a new ownership will continue the strategy.  They may, or they may not depending on their own preferences.

I would agree if it would be an outside takeover, but an inside takeover is strange to me.

It is still a different person, and there are many examples in football where ownership dynamics (or even just the chairperson) changes within the group and it signals a turn in a new direction. 

I have started a similar save and am interested in how to manage this.

In terms of takeovers, are you able to confirm if a proposed takeover has a pre-determined outcome (ie. successful or not) from the moment it is first "in the media", or if this can change randomly as "negotiations" take place? I'm thinking that I can use regular autosaves and if I know the answer to this, I can potentially avert takeovers that might change the club vision that I like. I also if there is a timeline when takeover approaches will happen if they randomly occur/

Many thanks

Same just happened to me after four seasons with Altinordu. Very frustrating

On 22/11/2023 at 02:00, smythy_17 said:

I have started a similar save and am interested in how to manage this.

In terms of takeovers, are you able to confirm if a proposed takeover has a pre-determined outcome (ie. successful or not) from the moment it is first "in the media", or if this can change randomly as "negotiations" take place? I'm thinking that I can use regular autosaves and if I know the answer to this, I can potentially avert takeovers that might change the club vision that I like. I also if there is a timeline when takeover approaches will happen if they randomly occur/

Many thanks

The way we had requested this was that the new club owner would make a decision to continue the policy or to abandon it.

I am not aware of any instances where the policy continues after a change at the top, though that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.  Just that nobody has reported it. 

This may certainly need some tweaking if abandonment of the policy happens every time.  I'll log something regarding this and hopefully the developers can take a look under the hood.

Edited December 3, 2023 by perpetua