Team record and team name.

Hahaha. Wikipedia > Justice, right? There's everything okay with this, if you go to the club name, you'll see it is Clubul Sportiv al Armatei Steaua, and the short name is Steaua Bucuresti, as we all know it. And regarding the honours, Steaua has the 21 titles and the UCL, Fotbal Club Fcsb has the honors after 2003, as stated by the Court of Appeal Bucharest.

There is nothing wrong in the game regarding the real life situation with FCSB and CSA Steaua.

Edited October 26, 2022 by Aditza

On 26/10/2022 at 01:22, cristi4077 said:

Hahaha. Wikipedia > Justice, right? There's everything okay with this, if you go to the club name, you'll see it is Clubul Sportiv al Armatei Steaua, and the short name is Steaua Bucuresti, as we all know it. And regarding the honours, Steaua has the 21 titles and the UCL, Fotbal Club Fcsb has the honors after 2003, as stated by the Court of Appeal Bucharest.

Who is "all know"?  There is no such team in second division, it is just CSA Steaua, if you want the abbreviation. You don't like the team name? Sad.

https://lpf2.ro/liga2/

What do you say about UEFA, LPF and FRF, they also say the same thing, not just Wikipedia. About the justice you invoked, the lawsuits are still being judged. Until there is a definitive decision, stop eating ****.

 

The trial for who owns the trophies is going to be rejudged so previous decision that gave the trophies from 1947 to 1998 to CSA is null and should not be taken in consideration according to the law.

Therefore until a new trial takes place a a decision is made, the historical record should go back to FCSB as there is no decision by the law that CSA owns any records

 

please update accordingly for FM 24

 

https://www.gsp.ro/fotbal/liga-1/fcsb-csa-steaua-proces-palmares-inalta-curte-692480.html