Aquaplex Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Quick question. I'm confused about player roles vs. position/tactic role. For example, if my central defender is best suited as playing limited defender with defend duty, but in my backline it's preferable that i play as cover/stopper combo, how do i go about resolving this problem? Do i play my player at his best suited role or do i ignore his best role for the suitability of the tactic. Thank You for any info you may be able to provide me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedore Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 Thats the problem with management. Youve described the two possible ways of picking a team - players to fit a formation, or a formation to fit the players. Its just whatever you feel comfortable with/ will win you the most games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aquaplex Posted May 5, 2010 Author Share Posted May 5, 2010 Ya, but if i put all my players in their "prefered" roles/duties then i'm affraid my tactic/formation is going to be out of whack. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertcornell68 Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 Ya, but if i put all my players in their "prefered" roles/duties then i'm affraid my tactic/formation is going to be out of whack. That's pretty much the core dilemma of the game. I try to have my BEST players in roles that exploit them, then build the rest of the team around that, with a strong bias towards 4-3-3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.