mcleod_69_69_69 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 When declaring that an opposition player is the weakest link in your upcoming game. Is it better to target their worst form over 5 games or their best defender. Because in the past, I have targeted the worst form players and the next game they were dropped. Coincidence? A wise man said there is no such thing as coincidence, only the illusion of coincidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevie_G_32201 Posted August 30, 2011 Share Posted August 30, 2011 I target players with low morale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcleod_69_69_69 Posted August 31, 2011 Author Share Posted August 31, 2011 OK so I target a player who I believe is going to be a threat, He has a good run of form, last 5 games, 7.13 and 3 goals. When I say I think he could pose a threat I am dismissed. This has happened a few times, then I get some d***head who used to play for the club telling me a striker who isn't a first team regular, who has only a few goals and a crap average rating, that he is in fact my main threat. A guy who will probably not even play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shake Appeal Posted August 31, 2011 Share Posted August 31, 2011 I target players with low morale. I only really bother if they're 'Good/Okay/Poor'; if they're already 'Very Poor', I don't feel I'm getting as much confidence-banging for my buck. And I try to target players with poor determination or 'bad' personalities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.