Sheddy Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 I have scoured this board and others on the forum and offer teh below as a consensus of what I have read: 1) Tactics require too much tweaking all the time to counteract the opposition. Yet the opposition seem able to counteract your set tactics. In other words too much focus on stopping the opposition. 2) CPU teams are too efficient at set plays and get awarded a large number of them, whether they are free kicks in dangerous areas, corners and penalties, even when defenders are not set to "hard" tackling. 3) Defenders in general seem unable to defend, yet the CPU team can. Simple tackles, headers, clearance or not made; Defenders back off inexplicably, shoot out of the defensive line inexplicably, don't close down, don't tackle and don't mark. This seems to be the consensus from my reading. User teams seem to be at some kind of disadvantage while the CPU teams have our team sussed out easily irrlevant of abilitites of players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 You sire have the myopia of a true football manager! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheddy Posted November 4, 2009 Author Share Posted November 4, 2009 You sire have the myopia of a true football manager! Lol...not at all this is from experience of the game to date and reading through on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.