Jump to content

janeka

Members
  • Posts

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by janeka

  1. An AM(S) will contribute far less offensively than your Trequartista will. An AM(S) can be quite static, could potentially blunt the effectiveness of the BBM. I would keep Barkley in a creative role.

    Thanks llama3. Until now things are working good. Middle of November, 3rd in the league, 1 point behind MU, who's first. I struggle a litle play away from home, have to improve in that part. At home, it's easy, teams just stay deep, if I can't break them, around 60 minute I start to invite them to into my own half and until now it's working.

  2. A BBM is the most attacking type of role for that position and system that is appropriate. However, look at your split of duties - 4 attack duties in your most advanced players - your full backs are both support duties - a big risk of having an isolated set of halves for the team. Getting either Baines or Coleman overlapping will be useful if you feel your movement is too static, or the space isn't opening up.

    I've been watching all the matches in comprehensive to see in more detail what's happening on the pitch, and until now I'm very happy with all positions, especially the BBM, McCarthy is a beast. The only position that is a litle bit irregular is AMC, especially against teams who seat really deep. Any sugestions? I changed already to AM(S) with PI "Roam From Position". Ross Barkley he's very young, so the irregularaty could be because of that, just like Deulofeu.

×
×
  • Create New...