'It is harder to improve ATT attributes for attacking players because for attacking players the ATT attributes have higher weighting coefficients than for defensive players and therefore require higher amounts of CA for improvement.'
This, to me, is illogical and counter-intuitive. Doesn't this mean that a defender could potentially become much better at attacking and shooting than a striker? I would have guessed that a striker is a striker precisely because he has a knack for attacking and shooting, and thus would have an easier time training these things than the other way round. If this is the case, would it not be possible to hack this and train a very young defender as a striker and then training him for that position?
What about players that are natural in several positions, is it more difficult for them to train things in general because they have the penalties from several positions, or is it beneficial because the coefficients are averaged for all the players positions?
SFraser's Training Schedules for FM10
in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
Posted
What about players that are natural in several positions, is it more difficult for them to train things in general because they have the penalties from several positions, or is it beneficial because the coefficients are averaged for all the players positions?