It also doesn't seem right for the difference between a player having an average season (averaging 6.8) to a player having a great season (averaging 7.2) to be so minimal when you are using a scale of 0-10. If an average season for a player is 6.8, a top performing player should be averaging at least 7.5 or above as in previous iterations of the game. Such a small gap doesn't leave much room for spread of ratings either, as all players will likely be confined within .6 or .7 of each other