Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 "What we've got here is a failure to communicate"

About Gastofm

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hello good day. This pack is very good, it makes the game much more complete! In the section "A Bit Better Manager Tactics", you could if you want to talk to the "FMtrendgames" to make the managers more realistic and complete in terms of tactics. They perform real managerial tactics in the game, and they do it very well. The truth is that it would be great if they could translate these tactics into the database. This is the page: fmtrendgames.com/tactics/fm21-tactics/ Greetings and have a nice day!
  2. Good Morning. In this topic I come to propose new roles that could be added to the next game in the saga, Football Manager 2021. Two of the three roles already exist but would only be added in new positions. And those three roles are: "Raumdeuter" (Position: "AMC"), "Wide Midfielder" (Position: "MCL" and "MCR"), and the new one for the positions "DCR" and "DCL". Reasons: -Raumdeuter: He named this role as this season we saw Thomas Müller play in the "AMC" position. As we already know, the role of Thomas Müller is indecipherable, and this season is no exception. -Wide M
  3. Even so, with a 4-2-3-1, the offensive tactic of the named example could not be carried out. Laimer playing "Shuttler" or "Mezzala", does not generate the amplitude that is needed.
  4. For example, Maurizio Sarri also established a defensive formation. It started from a 4-3-3 or 4-3-1-2 but defensively it was a 4-4-2.
  5. A particular case to explain my request is yesterday's game between RB Leipzig vs Atlético Madrid. Julian Nagelsmann proposed a "3-3-3-1" (3-1-5-1 / 2-2-5-1 in attack) in which the "Wingbacks" (Angeliño and Laimer) became wingers who proposed amplitude to the attack, while the "Wingers" closed to generate numerical superiority in the center of the field, as if they were "false Attacking Midfielders". That currently in the FM20 can be done. Now, the problem lies in this point: RB Leipzig in defense changed to a "4-2-3-1", in which one of his "Wingbacks", Laimer, became a "Midfielder De
  6. Okay. In other words, the "Standard" varies from mentality. A "balanced" mentality is going to be an average between width and center, and the more offensive it is, the more it opens up, and the more defensive it is, the narrower it is. True?
  7. This option appears in the "Attacking Width", "Passing directness", "Tempo" and "Defensive width" section. I really don't understand the meaning of the word in the game.
  8. I watched. I am playing in an "Extremely Wide" attacking width. Bernardo Silva has the specific task of "Sit Narrower", and Joao Cancelo of "Stay Wider" (he is a "Complete Wingback Support"
  9. Excuse me, I used the wrong terms. I mean, for example, an "Winger" tasked with "Stay Wider" on an attack width "Wide", will it open the same as in a "Standard" or "Narrow" width?
  10. I mean is that you are telling the player to try to stay open and not to be more closed so as not to waste the width of the field, because if he does not select any, the player will close if he wants. But there is another doubt. If I ask a player to open or close, how much will he do? I don't think it's the same thing, telling a player in a "Standard" width to open, as opposed to a "narrow" width.
  11. I'm trying to capture Guardiola's 4-3-3 taking advantage of the entire playing field, with "inverted wingbacks" and "inverted wingers" to create spaces both on the wing and in the center. Here I played a 4-2-3-1 because I didn't have the right players for 4-3-3, so I used a double pivot and instead of two reverse lanes, I put one in that role and a "Complete Wingback " For example, I gave Bernardo Silva the individual task of trying to close (in a very high width ") to leave the lane for Joao Cancelo. The interesting thing is that the ends cut inwards, which generates a compact team
  12. Oh tell me if I understood correctly. Are you saying that this is a way to encourage the individual player to stay with the band (and not plan to close) based on the collective width? And if for example it is narrow, the individual idea would be to tell them "try to close" to meet the collective width?
  13. I have a lot of doubts about the width in the attack because I don't know if the individual task of a specific player can change the collective width. For example, the attack width is "extremely high" and I frame a specific player as "sit narrower". Does it mean that all but that player will remain opened? And if instead, I individually mark one that "stay wider" is going to leave the field hahaha? I don't understand why those two options exist, if, for example, in the case of setbacks / flaps in the "stay wider" part, it says they will open up to the sideline (ie take advantage of the whole f
  • Create New...