zindrinho
-
Posts
452 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Articles
FAQs
Online Manual
Support: Blocks
Support: Games
Bug Tracker
SIGames Manual (beta)
Profiles
Posts posted by zindrinho
-
-
5 hours ago, XaW said:
The only "allowed" reason is if the family moves for "non-footballing reasons" and the clubs exploit this by getting a parent hired.
This.
Its been like this for a pretty long time, Martin Ødegaard comes to mind when Real Madrid hired his dad as a youth coach, who, AFAIK didn't speak a word spanish at the time. This was back in 2015.
1 -
10 minutes ago, DarJ said:
You do realise that issues like this even if they are fixed, if you started a save before the patch it will take some time to adjust
The conspiracy theory was that SI includes game breaking mechanisms into FM on purpose so you will buy the next edition as well.
Think you need more than a patch to adjust that kinda thought..
1 -
39 minutes ago, Bielsa1975 said:
The game always favour the AI teams but speak out about it on here you get post removed or people like you defending it .
You still on about that nonsense? After refusing to answer or even aknowledge this obvious question:
On 27/11/2022 at 06:41, jcp1417 said:Your logic is severely flawed. Why would SI program the game to "differentiate between human and AI players" if they had to lie in order to "sell the game"? You make no sense.
0 -
1 hour ago, Ron Wandle said:
So either the players' unhappiness about squad depth is based on what tactics are played,
this, yes, its what I've been trying to say.
You can have your tactic set as the one with 2 CBs for 6 days and 22hrs every week, and then use the 3 CB formation 2 hrs every week only during the match.
Primary trained tactic under Training tab can be set to anyone you want despite what tactic is being shown under the tactic screen.
BTW, when I set a 3CB tactic my team wants 5 CBs, not 6 like yours. So its not set in stone.
0 -
7 minutes ago, Ron Wandle said:
The problem is that the primary tactic gets trained on more than other tactics.
you can choose that under training unrelated to which of the 3 tactics you use.
0 -
8 hours ago, Ron Wandle said:
Yeah, I've changed my main tactic to the back three version as I got promoted.
It's a bit silly, as it effectively means one can't use a back three as a primary tactic. It would be better if the maximum number of required players for squad depth to satisfy squad happiness was five players. If one was playing a 3-5-2, one would probably only need five central midfielders.
I'm fighting relegation, and would prefer to use the back three as my primary tactic, but doing so reduces morale across my entire squad.
You can promote reserve players to the senior squad, or if nothing else works just leave the tactic screen being your 2CB tactic through the week and change it to the prefered 3 CB one on match day.
0 -
7 minutes ago, Ron Wandle said:
Most of my squad are unhappy at the lack of depth at centre-back.
I have five senior centre-backs, all of 3-star rating or above. Sometimes I play with a back four (2 CD), sometimes I play with a back three (3 CD).
I'm having enough trouble keeping five centre-backs happy and am going to have to loan or sell one or two. Six centre-backs would be excessive. I don't know whether I have to go and find an Breakthrough Prospect or an Emergency Back-Up centre-back who never plays, just to fill this unrealistic quota.
watch their concern change immediately as you change your tactic from the one with 2 CBs to the one with 3!
1 -
2 minutes ago, thomas_e said:
I think you missed the irony
Likewise
0 -
8 minutes ago, wazzaflow10 said:
Tell me this game isn't scripted against me? Utter and complete frustration.
The game isn't scripted against you.
It can be frustrating indeed! But each football match is a simulation of 100s of factors and variables, its not a scripted story.
0 -
On 26/11/2022 at 19:19, Rub Me said:
Ergo, the guide is crap and has now caused issues in the dressing room and to one of my key players.
Seems like OP is long gone, but I dont understand his logic here. Its not the valuation guide that has caused issues in his dressing room, its the simple fact his GK wasn't allowed a move to a bigger club. Lazio is just playing the game here, unsettling him with low bids waiting for him to kick up a fuzz in burnley.
OP might see burnely as a well established PL club now, but clearly his in-game football world does not.
On 26/11/2022 at 18:30, Rub Me said:a prem season where we managed to stay up
Might suggest that both your GK and Lazio dont see you as an established PL team. If you were a top club things would look very different I'm sure.
1 -
50 minutes ago, pancone said:
No sir, the code isn't stolen. I buyed Football Manager 2023 (Multi-Platform) - Europe from instant-gaming.com and i have no problem.
Those two are in no way mutually exclusive. Also, if a non-partner got cd keys cheaper than the official publishers its obviously because of dirty deeds.
0 -
21 minutes ago, ftblmanager said:
Interesting, why would the option be offered then if it doesn't actually exist?
Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing - The option to add "buying team pays x amount wages" and then choose remove it and exclude from negotiation?
IDK why it works like that, just stumbled onto the same problem myself and this is the solution I've found - given that we're talking abuot the same thing of course
0 -
13 minutes ago, ftblmanager said:
Every time I offer a player, I mark the option to exclude 'Selling team pays percentage of wages' and I'd hazard 90% of the time all I get back is offers with 50% of wage covered by me.
Is this a known issue, it's very frustrating.
you need an initial offer first in order to exclude any clauses AFAIK, try to set it to 5% and hardlock it, and then try exclude from the oncoming negotiations. That way they cant hardlock 50% first.
0 -
10 hours ago, Andrew Marines said:
Watch during the match if your playmakers overlap on their run. It usually happens when you have them in CML CMR positions. In that case try "stay wider" to not make them go into the other side of the field. This could work but be careful if you're really obtaining what you want
This.
If you play out from the back f.ex., and the ball ends up on either side of the pitch your playmakers will drift to that side to offer a short passing option, it very easily gets congested, playmakers often gets man marked and you've effectively set yourself in a sideways pressing trap where the only option is to hoof the ball to the opposite winger or your striker.
0 -
On 26/11/2022 at 18:30, Rub Me said:
Yet, despite this, he is only "worth" between 1.3 - 2.7m according to the guides. Lazio had a bid of 1.4m rejected and now the player is unhappy and is causing disruption. It's a joke.
So Lazio could have asked his agent if he's willing to move, your GK said yes and Lazio knew he would throw a fit if you rejected their bid for him. If your GK didnt care about the rejected bid it would've been higher - to sway you to sell rather than sway the GK to move.
If I was Lazio, I would do the same thing.
BTW, the game takes quite some time to recognize your success, and see your team as being "permanently" improved rather than just an overachieveing Burnley that could go on a slump at any time. If you had the same GK in City,Pool etc his price would be higher, naturally, but for the game to recognize burnley as a true contender to city,pool etc takes a long time, the game doesnt seem made for instant fast success, its meant for you to take a loooong time to become a genuine PL contender and not just this seasons Leicester.
0 -
15 hours ago, phantombandit said:
Belgium only has one cup and I got knocked out first round (league winner here lol), and the champions league which we got knocked out in group stage so that means max 7 appearances that could not be league matches.
and these players are all 1st team players, located in and training with your 1st team? I've noticed if you add a reserve team player to your 1st team training through the training - units menu they get measured on 1st team appearances and not reserve team. If thats not your case you really should post it in the bugtracker.
0 -
7 hours ago, Dominik_ said:
This seems like just a Japan database... national team is included? How do I input this into my game?
download the files, put them in C:\User\my documents\football manager 2023\editor data (create the editor data file if it doesnt already exist)
then you add or remove the files when you start a new game, they appear under the database choice.
0 -
27 minutes ago, rp1966 said:
I was talking about the de facto truth said about FM by many on this forum whenever the subject of improved match graphics is raised. I'm not one of those people who uses FM in place of SI. Also that quote you used was from 2016 - we've had the 2018 graphical regression since then so I'd take that quote with a very big pinch of salt.
Ah, good to hear, I must have misunderstood you then, I thought you meant SI kept telling themselves that we the players dont care about graphics, which is the opposite of what I've heard from them over the years. I havent heard any different since 2018 either, that they now dont care about graphics, which is why I asked if you had seen any comments or had a source.
0 -
10 minutes ago, el_manayer said:
Nobody was talking about SI saying anything
I know he said FM, but FM doesn't make FM, SI does.
1 -
You could also try the opposite, lure the opposition out of their defence. If they just sit back, and you push most your players forward on an attacking mentality you just create a clusterf*ck of players being in the way. I'd say you want the opposite, more supporting roles, force them to come out of their lines and close you down, have attacking players doing opposite movements, strikers coming deep while AMC running forward etc.
You can also try something as simple as a support-role for a lone striker and have wide men cut in on attacking duties, a lone AF trying to run in behind a low defence where 21 of 22 players is in or around the oppositions 18yrd box is an impossible task.
0 -
54 minutes ago, Bielsa1975 said:
So you never had a player turn your 2k a week wage down only to sign for AI team on £600 a week in a league below ? You never had a club turn down your 15 mill offer for a 1mill value player only for the club to sell to an AI team for 2million ? I must have brought the only dodgy copy every year then ,and dont get me started on AI XG versus human .
You sound more and more like a sore loser venting some frustration over the game, you didn't even try to answer the question, why would SI go to lengths and spend time making the game treat humans different than the AI and then lie about it because people wouldn't buy the game if they knew it was done. It makes absolutely no sense.
4 -
35 minutes ago, rp1966 said:
I think there's also the thing of if you repeat something enough times it becomes the received wisdom and de facto 'truth' - in FMs case that the players don't care about graphics - which is disingenuous in the extreme.
Wait what? When did SI say this? Do you have a source for that? It's a complete 180 from what I've always heard them say in public
Miles Jacobson to fourfourtwo:
"In an ideal world, I would like to not be able to tell the difference between a game of football on TV, and a game of football within Football Manager. I would like it to be playing on a holographic on a table in front of you. I would like some kind of deep AI learning, rather than just having multiple-choice answers for press conferences, so you could say whatever you wanted to and the journalist would be able to react."
0 -
3 hours ago, phantombandit said:
Hello,
I have been looking at the actual playtime of some of my players and I am wondering if there is a bug.
So far my team has played a total of 50 matches this season.
I have a player who has made 28 appearances, 7 starting. This player has played in the majority of games, but has an actual playing time of surplus to requirements.
I have another player who has made 29 appearances with 12 starting and is listed as emergency backup.
It seems to me that both of these players should be impact sub.
Sounds weird indeed, are those starts and subs in the league or mostly cups? You should raise a ticket in the bugtracker!
0 -
1 hour ago, Bielsa1975 said:
I say what i see , i paid for the game didnt i ,you just toe the line and bow down to mods
The game developers have clearly stated that the game does NOT differentiate between human and AI players. To believe they lie to you to hide the truth makes you a conspiracy-theorist by definition.
0
FM23 signing youth
in Football Manager General Discussion
Posted
As the opposing fans in Spain says about Real, Así gana el Madrid, loosely translates to "this is how madrid wins". If SI are gonna incorporate the shady transfers Real gets through for sake of realism they gonna have to incorporate the lawsuits and criminal court cases that follows too?