Jump to content
Sports Interactive Community

AFCBeer

Members+
  • Content Count

    246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About AFCBeer

  • Rank
    Amateur

About Me

  • About Me
    Roaming Playmaker at Dean Court

Interests

  • Interests
    Beer and the Cherries

Favourite Team

  • Favourite Team
    AFC Bournemouth

Currently Managing

  • Currently Managing
    PSG

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Sorry for late reply and I don’t think we are too far apart here. What I’d like to clarify is understanding how the player will play in relation to the rest of the tactic AND the opposition set up. When your overall team mentality is cautious, the likelihood is the AI will push higher up the pitch and leave more space behind. As per your screenshot, the attack duty winger’s mentality might only be ‘positive’ but he has a lot more space to be positive in. Now consider a team playing with an attacking mentality and an AI defending against that. Most of the time they will be restricting space behind. Therefore, the support duty winger with the same positive mentality will be doing a lot of work in front of the AI defence. Now that’s not necessarily a bad thing but you do need to consider the other roles and duties around them. If the support winger can drag defenders further up the pitch and wide, it could provide a perfect opportunity for a CM on attack to exploit. Alternatively, if you emphasise early crosses, a striker on attack could work well. I’m not trying to argue support duties are bad. As someone posted above, successful tactics have been created this way. However, we have to understand the OP’s dilemma, and that is having plenty of possession and shots but little in terms of clear chances and goals. If this is our struggle we need width, depth, creativity and penetration to our attack. This doesn’t need to be a winger on attack, but I think it’s very difficult to create this without a couple of attack duties somewhere in a front 4 or 5.
  2. Sure but I feel this is an unnecessary complication. After all you can’t play cautious and attacking team mentalities at the same time. The basic premise is an attack duty winger will be more advanced and therefore put more pressure on the opposition back line than the support duty. And if we are struggling for chances, we need to put more pressure on an opponent. The attack duty winger is actually my favourite role in the game. In the right set up it can be a 20+ goal a season player. When the ball is on the opposite flank, my attack duty winger regularly sits on the last shoulder between CB and FB and arrives at the far post for tap ins. I just don’t see the same level of penetration from the support duty winger. Even if the player instructions screen suggests they should play the same, I prefer to trust what I see on the pitch.
  3. You need attack duties! Just somewhere but you definitely need some. There’s no point having 65% possession without penetration. Players with attack duties are the ones that take opponents on and make forward runs into the box. I notice you have your midfielders playing more risky passes, but who will those risky passes go to if no one is making positive runs into space to receive them. It doesn’t really matter how high your tempo is if all your passing is in front of the opponent Have a check where your shots are being taken from. I suspect most of these are from long range as when a player receives the ball in the attacking third, his only option is to pass sideways or backwards or take a speculative shot. Its so important to have width and movement in the final third. There are a number of ways to do this. A wing back on attack, one of the inside forwards on attack, changing an IF to a winger and most certainly a striker on attack. Even the Mez could go on attack. You don’t need to do all of these but at least try something. And since you will be adding attack duties, there is no harm in reducing team mentality or tempo slightly to make the overall play more precise.
  4. I’m just thinking about your left flank. With the FB on defend and the winger on attack there might be quite a large gap between the 2. Since he won’t be playing risky passes if he is too isolated he might have no option than just to hoof it. This might not be the case but you will have to see how this plays out on the pitch. Having the Carillero as your left CM could help as he should pull wider to fill the gap between FB and winger. Id be slightly concerned with 2 attack duties on the right. I might choose to put the right CM on defend for a bit more protection. Again though, you will need to watch games to determine if it is genuinely a problem or not.
  5. Please can we have the option to state why a transfer bid has been rejected back? I keep getting completely derisory bids from the AI for my players. Often a third of the value I paid 12 months earlier. You hear it all the times clubs stating a bid is completely unacceptable so its odd this feature was removed. It could be extended further to reject a bid for now but might be considered at some point in the future. That would help with explaining the reason to the player too. Attached is an example which has particularly frustrated me. I keep getting £675k bids for this player. I signed him for £3.5m and he's been a huge success for me. He won't be going anywhere for less than £12m. I'd love to be able to explain to the idiot AI managers how insulting their offers are! EDIT: Sorry I have a MacBook and I don't know how to get the Print Screen and attach function to work but sure you can get the gist!
  6. I’d have thought the percentage boost from match preparation would be somewhat fluid. If you have top quality coaches, with excellent training facilities, professional players who achieve a high training rating for the week, logically I’d expect to receive a higher boost than if I was poor in all these categories.
  7. By definition your tactic is cautious. When you were an unknown quality or an underdog this probably worked in your favour. After reaching the play offs, AI teams no doubt show you a lot more respect and will sit back against you. You don’t necessarily need to go to a much higher mentally, but I do think you need some more attack duties to provide a bit more movement and penetration in the final third. You also lack the ability to win the ball high up the pitch. That makes it very easy for a team intent on sitting back. I would up your line of engagement and add an attack duty for one of your wingers. I’d also be tempted to give an attack duty to a FB, or at least up the one on defend to support. Now this could just be me overthinking things, but I’d prefer to have the BBM behind the AF. Since the AF should be creating vertical space in behind, then having the BBM running into the space he creates could be effective. I’m not sure what PI’s you have but it might be worth telling your other CM to play more direct passes to force the penetration a little more. Finally if you find the increased LoE, mentality and attack duties compromise your defensive a little too much, it’s perfectly fine to put the CM on a defend duty as he should still play early balls with direct passing.
  8. Just to emphasise this point as it’s important in the context of FM and how counter attacking teams play IRL. A counter attack might only represent 10% of a team’s total attacks. These typically occur automatically* when the AI over commits and leaves space behind. This is why attributes are so important. A side like Bournemouth are going to be so much more effective at the counter than most sides due to the pace of the attacking players. When the counter isn’t on, which is most of the time, counter attacking teams will look to transition into an attack just like almost any other side. A DLP could form an important part of that, especially if the attributes suit the player in question. * In FM19 the automatic counters function slightly differently. We do now have a specific TI to encourage this. Nonetheless the fundamental principles haven’t changed. The more you set up to draw the AI onto you and leave space behind, the more effective the counter will be.
  9. Well as someone who has watched 95% of Bournemouth’s live matches home away over the past 4 years I’m probably better placed than most to comment! I’ll try to describe how we are supposed to play rather than the utter tactical nonsense Eddie Howe has been producing in the last few months... The basic shape I’d describe is a 4-4-1-1 with 2 DM’s. The idea is to sit deep and hit teams on the counter. Not sure if this would be the strongest XI in FM, but it would be IRL Begovic GK(d) Smith FB(a) Cook CB(d) Aké CB(d) Daniels FB(s) Cook DLP(s) Lerma BWM(s) Brooks WM(s). Fraser IW(a) King SS Wilson AF(a) I’d agree with a balanced mentality with a slightly lower defensive line. Tempo and pressing are about average really. We do appear narrow in attack, but this is mainly due to Brooks and Fraser’s roles rather than the actual shape of the team. In fact I’d argue the initial focus of our approach play was down both flanks. The main penetration is through the individual pace and dribbling ability of Brooks, King and Fraser. It’s certainly not a team instruction to dribble more, it’s individual instructions for these players. The difference between Brooks and Fraser is that Brooks starts from a narrow position and roams. He’ll also look for a through ball and rarely try a cross. Fraser on the other hand is like a traditional winger who stays wide early in the attack. He’ll then cut inside as he reaches the final third. He is a right footer who plays on the left, but since his crossing off his weaker foot is among the best in the PL, I feel the Inverted Winger role suits him perfectly in FM as he’ll definitely put in a cross from either foot if he can.
  10. In this debate, instead of thinking in terms of sides parking the bus or defensive mentalities, it’s be more useful to think about underdog teams. Its perfectly conceivable a team IRL and also the within the constraints of the FM match engine could play low risk mentality with short passes and generate a lot of possession. I can’t think of a single example of an underdog team playing this way IRL. Just look at any PL game between the Big 6 and Other 14. There is usually a huge gulf in possession stats. I actually feel FM19 has got better at ending this possession anomaly compared to previous versions. The ME itself isn’t the problem here. It’s slightly too easy for players to retain possession facing a heavy press but not too far off. The AI is more the issue. No manager of an underdog team IRL sets them up to slowly retain the ball in a low block. However, this is almost the default for managers in FM and it’s why possession stats are not currently that realistic.
  11. My concern here is your play will be very one dimensional. There is no creativity from midfield and little support out wide from the full backs. It looks like you will be overly reliant on quality crosses from the wingers. That’s great if they are exceptional players, but a Pressing Forward (even on attack) might not be in position to take advantage. The worst thing is, given your reliance on wide players for creativity, you focus play through the middle. The only way I see your current roles working is as part of a direct and wide counter attacking system. You’ve not given much detail as to what you perceive as your specific issues. That said you are 5th in the league so it’s not disastrous. The main advice I’d give is to look at the attributes of your players and think about the best way to exploit that.
  12. This will sound like really boring advice but sometimes you just need to recognise when a 0-0 at home is a satisfactory result. In the past I’ve often got “FM’d” trying to force a result. Yet by the end of the season, those draws do add up. And somewhat counter-intuitively, playing more conservatively might actually help you break down a packed defence.
  13. I wouldn’t be overly concerned by the manual. Ultimately it’s about getting a system which works regardless if it’s counter productive or not according to the manual. Even if you don’t get your front men to join in the pressing, if your back 8 do force a turnover over, likelihood is your forwards will be in space high up the pitch and ideally positioned for a direct counter attack. Other options include dropping one or more strikers to AM strata. Leicester’s title winning side was almost certainly a 4-4-1-1 with the hard working Okazaki dropping deeper without the ball. It could be argued Atletico are more of a 4-4-2-0 which should get the forwards pressing from a lower line of engagement. Something I’ve not tried but must be worth a go is asking strikers to man mark the opponents MC’s. I’m not totally convinced by the way man marking PI’s work in FM, but intuitively this should create some sort of ‘backwards pressing’.
  14. I'm surprised to see Simon Francis at Bournemouth with a Jumping Reach of just 12. I appreciate this attribute is more than just about height, but if Francis is 12 then no way can Nathan Ake be 15. I think Ive seen stats showing Francis as having the highest number of headed clearances in the PL in previous seasons.
  15. This might depend on the tactical style. The first system I’ve created has lots of urgent pressing. I cannot give an extra closing down to many roles as the bar is already maxed out. I suspect this is what we might be seeing with the BWM.
×
×
  • Create New...