Hajduk

Hi,

If you check the editor, the difference is nowhere near that great, as those stars suggest. So I have no idea why it is shown as such but in the game, you shouldn't have issues in player production. We might bump their youth recruitment a bit though.

 

Hajduk has a dedicated researcher who is knowledgeable about FM and Hajduk players and is also a supporter. So I trust his judgment. Maybe someone could have been rated differently, but I don't think it's a systematic problem.

Ok, but change this thing with season tickets and income from merchandise

Also I try few simulations and I think that Niko Sigur have unrealistic low PA. He is always in starting 11 of Hajduk and he is one of the best players this season, after Pukstas probably best talent from Hajduk. 

Hey! I just started a new game in FM24 (was playing the old saved game from FM23 until now) and noticed the same issue about which I have to complain. In my opinion, the Hajduk U19 team was utterly destroyed in this FM, and this is not the first time, and probably will not be the last...

The Hajduk U19 team played in the UCL finals, and all we get are players with a PA of max 120? Not to mention that, for example, Kavelj, a player who played in all the games, has 1 in dribbling, 1 in finishing, 1 in penalty taking, 2 in technique, 4 off the ball, etc., and he was one of the best players! This is really shameful, and anyone claiming that "Our researcher is good and a Hajduk fan" is not a good enough excuse for such embarrassment.

I mean, look at the screenshots and take a bow to the guys who kicked out Milan, Man City, and Dortmund on their way to the final. It is also very interesting to observe how every year after some young talent from Hajduk moves to another league, he gets much better (even if the player is not playing better, his stats and abilities goes up).

On the other hand, Dinamo and Lokomotiva have excellent talents, even though they haven't won the league or been the best (last year Dinamo was 1st, but I'm speaking about the recent years), and we have to ask ourselves - is Croatian research fair and objective?

I'm not saying that Hajduk should have the best young players or that all of them should be superstars, but having so many attributes so low for players who played a key part in getting almost to the top of Europe is a true sign that something is rotten in Croatian research.