Suggestion: New Reputation system

think the current reputation system based on regional/national/continental/world is inherently wrong mainly because those labels are not meant to describe reputation but how well known you are instead.

For example if an unkown manager takes control of a big club like Barcelona, he is inmediately known continentally if he has horrible results his reputation would be bad but it would still be bad in a continental scale istead of regional or national.

If a Female manager takes control of lets say Everton, she would inmediately have world reputation, her name would be known trough the world as the first female to manage in the premiership again depending on her performance her reputation could be good or bad but would be of a worldly scale nonetheless.

The same goes for clubs, for example liverpool would only have good National Reputation but would have Excellent Continental and World Reputation because it consistently does better in international competitions than it does in local ones.

The best example for players we can see with the French squad for World cup 2006. Ribery had Excellent national reputation altough at that point he was unknown continentally and worldly however he was picked over Giuly who had average world Reputation.

The system I propose is to devide reputation in 4 categories club/country/continent and world and in each category you can have a level of unknown/bad/good/excellent/legend. Of player/mangers can have different levels of reputation in different clubs, continents and countries.

I like it, it actually does show reputation and not how well your known like you say, thumbs up from me:thup: