[Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)]

Tutoring lasts 180 days. Then when someone can tutor someone else again is 3 months. I understood the question and read it properly, no need to post in caps to stress something, especially when its wrong. So if you can tutor again after 2 weeks it is a bug.

Can you post examples/saved game where you've been able to do it again after 2 weeks

I was posting in caps to highlight the important part of the question, not to stress I was correct. Hence referring to whether I was mistaken or not to make sure. And I did not know it was wrong, that's why I asked if that is what you were saying was a bug.

Where does it say that it has to be 180 days until a tutor can tutor again?

[Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)]

It's 3 month, so if you are seeing this after 2 weeks then its a bug.

Huh? Isn't it 3 months for the actual tutoring to take place? If I'm not mistaken, his question was how long AFTER SOMEONE HAS FINISHED can this person tutor again. Which for me is 2 weeks. Are you saying that's a bug?

[Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)]

I've recently discovered the answer to that myself from checking everyday until it was possible :\ It's two weeks my friend!

[Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)]

Hi guys, first post here, and hopefully it's not too much of a stupid one (though I'm in a safe thread if it is right!?)

I was wondering, what is the effect, if any, on telling a player (via private chat) they have to work harder in training to stay in the first team/challenge for a position. I've generally gone with this after they've had poor reviews from the coaches for that month (unless they've had injuries), or if they have red/orange arrows for training effort. So far all of the responses have been positive from players, but does anybody know if this effect is anything more than cosmetic? Cheers!

I think doing this can trigger an increase in professionalism, mainly in youngsters. I could be wrong though.

[Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)]

Hey gang! Quick 'stupid' question. When advising my MC duo to Man Mark specific opposition players, it automatically chooses the same position they are in. IE If I want my MCr and MCl to mark my opponents MCr and MCl, the MCl takes the MCl and vice versa. Shouldn't the MCl take the MCr? Should we manually do that or leave it at the default suggestion? Cheers.

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Good to know ^^

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Another question, sorry to bother.

In the OP you suggest using Tugg's training. As his schedules are set up for positions not in the tactic, and some roles like the Centre Striker aren't really attacking striker roles. For example, would you have all three strikers in that same schedule?

Cheers.

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Hey Mr Hough and JP

One more quick question.

Your tactic has Roaming set to Stick to Position in the team settings. While I use Genie (naughty naughty) I obviously see that certain players have a high Free Role stat. How open to interpretation do you think this tactic is to throw in a free role?

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Edit: Ignore

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Thank you very much. Sorry, was a little sleepy by the end of reading all this.

Very nice work Gentlemen!

Go All Whites!

[Mr Hough 10.3 Tactics]

Slightly confused.

The last tactic in the OP is the supposed one with JP's tweak's, right? And his only tweak was moving all players to middle of Closing Down slider, right?

How come the last tactic for download doesn't have this tweak then?