GP Posted November 20, 2009 Share Posted November 20, 2009 Can anyone help me with how does the player match rating work (How is it calculated during a game) and what is better - a consistant good match rating? - or a higher CA and a lower match rating? For example if in my team I have 2 AMR's who both have a high consistancy rating of lets say 15 and they both play to the same match tactics without tweaks during the game. Why does my higher CA player get 6.5 score on average match ratings and my lower CA player get an average of 7.5, and as above what player is actually better to play? I know peoples immediate reaction will be it is your tactics that are not correct, but being honest with yourself how many times have people had this? You have spent a fortune on a player who never gets a 7 or above match rating no matter how many times you change your tactics or his position to accomadate him. As a rule now I never buy a player who has an average match rating lower than a 7 no matter how high his CA is, but is this correct? Does anyone have a view on this or even a solution? Am I doing something wrong perhaps? Any feedback would be appreciated. TA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GP Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share Posted November 21, 2009 Can anyone offer some advice please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.