ryandormer Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Two questions concerning training and the coaches' feedback: 1) If the feedback is that the player will never become more than accomplished in a new position, is this gospel? Or can the player still become a natural at some point (I have Havertz playing inside forward support on the right at Arsenal, with good attributes and PPMs to compliment the role, but the coach doesn't think he'll ever be a natural); and 2) If the feedback concerning specific training is that that area' is no longer a weakness', or the player feels that the training is not beneficial, does this guarantee that the specific training will not work? Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovis Dexter Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Anything that a coach or any other member of staff says is not gospel. It is their opinion at that particular time and they are often wrong. Players are also very often wrong when they say that the training is not beneficial. Going to "Player>>Development>>Attribute Changes" can help you decide whether or not the training has been beneficial or not. Personally, I wouldn't worry whether or not the player is accomplished or natural ... there is minimal difference between the two descriptions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrewsgn Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Piggy backing on OP's question... I have a player who plays as a DLP in my tactic in the DM position. He is Natural at CM and Accomplished at DM. Is it better to train him as a DLP in the CM position or DM position? IE does the extra position training hurt his attribute development? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
herne79 Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, andrewsgn said: Piggy backing on OP's question... I have a player who plays as a DLP in my tactic in the DM position. He is Natural at CM and Accomplished at DM. Is it better to train him as a DLP in the CM position or DM position? IE does the extra position training hurt his attribute development? Personally I'd train him as a DLP in the CM position. The difference between accomplished and natural isn't worth worrying about and it can take forever anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hovis Dexter Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 AFAIK it doesn't really matter. He'll be concentrating on learning the same attributes in either position. If you put him in the DM position and if he graduated from accomplished to natural in that position it would use up some of his CA points. Personally, I'd leave him in the CM position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryandormer Posted May 1, 2019 Author Share Posted May 1, 2019 Thanks for the responses, everyone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.