After lot of tweaking, I finally made a system that works.

[sarimbleedblue]

So the tactics:-

sk(su)

Cd(de) Cd (de)

IWB(AT) WB(AT)

DLP( SU) CM(DE)

W(su) AM(SU) SS(at) IF(at)

Team instructions:-

Shorter passing, wbib, no dribbling, counter press, and roll it out, much higher line of engagement. 

PI for wingers and CM is roam from position.

So what do you experienced managers thinks of this formation? Any more tips to make it solid? 

Thanks in advance. 

Thanks @herne79 and other peoples too.

[Warrenwwr]

without seeing it in a Screenshot, the tactic sounds to me very narrow and things might get congested in the middle 

but you have a W and a WB to help reduce the pressure in the middle. So that might balance things.

Sounds interesting so far. Let's see some screenies

[Experienced Defender]

2 hours ago, sarimbleedblue said:

PI for wingers and CM is roam from position

None of your two CMs can roam from position, because both CM on defend duty and DLP (on either duty) have the hard-coded "hold position" TI.

[sarimbleedblue]

1 hour ago, Experienced Defender said:

None of your two CMs can roam from position, because both CM on defend duty and DLP (on either duty) have the hard-coded "hold position" TI.

Hey sorry I wanted to say AM. @Experienced Defender any suggestions though???

 

[Experienced Defender]

12 hours ago, sarimbleedblue said:

@Experienced Defender any suggestions though???

Well, given that you said in the title of the thread that your tactic works, I would rather refrain from giving suggestions. If it really works for you, then stick with it.