Jump to content

1. Fergie's Red Empire


Recommended Posts

On 1/7/2018 at 14:53, Jean0987654321 said:

If we are talking about the position of Giggs, then I would say W (s). I don't recall Giggs cutting in much. Nani, certainly IW (a). Park Ji-Sung is a unique one but that position is easy (DW (s) w/ Get Further Forward, Roam From Position, Sit Narrower)

Giggs would be a heavily modified WM (S) with some player moves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 207
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Been thinking about this, as I’ve always wanted to make a similar system in FM but have never known where to start.

I think I would go with:

VDS: GK (d)

RB - Brown: FB (s)

CB - Ferdinand: CB (s)

CB - Vidic: CB (s)

LB - Evra: WB (s)

RCM - Carrick: DLP (d)

LCM - Scholes: DLP (s)

LW - Giggs: WM (s) - sit narrow

AMR - Ronaldo: IF (a) - roam from position

RCF - Tevez: DLF (s) 

LCF - Rooney: CF (s)

 

The key to getting this working is the individual players’ attributes and PPMs. Evra would get forward a lot, Giggs would play risky passes, Scholes and Carrick dictated tempo whilst Scholes would also switch the play to the flanks, Rooney and Tevez would both drop deep and had high work rate, Ronaldo shoot more often and had incredible physical AND technical attributes. You can’t plug any players in and make it work like that United side.

Mentality is tricky, so I’d sit in the middle and say standard. I also agree with those that say it was a more structured shape.

 

The secondary shape more often used in Europe would be a 4-1-4-1 with a pair of hard working CMs, two from Anderson, Hargreaves and Fletcher (playing as CM (s) or BWM (s) in front of a DLP (d), with two WM (s and a) wide and a CF (s) up front.  The striker would usually be Rooney or Ronaldo, and they would interpret the CF role very differently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, blehq12 said:

Would disagree with this part imo. Imho Ferdinand and Vidic weren't both as stoppers, one would cover for the other.

Btw @howard moon what are you TIs?

Oops, yes - that’s a mistake. They should both be on defend. No need to make them cover and stopper as their natural attributes make them play that way anyway.

Not sure about TIs as I’ve not actually used this in FM yet. But I’d say they could change depending on opposition. Perhaps play wider and play out from defence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, howard moon said:

Oops, yes - that’s a mistake. They should both be on defend. No need to make them cover and stopper as their natural attributes make them play that way anyway.

Not sure about TIs as I’ve not actually used this in FM yet. But I’d say they could change depending on opposition. Perhaps play wider and play out from defence?

When John O Shea played he would usually function as a CD (D).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, goqs06 said:

When John O Shea played he would usually function as a CD (D).

agreed.

On 1/14/2018 at 04:18, howard moon said:

Been thinking about this, as I’ve always wanted to make a similar system in FM but have never known where to start.

I think I would go with:

VDS: GK (d)

RB - Brown: FB (s)

CB - Ferdinand: CB (s)

CB - Vidic: CB (s)

LB - Evra: WB (s)

RCM - Carrick: DLP (d)

LCM - Scholes: DLP (s)

LW - Giggs: WM (s) - sit narrow

AMR - Ronaldo: IF (a) - roam from position

RCF - Tevez: DLF (s) 

LCF - Rooney: CF (s)

 

The key to getting this working is the individual players’ attributes and PPMs. Evra would get forward a lot, Giggs would play risky passes, Scholes and Carrick dictated tempo whilst Scholes would also switch the play to the flanks, Rooney and Tevez would both drop deep and had high work rate, Ronaldo shoot more often and had incredible physical AND technical attributes. You can’t plug any players in and make it work like that United side.

Mentality is tricky, so I’d sit in the middle and say standard. I also agree with those that say it was a more structured shape.

 

The secondary shape more often used in Europe would be a 4-1-4-1 with a pair of hard working CMs, two from Anderson, Hargreaves and Fletcher (playing as CM (s) or BWM (s) in front of a DLP (d), with two WM (s and a) wide and a CF (s) up front.  The striker would usually be Rooney or Ronaldo, and they would interpret the CF role very differently.

park ji sung a DW (S). rooney/ronaldo in the CF role would be a DLF (S) on roam from position and move into channels, they would drop deep and cause havoc, bringing others into play.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/13/2018 at 14:13, blehq12 said:

That's more for the CL final, not the average shape for the entire system.

No, that's the sides they played on every time they played together that season, and the season after.

 

Here's the midfield for the match vs Barcelona for example. Carrick right, Scholes left.

2008-04-29+UCL+Man+Utd+v+Barcelona+Exten

And here's a shot of the defence in action, Ferdinand on the right, Vidic on the left.

zu8LLQw.jpg?1

Edited by mjp1
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, howard moon said:

So a CF (s) then?!?

A CF (S) would do. Ronaldo/Rooney would drop deep in the 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation, but not to deep as a DLF (S) or one who would drag players out of position like a F9 (S).

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, goqs06 said:

A CF (S) would do. Ronaldo/Rooney would drop deep in the 4-5-1/4-3-3 formation, but not to deep as a DLF (S) or one who would drag players out of position like a F9 (S).

That would depend on the PPMs and the attributes (especially off the ball). Rooney would have the ‘comes deep’ PPM, and both would have high off the ball attributes, so coupled with a support duty and the high creative freedom the role provides, would drop into spaces 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2018 at 02:56, mjp1 said:

No, that's the sides they played on every time they played together that season, and the season after.

 

Here's the midfield for the match vs Barcelona for example. Carrick right, Scholes left.

2008-04-29+UCL+Man+Utd+v+Barcelona+Exten

And here's a shot of the defence in action, Ferdinand on the right, Vidic on the left.

zu8LLQw.jpg?1

What if Carrick played with Anderson? Carrick would still be on the right, correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, goqs06 said:

What if Carrick played with Anderson? Carrick would still be on the right, correct?

Yep. Especially as Anderson was left-footed. 

And just to confirm what others have said: Ferdinand ALWAYS played on the right, Vidic on the left. If Brown or Pique played at CB, they would slot in the place of whoever they were replacing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, goqs06 said:

What if Carrick played with Anderson? Carrick would still be on the right, correct?

As has been said, even more so because of Anderson being left footed. I can't remember if they switched when Hargreaves played alongside Carrick, but don't know if that ever happened anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 14/01/2018 at 04:18, howard moon said:

 Mentality is tricky, so I’d sit in the middle and say standard. I also agree with those that say it was a more structured shape.

 

The secondary shape more often used in Europe would be a 4-1-4-1 with a pair of hard working CMs, two from Anderson, Hargreaves and Fletcher (playing as CM (s) or BWM (s) in front of a DLP (d), with two WM (s and a) wide and a CF (s) up front.  The striker would usually be Rooney or Ronaldo, and they would interpret the CF role very differently.

I’d agree with structure but Ferguson always emphasise on counter attacks and controlling the game so counter/control for me.

The midfield 3 are spot on, but the roles vary for the wingers. When Rooney played on the wing it was a WM (a) who would cut in at times. I’ll be experimenting him as a IW (a). Park Ji Sung was defo a DW (s)

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, simonbyrneno.4 said:

Going a different route to what has been suggested in this thread already or something completely new?

I'll be incorporating elements of @goqs06 @felley @sherifdinn_ @denen123 @mjp1 and adding some ideas of my own. I watched the 07/08 season, the first time I seriously followed football. I'll be watching some old videos to help refresh myself on how they played.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, blehq12 said:

Found this video today, which is done by @Kyanite. I agree with it mostly but I found the Counter-Fluid system he listed with a few flaws.

I'm not sure he actually remembers watching Man Utd that season, he's gotten a fair bit wrong. Seems like he's copied off the Zonal Marking post and made the same mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mjp1 said:

I'm not sure he actually remembers watching Man Utd that season, he's gotten a fair bit wrong. Seems like he's copied off the Zonal Marking post and made the same mistakes.

Indeed, I'll be completing my tactic soon once I'm done with my research.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, blehq12 said:

Indeed, I'll be completing my tactic soon once I'm done with my research.

He's totally mistaken Hargreaves' role in that formation too. He stayed wide to deal with the threat of Ashley Cole, not to tuck in and contest the midfield battle, which we specifically avoided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mjp1 said:

Another video where they've gotten Carrick/Scholes and Vidic/Evra on the wrong sides!

Lol I think you’re right they are all wrongly based on the 2008 CL Final! 🤪

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, goqs06 said:

Lol I think you’re right they are all wrongly based on the 2008 CL Final! 🤪

It's definitely lazy. The Champions League final footage is so easy to find and it clearly shows which way they played, it's little things like these that make me skeptical of other tactics videos for teams I know less about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/24/2018 at 21:13, blehq12 said:

I'll be doing a tactic on this in a month or so @goqs06 @mjp1 @howard moon can't wait to see how it'll go!!!!!

 

On 1/25/2018 at 06:39, simonbyrneno.4 said:

Going a different route to what has been suggested in this thread already or something completely new?

 

On 1/25/2018 at 19:40, blehq12 said:

I'll be incorporating elements of @goqs06 @felley @sherifdinn_ @denen123 @mjp1 and adding some ideas of my own. I watched the 07/08 season, the first time I seriously followed football. I'll be watching some old videos to help refresh myself on how they played.

As promised, I'll be uploading my iteration of the tactic in about 10 min.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, blehq12 said:

As promised, I'll be uploading my iteration of the tactic in about 10 min.

Capture.thumb.PNG.9013af553a1afb56220117952f08d477.PNG

PIs:

FB: hold position

CM: more direct passes, more risky passes, shoot more often, move into channels

WM: Stay wider

IF: Sit narrower, roam from position

DLF: move into channels, roam from position

 

I've based in on my research from here:

and

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIY0e4dokyku_xObQ7LjrRQ/videos

Edited by blehq12
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, blehq12 said:

Capture.thumb.PNG.9013af553a1afb56220117952f08d477.PNG

PIs:

FB: hold position

CM: more direct passes, more risky passes, shoot more often, move into channels

WM: Stay wider

IF: Sit narrower, roam from position

DLF: move into channels, roam from position

 

I've based in on my research from here:

and

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIY0e4dokyku_xObQ7LjrRQ/videos

Looks good 👀, you should have a run with this tactic and start trying it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2018 at 11:58, blehq12 said:

Capture.thumb.PNG.9013af553a1afb56220117952f08d477.PNG

PIs:

FB: hold position

CM: more direct passes, more risky passes, shoot more often, move into channels

WM: Stay wider

IF: Sit narrower, roam from position

DLF: move into channels, roam from position

 

I've based in on my research from here:

and

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIY0e4dokyku_xObQ7LjrRQ/videos

Just dropping in to offer my 2 cents, had some issues with my account that I can't get fixed :mad: I really like the look of this one. One suggestion, you might want to remove 'moves into channels' for the cm and have an instruction for the WM to drift inside or sit narrower to create the overload in central midfield. At least when Giggs played there over Nani that is what happened. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikejess92 said:

Just dropping in to offer my 2 cents, had some issues with my account that I can't get fixed :mad: I really like the look of this one. One suggestion, you might want to remove 'moves into channels' for the cm and have an instruction for the WM to drift inside or sit narrower to create the overload in central midfield. At least when Giggs played there over Nani that is what happened. 

@mikejess92 thats how Giggs played as a WM on the left, and Hargreaves on the right, they would cut inside quite often.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 07/01/2018 at 20:10, themadsheep2001 said:

It doesn't matter:

1) they played different shapes within the style

2) the front trio swapped positions

3) different players played throughout out the the 3 years

Anyway, really like the OPs idea. Been playing around with this for a couple of years. My current shape is within the classic lopsided 4-1-4-1. Will post it up later. 

Been reading through this thread again as there are some interesting ideas, and I’ve wanted to make something modelled on this United side in FM for a while now. 

Did you ever post your tactics? I’m really interested in your interpretation, especially after reading your contributions in the big tactics thread in GD, as you mention Ferguson’s ‘style/philosophy’ a few times. @themadsheep2001

Edited by howard moon
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2018 at 11:08, howard moon said:

Been reading through this thread again as there are some interesting ideas, and I’ve wanted to make something modelled on this United side in FM for a while now. 

Did you ever post your tactics? I’m really interested in your interpretation, especially after reading your contributions in the big tactics thread in GD, as you mention Ferguson’s ‘style/philosophy’ a few times. @themadsheep2001

No I've been playing a lot of Elite Dangerous recently. But I'll try and play a few games on Saturday. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 11/02/2018 at 11:58, blehq12 said:

Capture.thumb.PNG.9013af553a1afb56220117952f08d477.PNG

PIs:

FB: hold position

CM: more direct passes, more risky passes, shoot more often, move into channels

WM: Stay wider

IF: Sit narrower, roam from position

DLF: move into channels, roam from position

 

I've based in on my research from here:

and

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIY0e4dokyku_xObQ7LjrRQ/videos

Thanks for sharing ! Though I'm not a MU supporter, 2006-2009 Man.United played the most beautiful football I've ever seen (Barça's tiki-taka was great too but I prefer MU's style) and I'm also trying to reproduce it in FM.

I think it does make sense to put Ronaldo higher up the pitch. He still played as a classical winger in 2006-2007 but 2007-2008 was his first season as a goal scoring machine, so the Inside Forward (Attack) role, most of the time on the right, probably makes the most sense. The left-winger was generally Giggs or Nani, though Ronaldo had a free role and frequently switched positions with the left-winger as well as the 2 forwards, which is difficult to reproduce in FM. And the 2 forwards, Rooney and Tevez, had a lot of defensive responsibilities in order to cover up Ronaldo. So Rooney as a Shadow Striker - Attack (AMCL) and Tevez as a Defensive Forward - Support (STCR) would be my take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 06/03/2018 at 11:49, themadsheep2001 said:

No I've been playing a lot of Elite Dangerous recently. But I'll try and play a few games on Saturday. 

07 commander. But some us aren't getting any younger so...

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, warlock said:

07 commander. But some us aren't getting any younger so...

I'm only just into the season. I play on comprehensive so I'm not quick! Standby for an update tomorrow evening. 

What I'm looking at Is the defensive position of the DM. Need him to patrol in front of the back 4 without sitting too deep or getting sucked in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 23/03/2018 at 11:21, Extremo said:

Thanks for sharing ! Though I'm not a MU supporter, 2006-2009 Man.United played the most beautiful football I've ever seen (Barça's tiki-taka was great too but I prefer MU's style) and I'm also trying to reproduce it in FM.

I think it does make sense to put Ronaldo higher up the pitch. He still played as a classical winger in 2006-2007 but 2007-2008 was his first season as a goal scoring machine, so the Inside Forward (Attack) role, most of the time on the right, probably makes the most sense. The left-winger was generally Giggs or Nani, though Ronaldo had a free role and frequently switched positions with the left-winger as well as the 2 forwards, which is difficult to reproduce in FM. And the 2 forwards, Rooney and Tevez, had a lot of defensive responsibilities in order to cover up Ronaldo. So Rooney as a Shadow Striker - Attack (AMCL) and Tevez as a Defensive Forward - Support (STCR) would be my take.

I've given my front three roaming. The forward is a CF support with moves into channels. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...