suba Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Here is the current list of players with -10 or -9 Potential Ability, sorted by their Current Ability. Age will be added later on. -10 Nope, nobody here -9 George Green, Everton – 65/-9 Tristan Berghuis, PSV – 66/-9 Wesley Said, Stade Rennais FC – 69/-9 Andreas Pereira, Manchester United – 72/-9 Ryan McLaughlin, Liverpool – 77/-9 Lorenzo Tassi, F.C. Internazionale – 77/-9 Alex Grimaldo, F.C. Barcelona B – 77/-9 Ricardo Kishna, AFC Ajax – 79/-9 Timo Werner, VFB Stuttgart II – 79/-9 Nathan Ake, Chelsea – 80/-9 Mats Daehli, Manchester United – 80/-9 Sergi Samper, F.C. Barcelona B – 80/-9 Serge Gnabry, Arsenal – 81/-9 Adrian Januzaj, Manchester United – 82/-9 Maximilian Meyer, Schalke 04 II – 83/-9 Fabrice Olinga, Yaounde – 84/-9 Hervin Ongenda, Paris Saint-Germain – 84/-9 Zakaria Bakkali, PSV – 85/-9 Muhammed Demirci, Besiktas – 85/-9 Denis Suarez, Manchester City – 86/-9 Yaisien Abdallah, Paris Saint-Germain – 86/-9 Daniele Rugani, Empoli – 88/-9 Bertrand Traore, Chelsea - 90/-9 Adam Campbell, Newcastle United – 90/-9 Luke Shaw, Southampton – 90/-9 Soule Coulibaly, Tottenham Hotspur – 90/-9 Leon Goretzka, Bochum – 90/-9 Nathaniel Chalobah, Chelsea – 93/-9 Romario, EC Vitoria – 94/-9 Alessio Romagnoli, AS Roma – 95/-9 Leandro Paredes, Boca Juniors – 96/-9 James Ward-Prowse, Southampton – 97/-9 Anass Achahbar, Feyenoord – 97/-9 Samed Yesil, Liverpool – 97/-9 Tonny Trindade de Vilhena, Feyenoord – 99/-9 Ricordo Centurion, Racing Club – 100/-9 Stefano Denswil, AFC Ajax – 100/-9 Bruma, Sporting B – 100/-9 Jean-Marie Dongou, F.C. Barcelona B – 100/-9 Esteban Andrade, Lanus – 103/-9 Lorenzo Crisetig, F.C. Internazionale – 105/-9 Valerio Verre, Genoa – 105/-9 Carlos Fierro, CD Guadalajara – 105/-9 Alvaro Vadillo, Real Betis B – 105/-9 Jack Butland, Birmingham City – 106/-9 Nicola Leali, Juventus – 106/-9 Lenny Nangis, Stade Malherbe Caen – 106/-9 Ravel Morrison, West Ham United – 108/-9 Andy Polo, Genoa CFC – 108/-9 Emre Can, FC Bayern Munchen – 109/-9 Josh McEachran, Chelsea – 110/-9 Ross Barkley, Everton – 110/-9 Nicolas Tagliafico, Banfield – 111/-9 Raheem Sterling, Liverpool – 111/-9 Memphis Depay, PSV – 111/-9 Moi Gomez, Villareal – 112/-9 Mbaye Niang, A.C. Milan – 112/-9 Paulo Dybala, Citta di Palermo – 114/-9 Jano, Spartak Moscow – 114/-9 Yassine Benzia, Olympique Lyonnais – 114/-9 Adryan, Flamengo – 115/-9 Viktor Fischer, Ajax – 115/-9 Nick Powell, Manchester United – 115/-9 Rafinha, F.C. Barcelona B – 116/-9 Paco Alcacer, Valencia C.F. – 116/-9 Erick Torres, CD Guadalajara – 117/-9 Nicusor Stanciu, Sporting Club Vaslui – 117/-9 Paul Pogba, Juventus – 117/-9 Dedryck Boyata, Manchester City – 118/-9 Juanmi, Malaga – 119/-9 Luc Castaignos, FC Twente – 120/-9 Francesco Bardi, F.C. Internazionale – 120/-9 Angelo Henriquez, Manchester United – 120/-9 Mateo Kovacic, GNK Dinamo – 121/-9 Lucas Ocampos, AS Monaco FC – 122/-9 Juan Iturbe, FCP – 122/-9 Gino Peruzzi, Velez Sarsfield – 123/-9 Leonardo Bittencourt, Borussia Dortmund – 123/-9 Jese, R. Madrid Castilla – 124/-9 Tolga Cigerci, VFL Wolfsburg – 124/-9 Ezequiel Carigliano, River Plate – 125/-9 Zakaria Labyad, Sporting (POR) – 125/-9 Gianluca Caprari, Delfino Pescara – 125/-9 Matija Nastasic, Manchester City – 125/-9 Sergi Roberto, F.C. Barcelona B – 125/-9 Facundo Ferreyra, Velez Sarsfield – 126/-9 Romelu Lukaku, Chelsea – 126/-9 Ademilson, Sao Paulo FC – 126/-9 Francis Coquelin, Arsenal – 127/-9 Mattia De Sciglio, A.C. Milan – 127/-9 Adam Maher, AZ Alkmaar – 128/-9 Gerard Deulofeu, Barcelona B – 129/-9 Kurt Zouma, As Saint-Etienne – 129/-9 Heung-Min Son, HSV – 129/-9 Marco Verratti, Paris Saint-Germain – 130/-9 Pablo Sarabia, Getafe – 130/-9 Moritz Leitner, Borussia Dortmund – 132/-9 Roberto Firmino, TSG Hoffenheim – 132/-9 Alexandre Lacazette, Lyon – 134/-9 Stephan El Shaarawy, A.C. Milan – 137/-9 Kevin De Bruyne, Chelsea – 138/-9 Alex Oxlade Chamberlain, Arsenal – 138/-9 Kyriakos Papadopoulos, Schalke 04 – 138/-9 Alan Dzagoev, CSKA Moscow – 138/-9 Gokhan Tore, Rubin Kazan – 139/-9 Raphael Varane, Real Madrid – 139/-9 Fabio, Manchester United – 140/-9 Lee Chung-Yong – 140/-9 Rodrigo, SLB – 140/-9 Julian Draxler, Schalke 04 – 140/-9 Bernd Leno, Bayer Leverkusen – 145/-9 Isco, Malaga – 146/-9 Thibaut Courtois, Chelsea – 150/-9 Players of the age of 21 or under with 160+ PA, sorted by age then Current Ability: Mauro Caballero, C Libertad – 110/170, 17 Jon Williams, Crystal Palace – 113/160, 18 Lazar Markovic, FK Partizan Belgrado – 123/160, 18 Sean Murray, Watford – 124/160, 18 Haris Vuckic, NewcastleUnited – 116/160, 19 Ruben Pardo, Real Sociedad – 124/168, 19 Maxym Koval, Dynamo Kyiv – 133/165, 19 Granit Xhaka, Borrusia Monchengladbach – 133/160, 19 Bernard, Clube Atletico Mineiro – 140/168, 19 Lucas Moura, Sao Paulo FC - 147/173, 19 Iker Munian, Athletic Club – 151/165, 19 Federico Viviani, AS Roma, 116/160, 20 Eyal Golasa, Maccabi Haifa, 120/167, 20 Pedro, Sampdoria – 122/163, 20 Marco Davide Faraoni, Udinese – 123/163, 20 Manolo Gabbiadini, Juventus – 125/167, 20 Oriol Romeu, Chelsea – 127/165, 20 Fernando, Gremio – 133/160 Casemiro, Sao Paulo FC – 136/161 Erik Lamela, AS Roma – 140/175, 20 Coutinho, F.C. Internazionale – 141/167, 20 Wellingtom Nem, Fluminense – 143/162, 20 Phil Jones, Manchester United – 144/174, 20 Christian Eriksen, AFC Ajax – 147/173, 20 Xherdan Shaqiri, Bayern Munchen – 147/175, 20 Oscar, Chelsea – 148/175, 20 Jack Wilshere, Arsenal – 149/177, 20 David Alaba, Bayern Munchen – 151/174, 20 Marc-Andre ter Stegen, Borussia Monchengladbach – 154/185, 20 Mario Gotze, Borussia Dortmund – 158/182, 20 Neymar, Santos FC – 169/188, 20 Johan Martial, Stade Brestois 29 – 118/160, 21 Andrea Bertolacci, Genoa – 124/161, 21 Emmanuel Igiebor, Real Betis – 124/161, 21 Carlos Labrin, Citta di Palermo – 126/160, 21 Alexandr Kokorin, Dinamo Mocow – 127/160, 21 Georgy Schennikov, CSKA Moscow – 129/160, 21 Ezequiel Munoz, Citta di Palermo – 130/164, 21 Felipe Gutierrez, FC Twente – 130/160, 21 James McCarthy, Wigan Athletic – 131/165, 21 Youssef Msakni, Esperance Sportive de Tunis – 132/162, 21 Sebastien Corchia, FC Sochaux – 132/165, 21 Abel Hernandez, Citta di Palermo, 133/167, 21 Panagiotis Tachtsidis, AS Roma – 134/160, 21 Alessandro Florenzi, AS Roma – 134/162, 21 Georginio Wijnaldum, PSV – 135/161, 21 Jan Kirchoff, FSV Mainz – 135/160, 21 Mattia Destro, Genoa – 135/168, 21 Victor Moses, Chelsea – 136/160, 21 Marc Bartra, F.C. Barcelona – 136/165, 21 Lorenzo Insigne, Napoli – 137/166, 21 Jack Rodwell, Manchester City – 138/165, 21 Lacina Traore, Anji Makhachkala – 138/165, 21 Luis Fernando Muriel, Udinese – 139/168, 21 Douglas Costa, Shakhtar Donetsk – 140/160, 21 Alex Sandro, FCP – 140/164, 21 Mario Fernandes, CSKA Moscow – 140/166, 21 Bojan, F.C. Barcelona – 141/166, 21 Luuk de Jong, Borussia Monchengladbach – 141/162, 21 Aaron Ramsey, Arsenal – 142/175, 21 Antoine Griezmann, Real Sociedad – 142/163, 21 Gaston Ramirez, Southampton – 142/175, 21 Danilo, FCP – 143/169, 21 Davide Santon, Newcastle United – 143/167, 21 Inigo Martinez, Real Sociedad – 143/165, 21 Romulo, Spartak Moscow – 145/170, 21 Fabio Borini, Liverpool – 145/165, 21 James Rodriguez, FCP – 145/169, 21 Lewis Holtby, Schalke 04 – 146/161, 21 Sergio Canales, Valencia – 148/168, 21 Andre Schurrle, Bayer Leverkusen – 151/165, 21 Ilkay Gundogan, Borussia Dortmund – 152/170, 21 David De Gea, Manchester United – 154/180, 21 Mario Balotelli, Manchester City – 155/168, 21 Thiago, Barcelona – 156/180, 21 All credits to Bouwzie from fm-base.co.uk who made this list. Shortlist available here http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/attachments/football-manager-2013-best-players/280825-9-10-under-21-160-pa-list-9_-10-jul-2012-.slf /edit if some moderator can sort this spoilers it would be nice, since i just dont know how they working ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty Shrimper Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Anyone got a screenie of that Mauro Caballero fella? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bermudaphilip Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Honestly it's a bit ridiculous that they have given no one -10. Can't help but feel like instead of fixed PAs players such as Gotze/Hazard/Neymar would be better put in that category. We all know they're going to be superstars, and at least this way it would be slightly unpredictable as it is in real life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubentus_Juventus Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 A hell of a lot of bias here probably, but Paul Pogba deserves a -10...just saying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bermudaphilip Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 A hell of a lot of bias here probably, but Paul Pogba deserves a -10...just saying. If he was a -10 I'd probably say that Man Utd would've done a hell of a lot more to hold onto him, despite his attitude. And probably played him more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubentus_Juventus Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 If he was a -10 I'd probably say that Man Utd would've done a hell of a lot more to hold onto him, despite his attitude. And probably played him more. ...Yeah cause we've never seen wonderkids leave their club at a young age.. Man Utd quite clearly didn't want to lose him. It's just Fergie not holding onto the promise he gave Pogba at the start of the season that made him leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bermudaphilip Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 ...Yeah cause we've never seen wonderkids leave their club at a young age..Man Utd quite clearly didn't want to lose him. It's just Fergie not holding onto the promise he gave Pogba at the start of the season that made him leave. Honestly, we've never seen clubs not play kids that are -10 at a young age too. Especially when the manager 'promises' things. I'd say that a -9 is pretty fair. -10 gives him the potential to reach the heights of Messi/Ronaldo currently which I'm pretty sure we both can agree will never happen. -9 means he can still be a world-class midfielder which he has the potential to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purefun Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 We don't need those spoilers imo. This is GPTG afterall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboJapp Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Can someone give me a quick explanation on how the ca/pa work. I've never really took much notice of it but what is the -8 -9 actually mean and if it's a fixed PA I take it they can't go any better than that but can they not reach the potential or is it a given? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
suba Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Can someone give me a quick explanation on how the ca/pa work. I've never really took much notice of it but what is the -8 -9 actually mean and if it's a fixed PA I take it they can't go any better than that but can they not reach the potential or is it a given? Here you go mate http://www.fm-base.co.uk/forum/football-manager-2013-best-players/83183-complete-ca-pa-thread.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuhrerul Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 could someone post the -8 players? many thanks in advance! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD nawrat Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Very interesting to see Dedryck Boyata is still a -9. I thought he'd have been given a fixed PA by now. Quite glad he hasn't been though, works better for me haha. Boyata and Nastasic both -9, very good. Quite frustrating to see that Karim Rekik isn't a -9 though, especially since he's much more promising than Boyata I'd say. Regardless, I suppose he's -8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 good to see sean murray with some potential, lad looks superb irl.. would have liked to see mason bennett and will hughes with a bit more than the -8's they do have happen to agree with the decision of no -10's .. a -10 indicates a definite world beater, and frankly .. there aren't any showing that amount of promise right now... and it leaves it open to having one coming through in game some stand out idiocy in the list includes: marc ter stegen with 185(!) potential... lamela with 175 phil jones iwth 174 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
fidelitywars Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 some stand out idiocy in the list includes:marc ter stegen with 185(!) potential... lamela with 175 phil jones iwth 174 Lamela has been superb this season, scoring 6 league goals already from a starting position of left wing, most of which has shown exceptional talent. He's desrving of at least 175, he's probably the biggest young talent in Italy. There's a reason why there was such a fuss made about him when he was 12; he's got alot of ability. 175 for Ramsey on the other hand... Agree that 185 for ter Stegen seems generous, though - he's looks very good but not maintained last season's promise. 165 for Munaian seems low, suggesting that he's pretty much peaked as a teenager and i'd have thought James Rodriguez would've been set higher than 169. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathxxx Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Fabrice Olinga, Yaounde – 84/-9 He's actually at Málaga CF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathxxx Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 could someone post the -8 players? many thanks in advance! I would, but I haven't got the full copy of the game yet, so don't have the editor to check the database. I always find the tendency of people to be preoccupied with -10 & -9 players quite amusing. There's actually a lot of players with -8, -7, or fixed PA's between 130 & 160, who are or will become much more rounded players, because the distribution of attributes is better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Lamela has been superb this season, scoring 6 league goals already from a starting position of left wing, most of which has shown exceptional talent. He's desrving of at least 175, he's probably the biggest young talent in Italy. There's a reason why there was such a fuss made about him when he was 12; he's got alot of ability. 175 for Ramsey on the other hand...Agree that 185 for ter Stegen seems generous, though - he's looks very good but not maintained last season's promise. 165 for Munaian seems low, suggesting that he's pretty much peaked as a teenager and i'd have thought James Rodriguez would've been set higher than 169. lamela has always been a talent.. im not disputing it... im disputing putting his potential up as high as that.. if anything, by now it should be fixed. bare in mind 160+ means a very very good top division player.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reece1973 Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Ravel Morrison you have got to be joking. Mr Arrogant Lunatic wont ever make it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bermudaphilip Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Ravel Morrison you have got to be joking.Mr Arrogant Lunatic wont ever make it. PA is about the talent. Have to have good personalities generally to achieve their full PA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falahk Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Lamela has been superb this season, scoring 6 league goals already from a starting position of left wing, most of which has shown exceptional talent. He's desrving of at least 175, he's probably the biggest young talent in Italy. There's a reason why there was such a fuss made about him when he was 12; he's got alot of ability. 175 for Ramsey on the other hand...Agree that 185 for ter Stegen seems generous, though - he's looks very good but not maintained last season's promise. 165 for Munaian seems low, suggesting that he's pretty much peaked as a teenager and i'd have thought James Rodriguez would've been set higher than 169. agree with all of this as far as the PA's goes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubentus_Juventus Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Lamela has been superb this season, scoring 6 league goals already from a starting position of left wing, most of which has shown exceptional talent. He's desrving of at least 175, he's probably the biggest young talent in Italy. There's a reason why there was such a fuss made about him when he was 12; he's got alot of ability. 175 for Ramsey on the other hand... Plays on the right actually does Lamela, and 175 is over the top. I watch him every week, guy has scored 6 goals, but boy he's average far too often. If he's 175 Munaian should be 185. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grafton83 Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Could be very wrong Jambo but I think it goes something like this -10 = Random PA between 180-200 -9 = Random PA between 160-180 -8 = Random PA between 140-160 -7 = Random PA between 120-140 -6 = Random PA between 100-120 -5 = Random PA between 80-100 -4 = Random PA between 60-80 -3 = Random PA between 40-60 -2 = Random PA between 20-40 -1 = Random PA between 0-20 Would love to know if that's right I wish they wouldn't have fixed attributes for potential in the game or a way of randomising potential ability within a range. In reality your actual ability will be a reflection of how much you've practised each particular skill. A player can choose the amount of time, concentration and effort they put into practising something so it shouldn't be a fixed attribute. If your practising your skills with or against a higher standard of opposition or with good direction from a coach you'll improve at a quicker rate as you can learn more in a shorter space of time in those cases but essentially your potential is only limited by how much you learn. Nobody is born with World class skills it's all learnt through practise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purefun Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 That would mean a ******** of micro-managing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Could be very wrong Jambo but I think it goes something like this-10 = Random PA between 180-200 -9 = Random PA between 160-180 -8 = Random PA between 140-160 -7 = Random PA between 120-140 -6 = Random PA between 100-120 -5 = Random PA between 80-100 -4 = Random PA between 60-80 -3 = Random PA between 40-60 -2 = Random PA between 20-40 -1 = Random PA between 0-20 Would love to know if that's right I wish they wouldn't have fixed attributes for potential in the game or a way of randomising potential ability within a range. In reality your actual ability will be a reflection of how much you've practised each particular skill. A player can choose the amount of time, concentration and effort they put into practising something so it shouldn't be a fixed attribute. If your practising your skills with or against a higher standard of opposition or with good direction from a coach you'll improve at a quicker rate as you can learn more in a shorter space of time in those cases but essentially your potential is only limited by how much you learn. Nobody is born with World class skills it's all learnt through practise. close .. its : -10 = 170-200 -9 = 150-180 -8 = 130-160 -7 = 110-140 -6 = 90-120 -5 = 70-100 -4 = 50-80 -3 = 30-60 -2 = 10-40 -1 = 0-30 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRL88 Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Should ***SPOILERS*** or something like that not be in the title? Just in case people don't want to see it?!?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 the title is pretty self explanatory really isnt it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRL88 Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Well yes but you know what some people are like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveUK Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Not seeing Wanyama on any of the lists, does he not have very good potential? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 he has as set potential steve.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveUK Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Ah ok, thought he would be on this list is all, cheers for the reply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Should ***SPOILERS*** or something like that not be in the title? Just in case people don't want to see it?!?! Not really, no Title is very self explanatory, and if they don't know what the title means and come in and see the list, they still wont know what that means. So no harm done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajj 7 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Nice, Saints start with 3 top young talents straight away. Ward-Prowse and Shaw both -9's and Ramirez with a 175 PA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 jesus... TY... you still alive? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 jesus... TY... you still alive? Very much so. Ohhhhh look at the fancy moderator Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigman Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 appreciate this thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kompunetsa Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 no -10 young man? oh no.. why do they give at least 1 player -10 PA? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Because -10 would signify that there is currently someone good enough to be as good as messi.... there aren't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajj 7 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Anyone know what Victor Andrade's PA is? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
iknowniknuk Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Because -10 would signify that there is currently someone good enough to be as good as messi....there aren't. Curious. Was Messi -10 when he was first in FM? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_bob Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Anyone know what Victor Andrade's PA is? His PA is only -8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Curious. Was Messi -10 when he was first in FM? No, In the past there were several -10's. Experience has taught SI to tone it down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tajj 7 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 His PA is only -8 Ok thanks, max potential 160 then, might have scuppered my plans! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baptista_8 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Anyone know the PA of Bonatini at Juventus, and Alphonse Areola? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Anyone know the PA of Bonatini at Juventus, and Alphonse Areola? -8 for both Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baptista_8 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Thanks Areola not as highly thought of as before then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Probably true of real life as well though in fairness Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
swisso Posted November 8, 2012 Share Posted November 8, 2012 No,In the past there were several -10's. Experience has taught SI to tone it down. Not really, if the Researchers think one of their players deserves a -10 and the Head Researchers agree, then so be it. There's very little outside influence on the process but naturally everyone exerts caution rather than dishing out amazing PAs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillip Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 does anyone know the potential of Marc Muniesa from barca please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welshace Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Not really, if the Researchers think one of their players deserves a -10 and the Head Researchers agree, then so be it. There's very little outside influence on the process but naturally everyone exerts caution rather than dishing out amazing PAs. Researchers have guidelines to adhere to regarding changes though no? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dngrs Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 great post! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.