rekluse Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 Download: http://www.filefront.com/16759521/klundstraining.zip These are training schedules I created for 2010 based on the position roles and duties introduced in this years game. Each schedule is tweaked based on the attributes highlighted for each role and duty listed on the tactical screen, then weighted based on which training routines raise the more important attributes for that position. These have been tested on top flight teams only, with Valencia, Aston Villa, Willem II and Frankfurt. Lower league teams may need to lower the fitness training a bit for specific schedules, like Target Man for example which has higher fitness training than the other striker schedules. These schedules work year round without the need to tweak schedules for pre-season or post-season. If certain players are becoming increasingly tired throughout the season, especially towards the end of a season, they should be rested and/or placed in a schedule with less strenuous fitness training. The following is a list of the training schedules: ST = Striker Complete Forward Advanced Forward Target Man Poacher Trequartista Deep Forward - Attack Deep Forward - Support Defensive Forward W = Winger Inside Forward - Attack Inside Forward - Support Advanced Playmaker - Attack Advanced Playmaker - Support Winger Wide Midfielder M = Midfielder Inside Forward - Attack Inside Forward - Support Advanced Playmaker - Attack Advanced Playmaker - Support Deep Playmaker - Support Deep Playmaker - Defend Box to Box Ball Winner Central Midfielder DM = Defensive Midfielder Defensive Midfielder Anchor Man D = Defender Wing Back Full Back Central Defender GK = Goalkeeper Goalkeeper Youth training is handled differently. Based on the position there are different schedules, one which is either strength or aerobic heavy, one which is less fitness heavy but more skill heavy and then one balanced schedule. Full Back schedules however are either for attacking full backs, defending full backs or a balance. The rotation I have been using for youth players is the following: I. 3 months in a fitness heavy schedule for their position at the start of the season II. Followed by 6 months in a balanced schedule III. Then ending with 3 months in a skill heavy schedule for the latter parts of the season and off-season These are general guidelines, I have certain players that I keep in fitness heavy schedules for 9 months of the year and others which I keep in skill heavy schedules, it depends on the type of player your trying to develop. Rotating them into these fitness heavy schedules has worked progressively better in my save games than keeping them in a balanced schedule year round. Youth Training: F = Forward Strength Aerobic Skill Balance W = Winger Aerobic Skill Balance AM = Attacking Midfielder Skill Balance M = Midfielder Aerobic Strength Skill Balance DM = Defensive Midfielder Strength Skill Balance FB = Full Back Defending Attacking Balance DC = Central Defender Strength Skill Balance GK = Goalkeeper Fitness Skill Balance TO INSTALL: Download the zip, extract, and place both .tsh files in the folder located in My Documents > Sports Interactive > Football Manager 2010 > schedules When in game go to schedules > manage schedules Then import both files and all the schedules will be available Download: http://www.filefront.com/16759521/klundstraining.zip Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruin Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 going to try this with bristol rovers, about 10 games into the season. I was using DS training which seemed ok. will let you know how it goes later Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 I appreciate it. I know it works very well for top flight teams but have not tested it for lower league teams but I expect it to work just as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karax268 Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 These look great I'm going to give them a try now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
qadsawee79 Posted December 2, 2009 Share Posted December 2, 2009 Thanks rekluse really appreciate it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted December 3, 2009 Share Posted December 3, 2009 Thanks! Gonna try this out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimi Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 any feedbacks? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 I've tried these schedules on several different saves and they work well, great work Rekluse! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheMan999 Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 Wow. Thank you so much. Was going to do something similar when I got home today. Now I don't have to! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProZone Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 rekluse, Could you explain, in a bit more detail, your thinking behind these training schedules. I'm just interested in the full-time schedules for now. In particular, I'd like to know how/why you chose the settings you did for a particular role, even if it was just trial and error based and observation on which stats improved or declined. Or did you have a more 'calculation' based method? Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahimagic Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 Cheers for this. I usually like doing my own schedules, but I'll just use these while I get acclimatised to the game, which appears very different to the FM07 game which I stood by for so many years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 9, 2009 Author Share Posted December 9, 2009 rekluse,Could you explain, in a bit more detail, your thinking behind these training schedules. I'm just interested in the full-time schedules for now. In particular, I'd like to know how/why you chose the settings you did for a particular role, even if it was just trial and error based and observation on which stats improved or declined. Or did you have a more 'calculation' based method? Cheers What I did was first wrote down all the skills recommended for each position by SI, which are the ones highlighted when you choose the position. I then put them into categories based on which training that skill fell under. For example, Poacher would look like: Dribbling - Ball Control Finishing - Shooting First Touch - Ball Control Anticipation - Tactics Composure - Shooting Off The Ball - Tactics Acceleration - Aerobic Agility - Aerobic Balance - Aerobic Pace - Aerobic 2x Ball Control 2x Tactics 2x Shooting 4x Aerobic Then I take into consideration the role a Poacher plays, defensive roles are almost non existent. So defending training is on light, lower than most of the other ST training sets. Attacking, Training and Strength are all on minimal medium since they are all useful but not nearly as important as other attributes. With aerobic being such a key stat for Poachers, it is on high while strength is on minimal medium. Tactics and ball control are both important so are on high. Then shooting, while also being 2x, is a very key attribute for Poachers and also shooting only raises 3 attributes but 2 of which are key attributes, composure and finishing, and one is very helpful, longshots (especially for this patch). So shooting is on very high. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProZone Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Thanks, much appreciated. I've been having a look at training for some time now and the addition of player roles to the game has made designing schedules based on role type an obvious step. I was naturally very glad to see this thread. I am toying with the idea that the number of attributes in each training category should affect the level of training assigned. Do you have any thoughts on this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProZone Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 I've copied a post I made elsewhere to help explain what I mean... Strength - Natural fitness, stamina, strength and work rate. Aerobic - Acceleration, agility, balance, jumping, pace and reflexes. Say we want to improve the two attributes shown in purple, strength and jumping, for a given player. The strength attribute is in the Strength category along with three other attributes making a total category size of four. Jumping is in the Aerobic category along with 5 other attributes making a total category size of six. My idea is that in order to improve both strength and jumping by, let's say, a single point then the schedule should be set to train the Aerobic category at a higher level than the Strength category. The rationale is that the Aerobic training effort is split six ways whereas the Strength effort is split only four ways. Expressing this in a mathematical sense, to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount, the Aerobic training category should be set (6/4 = 1.5) 50% higher than the Strength category. Let me just explain this a bit further. I don't mean Strength on notch 10 and Aerobic on notch 15. If we say that position 12 on any training category is a 'maintain' level, then if we want to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount then we would/should set the Strength category to position 14 (+2 clicks) and Aerobic to position 15 (+3 clicks). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Beckham_7 Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 If i have an AMC with attack role, which schedule should i fit him in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 12, 2009 Author Share Posted December 12, 2009 If i have an AMC with attack role, which schedule should i fit him in? One of the M - Roles, depending on his role. Currently my AMC is an advanced play maker, support, so hes in the M - Adv Ply Sup. In my Valencia game for example, Silva is an Inside Forward Support in the AMC role so he trains in the schedule M - Ins Fwd Sup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 12, 2009 Author Share Posted December 12, 2009 I've copied a post I made elsewhere to help explain what I mean...Say we want to improve the two attributes shown in purple, strength and jumping, for a given player. The strength attribute is in the Strength category along with three other attributes making a total category size of four. Jumping is in the Aerobic category along with 5 other attributes making a total category size of six. My idea is that in order to improve both strength and jumping by, let's say, a single point then the schedule should be set to train the Aerobic category at a higher level than the Strength category. The rationale is that the Aerobic training effort is split six ways whereas the Strength effort is split only four ways. Expressing this in a mathematical sense, to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount, the Aerobic training category should be set (6/4 = 1.5) 50% higher than the Strength category. Let me just explain this a bit further. I don't mean Strength on notch 10 and Aerobic on notch 15. If we say that position 12 on any training category is a 'maintain' level, then if we want to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount then we would/should set the Strength category to position 14 (+2 clicks) and Aerobic to position 15 (+3 clicks). If that's the player your trying to create then yes, the problem is they can only gain so many attributes and some they don't need for their position will just waste their PA points. For midfielders I tend to keep tactics at a high level since they raise easily and are all very helpful but then I'll have another schedule for those players that already have high attributes in this area and I'd rather focus on other attributes. For some midfield roles, or a complete forward, then I agree it would be beneficial to have them in schedules to raise as many attributes as possible since nearly all are needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magica_Milan Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 Nice work rekluse. Very interesting idea here with this training schedules. Keep up the good work Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Beckham_7 Posted December 12, 2009 Share Posted December 12, 2009 One of the M - Roles, depending on his role. Currently my AMC is an advanced play maker, support, so hes in the M - Adv Ply Sup. In my Valencia game for example, Silva is an Inside Forward Support in the AMC role so he trains in the schedule M - Ins Fwd Sup. Erm, my AMC is simply, attacking midfielder, attack. So, which one do you think fits in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 13, 2009 Author Share Posted December 13, 2009 Erm, my AMC is simply, attacking midfielder, attack. So, which one do you think fits in? AM - Adv Ply Atk The Advanced Playmaker - Attack is basically the same as an Attacking Midfielder - Attack. The difference is Acceleration and Work Rate for the AM instead of the Anticipation and Teamwork for the playmaker, so I didn't make a separate schedules for the two, I forgot to mention that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
meyer Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 anybody having good results with these schedules? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 anybody having good results with these schedules? Yes, I am. Highly recommended! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phnompenhandy Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 Brilliant. This will work well with Prozone's utility. I'm going to trial the schedule with my VERY lower league team - 10th tier of my British league! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Almondo Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 looking at this I think I have to give these schedules a try. Will download when I get hoem from work Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
likeabawss Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 i'm picking up a ridiculous amount of injuries, such that i barely have enough players to accommodate a normal squad with a normal amount of subs. is this normal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 i'm picking up a ridiculous amount of injuries, such that i barely have enough players to accommodate a normal squad with a normal amount of subs. is this normal? That's because injuries were increased with the latest patch, to bring them more in line with real life levels. I suggest you make sure you have a large first team squad with adequate cover for each position (I usually have 23-24 players in my squad). Also maybe take a look at your tactics... do you play attacking football with a high tempo, high closing down and lots of forward runs? If your players are too tired they'll pick up more injuries. I find that using the "retain posession" and "take a breather" shouts for part of the match helps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
likeabawss Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 that's not it at all. my previous training schedule was on the lowest setting of very heavy and injuries were very rare, even with the new patch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 that's not it at all. my previous training schedule was on the lowest setting of very heavy and injuries were very rare, even with the new patch. Then I don't know what it is, but as this schedule isn't on "heavy intensity" that surely can't be the problem then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted December 21, 2009 Author Share Posted December 21, 2009 I just now am starting a new 10.2 game to test and will update as needed, anyone else using these schedules with 10.2 any feedback is appreciated. Especially needing updating is GK training since 10.2 "Added Composure and Concentration to be included in Goalkeeper training". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
6Xavi6 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 Really impressed with the effort you put into this training schedule and I have just started a new game with this schedule and will let you know how it goes. Looking forward to other users results and feedback with this schedule as well as I haven't had alot of time to play with the holidays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProZone Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 These schedules seem to be getting plenty of positive feedback. Could I ask that those of you having success in developing players for specific roles post some images showing the improvements. I'm very interested to see if the schedules manage to target the key attributes, for each role, for improvement. I must admit that I donwnloaded these schedules when they were first posted but haven't managed to find the time to test them for myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFraser Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 I have not had the time to test these schedules either but there are a couple of points that I think should be brought up, considering this particular line of the discussion. I've copied a post I made elsewhere to help explain what I mean...Say we want to improve the two attributes shown in purple, strength and jumping, for a given player. The strength attribute is in the Strength category along with three other attributes making a total category size of four. Jumping is in the Aerobic category along with 5 other attributes making a total category size of six. My idea is that in order to improve both strength and jumping by, let's say, a single point then the schedule should be set to train the Aerobic category at a higher level than the Strength category. The rationale is that the Aerobic training effort is split six ways whereas the Strength effort is split only four ways. Expressing this in a mathematical sense, to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount, the Aerobic training category should be set (6/4 = 1.5) 50% higher than the Strength category. Let me just explain this a bit further. I don't mean Strength on notch 10 and Aerobic on notch 15. If we say that position 12 on any training category is a 'maintain' level, then if we want to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount then we would/should set the Strength category to position 14 (+2 clicks) and Aerobic to position 15 (+3 clicks). The first point is that while each category will divide the CA being distributed for that category equally amongst the attributes in that category, each position a player can play in has a different CA weight for attributes leading to a situation where equal quantities of CA distributed throughout a category leads to unequal quantities of Attribute increases. Fixed the table...Plus.. I agree with kolobok. Best thread on the forums (imo). Anything that keeps it alive is a good thing Att/ Posn GK DR/L WBR/L SW DC DMC MC AMC MR/L AMR/L ST Training category Acceleration 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 Aerobic Agility 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Aerobic Balance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Aerobic Inj Prone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jumping 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 Aerobic Natural Fitness 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Strength Pace 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 Aerobic Stamina 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Strength Strength 3 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 4 Strength Corners 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Set pieces Crossing 0 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 2 Set pieces Dribbling 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 3 Ball control Finishing 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 4 Shooting First touch 1 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 Ball control Free kicks 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Set pieces Heading 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 Ball control Long shots 0 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 Shooting Long throws 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Set pieces Marking 0 3 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 Defending Passing 1 2 3 3 2 4 4 4 3 2 2 Attacking Penalties 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Set pieces Tackling 0 4 3 2 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 Defending Technique 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 Ball control Versatility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aggression 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anticipation 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Tactics Bravery 4 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Composure 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 Shooting Concentration 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 Defending Consistency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Decisions 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 Tactics Dirtiness 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Flair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ball control Imp Matches 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iinfluence 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off the ball 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 4 Tactics Positioning 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 2 Tactics Teamwork 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 Tactics Creativity 1 2 2 2 1 3 4 4 3 3 2 Attacking Workrate 1 2 2 1 2 4 3 3 3 3 2 Strength Aerial ability 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Goalkeeping Command of area 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tactics Communication 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tactics Eccentricity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Handling 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Goalkeeping Kicking 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Goalkeeping One on ones 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Goalkeeping Reflexes 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aerobic Rushing out 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tactics Tend to punch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Throwing 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Goalkeeping Read: 0 - is free attribute for this position 1 - least weight for position ... 6 - heaviest weight for position. Hope this helps you pinpoint the formulas. Note that the degree of proficiency in a position reflects on the CA. Thus, a 20 in ST with 20 in AMC will actually reflect 50% of the above weights for ST and 50% for AMC. The second point is that while the above table may be correct, it is missing a vital mechanic to accurately replicate the exact behaviour of attribute development, especially over time and according to age. I am convinced that Age acts as a modifier on attribute weights to produce a situation where a particular attribute can have a large/small positive or negative affinity for CA depending on the age of the player in question. For example an 18 year old Centreback may have a positive modifier for his 6x Acceleration Attribute Weight, whereas the same player at Age 30 is now experiencing a negative modifier for his 6x Acceleration attribute weight. For example age 18 might be 6x(1), age 20 might be 6x(0.5), age 24 might be 6x(0.1), age 26 might be 6x(-0.1), age 28 might be 6x(-0.5) and age 30 might be 6x(-1). The third point is the impact of CA gain/loss/maintainance on the pattern of CA distribution through training. CA gain would produce a different pattern of CA distribution through training than CA maintained at it's previous level. This would imply that absolute values for Attribute Changes are not possible to obtain for entire Training Schedules as an absolute value for one Category would alter the distribution within other Categories dependent upon whether or not CA has changed and by what quantities. While eventually it should be possible to accurately compute the exact details of Training schedules for players each time CA changes, the amount of switching back and forth to obtain absolute values from a specific utility would be quite time consuming, especially for multiple players. Therefore it may simply serve the overwhelming majority of players to understand Training as the rough shaping of attributes over time, and understand the underlying mechanics in an accurate but general way. My idea is that in order to improve both strength and jumping by, let's say, a single point then the schedule should be set to train the Aerobic category at a higher level than the Strength category. The rationale is that the Aerobic training effort is split six ways whereas the Strength effort is split only four ways. Expressing this in a mathematical sense, to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount, the Aerobic training category should be set (6/4 = 1.5) 50% higher than the Strength category. Let me just explain this a bit further. I don't mean Strength on notch 10 and Aerobic on notch 15. If we say that position 12 on any training category is a 'maintain' level, then if we want to improve the strength and jumping attributes by the same amount then we would/should set the Strength category to position 14 (+2 clicks) and Aerobic to position 15 (+3 clicks). So here for example I would agree with the general principle of accurately matching ratios to obtain a particular shape, but I would disagree with the idea that this could be used to manage individual attribute point gains. Certainly at the moment this kind of accuracy is a long way off because the actual mechanics of CA distribution and player development in complete are not accurately known even if they can be generally stated. I would completely disagree with any theory that states that there are universal Schedule Positions for Maintain for attributes because of the very fact that CA changes on a regular basis, and the fact that Age alters the apparent weight of attributes. There will ofcourse be schedule positions for each individual player to maintain particular attributes, but you cannot maintain all attributes in a category, maintain all attributes equally, or currently work out where that maintain level is for any attribute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ProZone Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Another great post SFraser and I agree with all the points made. On your critique of my earlier posts, I should say that between then and now I have read a huge amount of training research and have moved well away from that particular line of thought. I have in previous posts, in this thread and others, mused out loud on my desire to find/develop role specific schedules. I am absolutely in favour now of individual schedules, to promote strengths and target weaknesses in role critical attributes, because with what I understand I cannot see a scenario where a 'one size fits all' set of schedules will get the best development through training for a squad of players. That said, the views above are my own and I salute the efforts of rekluse here. I am still interested to see the good results from those using these schedules and by no means do I wish anyone reading this to be discouraged from giving them a try. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bennetto Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 great training schedule mate, much better than mine i made currently using it with my newcastle team... will let you know how its working when ive used it abit longer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
likeabawss Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 are you just supposed to leave the training as it is straight from the download or do you increase the intensity of the training? i'm wondering since my attributes seem to be decreasing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick1408 Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Has there been any advance on these? I seem to have some modest success with various schedules but some more insight would be helpful. I am trying to train a defensive winger so I have him set on the DM training in hope it trains him up sufficiently with another on the wide midfield training to see the results Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathxxx Posted February 23, 2010 Share Posted February 23, 2010 Great effort rekluse and thank you for sharing your work with everyone on the forums. The principal appeal for me with this set of position and role orientated schedules, is that whilst I'm managing a lower league club, I see the importance and benefits of concentrating training on the key attributes I want in each part of my tactical system. The same of course can be said at big clubs, though lower league players, generally don't have the luxury of good attributes across the board. I have to say that over the years, even though I've always been comfortable creating and fine tuning tactics, I've never paid much attention long term to training schedules. It's just something that I've not had the patience to work on with smaller clubs, which are often too much of a revolving door when it comes to players and staff, to justify the finite effort. I usually tend to opt for something, which at the very least, maintains the abilities of the players I've signed. At big clubs, great facilities, coaches and quality players, with generally more stable and long-term player development aims, then I do try to pay more attention to training schedules. Sadly, I've never been a great mathematician, therefore I usually tend to look at the posts of some of the great posters who have concentrated their efforts on training. Generally though, I think it's an area of the game that causes great confusion, thus is often neglected. This will inevitably lead to people having players that never quite reach their optimum potential. It's something I think I've mentioned in the past, when the concept of a Tactics Creator/Wizard tool was first in discussion stages. Maybe there's potential for something similar for setting up training schedules (if it's possible to implement in the structure of the game) in future releases. It's certainly something I'll mention again when I get to discuss things, once I get involved in beta testing again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepydude Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 I heard the original link is dead. In case anybody still wants these schedules (which I still use with good results), I've uploaded it here: http://www.filefront.com/16184573/RekluseTraining.zip . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekluse Posted June 15, 2010 Author Share Posted June 15, 2010 Here's an updated link: http://www.filefront.com/16759521/klundstraining.zip Updated the original post as well. I originally planned on making a new version for the patch but after testing the differences were minimal at best so I am leaving the schedules the same since I had much more extensive training with these schedules as well as consistent success. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finknottle Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 rekluse, the download link shows an error and will not download. Can you assist, please? Kind regards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keniris Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 hello, link does not seem to work, could someone upload it again please? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMF Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 yes plz i wanta give it try too ~ thank you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.