Crayons Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Thinking of selling Bogdan Stancu in the second second season (8.0.2), Barcelona among other clubs have shown intrest but Stancu isn't as great as he once was on previous versions. How much should I look to sell him for and who should be his replacement? Preferably English talent, thinking of Vaughan. I'm QPR in the Prem btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazza Pee Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Why English, why not British or Scottish? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Scottish is British, mate, as is Welsh or Northern Irish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
arsenal_2111 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Originally posted by Frazza Pee:Why English, why not British or Scottish? Why does it matter? Yes, Vaughan would be a great choice, but Walcott is also great. Not sure if either of them will want to join you though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazza Pee Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 James McFadden oh wait you want English players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricCOYB Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Because he's an english team maybe? a scottish player is just as foriegn as a player from paraguay tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazza Pee Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Then why do your teams steal half of our players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kel-9 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 i didnnt know scotland only had 40 players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crayons Posted May 31, 2008 Author Share Posted May 31, 2008 Why are you having a go at us Frazza? English or British, would be good, Vaughan wants to come though. How much should I be looking to sell Stancu for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kel-9 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 it all depends on how he has done if very well 10 million if he has done allright 5million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 British Strikers: Andy Carroll - very strong in the air and a good player Kyle Lafferty - like Carrol James Vaughn - good player, can playon the floor or challenge in the air Frazier Campbell - quick Kris Boyd - not as good on the game as he is in real life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Edwards Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 English is the better out of british isles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Edwards Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 - That was to answer Frazza's question. James Vaughn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Originally posted by Jack Edwards:English is the better out of british isles. Eh are they really, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theincrediblehulk Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Stop bloody arguing for stupid reasons people. The guy wants some ENGLISH talent so recommend that to him or else dont bother posting. Frazza Pee, stop taking it personally fgs! Anyway Crayons, if you want English, try James Vaughan like people recommended. He's in my Arsenal team atm and doing great. - If West Ham somehow went down, you can try to get Dean Ashton off them. Absolute beast he is. - Billy Sharp is another one you could go for. Will definitely come to you (unless he's moved that is). - Peter Crouch is a surprisingly good player. But doubt he'll come to you. - Andy Johnson is another one but again, will probably not be interested. - Jermaine Defoe. Might be interested. If Pompey went down, then definitely. - Matt Derbyshire is also pretty good. Might come too if you give him first team football. - You can also try to loan in players like Scott Sinclair, Rhys Murphy or Frazier Campbell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 Originally posted by adamj11:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Jack Edwards: English is the better out of british isles. Eh are they really, </div></BLOCKQUOTE>Any response jack Edwards? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricCOYB Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 i don't think it really needs one tbh we could do a poll to see who everyone thinks is the best in the british isles but i feel the result may be slightly one-sided this little arugement all started because you couldn't just accept that he wants english talent, even though he is an english team just drop it please Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 I didn't you're scottish lad Frazza Pee did and then I just got annoyed when someone said England are better despite all evidence pointing to the contary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macsoz Posted May 31, 2008 Share Posted May 31, 2008 why arguee who is the better football team irl i'm scottish and its easy to see that england have the best players in their national team by a mile. if ur not english u shud just be happy that they have underperformed for years and years now like us scots have overperformed. you can easily win the world cup and euros with england. terry ferdinand lampard gerrerd ronney are amoung the best players in the game an thts to name but a few. anyway...if hes qpr he'll want english players for their hg status as like ericCOYB says Because he's an english team maybe?a scottish player is just as foriegn as a player from paraguay tbh. which will be true. sell stancu 10mil+ is a minuim. i think hulk suggeted the best options. deofoe is an fm favorite of mine also have a look at daniel sturidge and danny haynes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Man11 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by EricCOYB:Because he's an english team maybe? a scottish player is just as foriegn as a player from paraguay tbh. Not really to be honest, does someone from Paraguay have a British passport or sing the British national anthem (which for non sporting events is God Save the Queen for all of Britain) or speak English? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arathonas Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by adamj11:I didn't you're scottish lad Frazza Pee did and then I just got annoyed when someone said England are better despite all evidence pointing to the contary. A fluke result is an absolutely terrible argument. And if you're honestly arguing we're better than England with that as your "evidence" then frankly you don't even deserve your posts read. England have easily the best talent pool in the Isles. Originally posted by G-Man11:Not really to be honest, does someone from Paraguay have a British passport or sing the British national anthem (which for non sporting events is God Save the Queen for all of Britain) or speak English? FIFA don't care. All of the British Isles are seperate stats in their jurisdiction, see ManU dropping Schmeichal to be able to play Giggs back when the quotas existed, and the fact that players raised in seperate British countries don't count towards the homegrown rule. Scotland is foreign. That out of the way, Hulk gave most of the good ones but don't discount Ishmael Miller, Alan Smith (performs better than you'd think) and the Daves (Kitson/Nugent, both fairly decent players who play pretty well when they get consistent). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by Arathonas:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by adamj11: I didn't you're scottish lad Frazza Pee did and then I just got annoyed when someone said England are better despite all evidence pointing to the contary. A fluke result is an absolutely terrible argument. And if you're honestly arguing we're better than England with that as your "evidence" then frankly you don't even deserve your posts read. England have easily the best talent pool in the Isles. Originally posted by G-Man11:Not really to be honest, does someone from Paraguay have a British passport or sing the British national anthem (which for non sporting events is God Save the Queen for all of Britain) or speak English? FIFA don't care. All of the British Isles are seperate stats in their jurisdiction, see ManU dropping Schmeichal to be able to play Giggs back when the quotas existed, and the fact that players raised in seperate British countries don't count towards the homegrown rule. Scotland is foreign. That out of the way, Hulk gave most of the good ones but don't discount Ishmael Miller, Alan Smith (performs better than you'd think) and the Daves (Kitson/Nugent, both fairly decent players who play pretty well when they get consistent). </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Well lets see we were closer to qualifying for the Euros in a much tougher group, we beat Spain and drew with Sweden away and beat them at home, we have the record goal scorer in Euro qualifying history. Oh and we beat you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Oh and a team isn't considereed good by who is in it but by how they play, obviously England has the best player pool in the Britain it also has 30 times the population of NI and still couldn't beat them in their most recent encounter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reading\'s Revolving, Rant Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 This has been blown out of all proportion. I'm sorry, as much as i like scotland, i have to admit that England are probably the better team. For God's sake Adamj11 you cannot possibley keep reffering to one result. I'll tell you what, you keep putting that up and we'll bring 1966 into this when did Scotland win it last?? anyway, pointless arguments aside, Danny Haynes would be a good option. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adamj11 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I think it's quite clear I referred to more than one result above. Entertaining arguments aside I would say Vaughn or Carroll would be you're best options. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazza Pee Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 I'll tell you what, you keep putting that up and we'll bring 1966 into Then Scotland beat you right after that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reading\'s Revolving, Rant Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by Frazza Pee:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I'll tell you what, you keep putting that up and we'll bring 1966 into Then Scotland beat you right after that. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> But it doesn't matter, because we performed when it mattered. Look, neither of us qualified for the euro 2008 competition, so we're both S**t. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoStu94 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 England have the better team, but since it's filled with players that think they are too big for the country, they don't achieve as much. Capello is trying to show these players no one is now guarenteed a place in the squad by introducing players such as Lewis. Scotland on the other hand, don't have players as good as England, but play with their hearts on their sleeves, wearing the shirt with pride. It is a team, unlike England. Capello is changing this, and soon, if he does his job correctly, the will be a much biger difference in results the national teams give. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael91 Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by Reading's Revolving, Ranting, Ricochet:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Frazza Pee: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I'll tell you what, you keep putting that up and we'll bring 1966 into Then Scotland beat you right after that. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> But it doesn't matter, because we performed when it mattered. Look, neither of us qualified for the euro 2008 competition, so we're both S**t. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Na its just england thats sh*t considering the group you were in and our group. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reading\'s Revolving, Rant Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 Originally posted by michael91:<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Reading's Revolving, Ranting, Ricochet: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Frazza Pee: <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">I'll tell you what, you keep putting that up and we'll bring 1966 into Then Scotland beat you right after that. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> But it doesn't matter, because we performed when it mattered. Look, neither of us qualified for the euro 2008 competition, so we're both S**t. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> Na its just england thats sh*t considering the group you were in and our group. </div></BLOCKQUOTE> well, in 20 years time, pewople aren't gonna look back and think "oh, england didn't qualify, they're crap. Scotland didn't qualify, they're much better" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanhutton2cafuwho? Posted June 1, 2008 Share Posted June 1, 2008 jesus , the guy who posted this only wanted to find an English striker for his QPR team and people have to start asking why not British etc then it turns into an arguement over nothing , I pity yo fools Mate sign Vaughn or Sturridge , Fraizer Campbells a good wee player anoll ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedrobrazil Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I won't take much part in that discussion, since i´m brazilian and have nothing to do with that. All I can say is that I´m pretty sure England has the best players and should definetely be at the Euro, but i have to say i honestly think english players are absurdly overrated sometimes. England lacks a good striker to partner Rooney, since Owen's fitness is unreliable, and Defoe, Crouch etc. are not and will never be world class strikers. I also think that some players, mainly Frank Lampard, are slightly overrated by the world press and tend do disappear in some important matches. But that´s just my opinion. I´m sorry to say that, but i cannot stand watching a full Scottish League match, for me it looks like a bunch of ppl running around while the ball bounces from one side to the other until someone heads it in. As for the striker, get Billy Sharp. He is cheap and scored loads for any team, at any level in all games i had him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazza Pee Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 I´m sorry to say that, but i cannot stand watching a full Scottish League match, for me it looks like a bunch of ppl running around while the ball bounces from one side to the other until someone heads it in. Yes thats how Celtic/McGeady plays isn't it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam C Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 Originally posted by pedrobrazil:I won't take much part in that discussion, since i´m brazilian and have nothing to do with that. All I can say is that I´m pretty sure England has the best players and should definetely be at the Euro, but i have to say i honestly think english players are absurdly overrated sometimes. England lacks a good striker to partner Rooney, since Owen's fitness is unreliable, and Defoe, Crouch etc. are not and will never be world class strikers. I also think that some players, mainly Frank Lampard, are slightly overrated by the world press and tend do disappear in some important matches. But that´s just my opinion. I´m sorry to say that, but i cannot stand watching a full Scottish League match, for me it looks like a bunch of ppl running around while the ball bounces from one side to the other until someone heads it in. As for the striker, get Billy Sharp. He is cheap and scored loads for any team, at any level in all games i had him. Agree with you 100% there. England have better players, and should be in Euro 2008, but we had one BIG problem in Steve McMuppet. To be fair though, Scotland did better than us in Qualifiers, but what does it matter? We both did not qualify. And as pedrobrazil pointed out, loads of english players are overated. (Lampard, Rooney, etc And i'm english! Anyways, i also think Billy Sharp is a great player to get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vhayz Posted June 4, 2008 Share Posted June 4, 2008 can anyone show his print screen stats?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelessien Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 billy sharp england cant play like a team and lack passion in some players. as for scotland there ok considering their league isnt as attractive as the premier league but the atmosphere is gd there though. they did well at teh euros - better than england but england are miles.mile.miles better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluenose_92 Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 Originally posted by Frazza Pee:James McFadden oh wait you want English players. he wants a good player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larsson1888 Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 Whats the whole point in this bloody argument. The guy wanted an English player for a team based in England....whats wrong with that?? And who cares who is better or who has a better league... sick of seeing people starting arguments on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedrobrazil Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 That´s not an argument. Its a healthy discussion gathering different views from football lovers all around the world. Thats the point about football and one of the main things that makes it a worldwide passion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drhenry Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 "Healthy Discussion" or not, this is not the place to have it. Make a topic in a different forum if you must, but not in a topic in which a person asked for help, and only recieved a few relevant replies. I think Billy Sharp should be one of your main targets, it all depends on how much you can get for Stancu. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedrobrazil Posted June 5, 2008 Share Posted June 5, 2008 I agree its completely off topic...but together with my point o view i gave him some advice... BTW, in my Leeds save i have both Stancu and Sharp. Despite being a fan favourite and all, in my game Stancu gets 18 to 23 goals a season, while Sharp consistently delivers 30+. I think you´re better of with sharp than you are with stancu, the first being a lethal goalscorer, while the latter a skillful all around forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.