Jump to content

Jagr

Members+
  • Posts

    63
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jagr

  1. 23 minutes ago, Cloud9 said:

    Lack of penetrating runs forward, especially on the left hand side. MEZ(s) + CAR would be a more balanced approach w/out sacrificing too much structure.

    I'd consider reverting to a standard 3-5-2 for your trap inside instruction. Putting your playmaker in the 6 role as a regista on a mid block makes it easier to get the ball to him and provides defensive screening from the two 8's (BWM(s) + MEZ(s) would do the trick). The extra central defender will help you in build up play/defensive structure and the wide centerbacks/wide BPD's offer direct support to the wingbacks (who look a big isolated going forward as is). 

    Another option could be to play with a libero and a flat midfield three. That would keep more of your original 2 at 2-3-3-2 (at least in possession) while allowing the midfield 3 to focus on industry + forward runs. 

    On a final note: shorter passing can be difficult with a double striker pairing as they can get a bit isolated. I would try leaving the slider in the middle and play around with the PIs. Really like the choice of PF(s) you've got up top to link up the play, but he will benefit from more runs from midfield as well to help him join things up.

    Really, thanks. This is exactly what I was looking for. 

    Regarding tactic - are you thinking more like this (se attached picture). Be critical. 

    Namnlöst.png

  2. 2 hours ago, Johnny Ace said:

    What issues do you have with it?

    - Carrileros not covering up enough on the flanks
    - Sometimes hard to get the push

    It generally works fine - but I'm sure there are things to adjust. And it feels something is a bit off but I can't put the finger on it. 
    Would be great to get advices about the settings at In possession, in transition & out of possession. 

  3. Hi guys! 

    Any thoughts on possible improvements for this tactic?

    I find it generely good against most tactics / opponents - quite with high possession and xG. But I still think there are room for adjustments.

    Something that looks wrong to your eyes or something that could be improved? 

    - Roles that could be switched?
    - Settings for 'in possession'?
    - Must-have-settings for this tactic?
    - Or something that just looks off or counterproductive - let me know! :)

    Namnlöst.png

  4. On 28/04/2023 at 10:00, santy001 said:

    You can clearly see the condition is taking an impact, match load itself is just a display of what has happened recently. Whether it's displaying information or not, the players have still played the matches and had the impacts of this. Looking through my own game, either it may be somewhat tied to some level of analysis your club has or it may be a bug. I'm seeing it there for quite a number of players in my save, but equally there's a considerable amount it shows nothing for. 

    I just find it strange that my opponents doesn't need to rotate as much as I do.

    As soon as any of my players hit heavy match load - they get rest. While my opponents doesn't have to consider this. As soon as they're rested - they are fit to go for the next game.

  5. I use it about every other game.

     

    When the opponents both wingers have their stronger foot on the inside - I press/trap to the outside. 

    When the opponents both wingers have their stronger foot on the outside - I press/trap inside.

    You also need to consider that really offensive wing backs will be threatening from the outside (for the most). 

     

    When the opponent attacks both from the wing and also cuts inside - I leave it blank.

×
×
  • Create New...