Hi, I have a quick question about training. I worked out some training schedules for the different positions and they all required a 'Heavy' workload. After a while in my Backroom Advice meetings players started to complain about the heavy workload and my coaches recommended placing them on lighter schedules. However, when I looked at the effects of the training it was clearly having a positive impact (green arrows pointing up). After I switched the players to a lighter (Medium) schedule, they stopped improving (no green arrows and even a couple of red downwards arrows).
So my question is this... is it better to have players improving but complaining? Or should I stick to the medium workload / lighter schedule and accept they won't improve as much or as fast?
Quickfire Questions and Answers Thread (Tactic and Training Questions Only)
in Tactics, Training & Strategies Discussion
Posted
Hi, I have a quick question about training. I worked out some training schedules for the different positions and they all required a 'Heavy' workload. After a while in my Backroom Advice meetings players started to complain about the heavy workload and my coaches recommended placing them on lighter schedules. However, when I looked at the effects of the training it was clearly having a positive impact (green arrows pointing up). After I switched the players to a lighter (Medium) schedule, they stopped improving (no green arrows and even a couple of red downwards arrows).
So my question is this... is it better to have players improving but complaining? Or should I stick to the medium workload / lighter schedule and accept they won't improve as much or as fast?