I have some statistical data to back that up. In five games watched on comprehensive highlights, there were 141 highlights from set pieces (not including most throw ins and all penalties), compared to 43 highlights from open play (including deep free kicks and throw ins not directly leading to a chance). Also, 20 highlights ended in offside.
2nd Norwegian Division, not playing for set pieces (despite assistant begging for it every game).
Set piece highlights range from 31 to 25 a game, open play highlights from 7 to 12, so the variance is pretty low. The "best" ratio was 28-12, the worst 31-8.
It's a shame, because the match engine looks very good in open play, and not very good with set pieces (at least as far as defending goes). Corner defending is awful, defenders take ages to get back to their markers and stay clumped together in the box for an eternity. Free throw defending is also woeful in patches, as several attackers are just left alone in acres of space in the box. As it stands, games are boring/frustrating to watch because everything is way more predictable than it should be, and way more static to boot.