Mik_Fe

what do you need? sorry but i dont understaind if you need a suggestions for a team, for a tactic ora what..

I think so too... that's why it seemed strange to me!

with a CF-A it s better to have two IW-So or two IF-So? Which are your suggestions? behind they there two playmakers... I modify my tactic that i post above.. PI: SK: Pass it shorter WB:Cross from byline, run wide with ball, shoot less often, stay wider BPD: dribble mroe, shoot less often, mark tighter CD: Pass it shorter, mark tighter DM:Take fewer risks, hold position, tackle harder, mark tighter RPM: Dribble less, move into channels AP: Roam from position IF: mark tighter IW: take mnore risks, get further forward, mark tighter CF: pass it shorter Anyone can tell me if the position of roles are ok? i mean if AP it's ok in the same side of IW or not for example and if i can upgrade this tactic to will make better..!? Thanks I'm completely in confusion beacuse the strenght points of FM23 tactics, in this FM 24 the same tactics it's not the same, expecially in the defensive phase and in some matches also in offensive phase..

Does anyone know why if i put preset 4-3-3 tiki taka style the LOE is mid block than other 2 formation (4231 and 523) where the LOE is High Press?? It's bug or it s normal?

we pray for NO WAR and we pray for answer for this dioscussion

me too dzek...

i would to know too...

ok it s under review.. i hope that this options will return..

This tactic has got some PI? Beacuse at now I dont be able to create a 4231 and i want to learn it..

THANKS Aoyao

Other side of DLP

Okay, your answer is exactly the reasoning that led me to ask this question. . So, in defense I have two BPD-Co, which with HB I'm making a good ball spin, then I initially thought that a DM-De would create a triangle to get out the ball from behind, but HB gives me much more protection against counter of the opposition because I playing very high with the defense line. Given what Rashidi tells me, the best pair would be DLP-So and RPM right? Although my AP is a support it would be better a RPM that wanders and maybe dribble more (Iniesta type) and a DLP-So type Xavi. . could it be a nice midfield trio with HB? HB-DLP(S)-RPM. .

I think that your strikers dont receive decent balls to conversion in goal.. you are offensive, so very attacking mentality and very push forward your players on the pitch.. have you try to reduce mentality? Give more time for players to find a space where they will be dangerous..?!

Good question… The construction must start from the back, with CB and DM, WB remain wide and the AM goes down to receive ball, in the phase of possession I want a 2-4-3-1, with WB going up together with DM and AM passing the ball to the right and left in the pitch, it must rotate around him and around one of the two DM if he has marked. The striker doesn't want him to move much but he has to score and play the ball easy, the IW want to be mainly creators of occasion and then scorers. this is what i want, but.. i dont know if i chose the correct role..

tactic for possession football, it s better DLP-S and AP-S or RP and AP-S? other is a HB.. This year the HB remain into defend and create a three at back, and the other two for ex RPM and AP go into half space, DLP no.. Or i make a mistake? Which is the best option?

Man.. thanks for your tactic and your idea, but i need to create MY 4231, with my idea and my transition movement.. i dont want IFB, i dont want VOL and other things. I wanto to work for my 4231 and i need help to create this.. What s not work? all... i dont know how 4231 needs to work than example 433, i dont know which space i need, which role.. all... I need help for this... I create my 4231 with my idea but for now i dont see what i want and i need help for this..

How reliable is it to judge the effectiveness of a tactic if we simulate matches with the instant result button for an entire season?

in my opinion, how i know FM, if you train only for position and not for rolw, you can do this for example to train a new position (CB train to FB or DM).

yes, but nothing skill will improved in specific role, only by training group.. for me haven t sense to train a player only for position and not for the specific role.. my personal idea..

what do you mean? When you train a single player you must do put role and duty...

Guys... i try to create a 4231.. but i dont understaind the bases i think.. i'm disheartened.. I need help.. If anyone bring some times to help me, I would be grateful.. At the moment I created this tactical structure, so I'm not dissatisfied, because good results are coming anyway, but I'm not as satisfied as with the 433 or 3421 that I created, where I really enjoyed looking at them.. So........... 1] I started by trying WB-Defend but they were really not very incisive in the last third, so I changed to WB-S..and things seem to be going better in the offensive phase without leaving too many problems in the defensive phase (at least for now after 7 games in the championship - test with Sunderland) 2] Central defenders are fine, I like them as classics. 3] The two pivots (I lost my mind for days trying to figure out which is the best pair or the best combination for what I'm looking for, I chose the DLP and the classic DM, the BWM didn't give me the opportunity to be able to insert the PI" move forward", which I can do when I see certain situations in the game with the DM. The SV comes to play the attacking midfielder for me, leaving only the DLP and it's not something I want, because it also takes space for the freedom of movement of the AM and the internal cut of the inverted wing, so I discarded it as a hypothesis in the basic tactics. 4] The two offensive wingers, after reading and re-reading Rashidi's thread on role combinations, I opted for two IWs (two Sane to make myself clear), create chance and if he has possibility, try to score, it s ok for my idea... 5] Another role where I wasted time was the AMC, undecided between the AP and the AM. AP seems to me to lean more towards the two midfielders to receive the ball and spread out with passes (Ozil, Dybala or Eriksen came to mind), while the AM is more similar to a Bruno Fernandes or Kaka, who roam around the pitch to be incisive. 6] Then I always have many doubts about the attacker, dictated mostly by what the players behind him do, for example if I have the AMC moving in the channels, I don't want him to do it (so I choose poacher or target man) on the contrary all the others who move in the channels when the AMC doesn't do it, as in this case I chose the role that stretches the team the most for me, but I think that playing so high and looking for possession football, it would perhaps be better to choose a DLF or a TM who plays more with the team (CF would be the best but you need to have a player capable of having the skills). I'm not a fan of the 4231, but I want to look for one that works, that I can use with Bolton or with Como, or with United or with PSG, a tactic that can be a unique base regardless of where I want to use it. In the possession phase I'm noticing that it's a 2-4-3-1, and I like it, and what I want, although perhaps it would be best to have 2-4-1(AMC)-2(IW)-1, but little changes, in possession phase i think that i need to change littel little thing and the tactic it will be perfect for my idea... I ask help from all of you if you can give it to me, so that I can finish this crazy work that I can't seem to finish. Ask anything you want if you need to understand what I want to achieve. Thanks so much guys!!

I know.. i see the same.. it s a bug?

TI to encourage the team to use the central of the pitch, and meanwhile increase mentality of my WB and reduce mentality of IF. good tactic.. very good… little changes but the structure is the same..

yes.. depends which skill do you want to incrise into player.. looks every single tab of training and search which skill your player need.. i put my WB in offensive group..