Jump to content

newlearnerguy

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by newlearnerguy

  1. 52 minutes ago, Johnny Ace said:

    See, you've an IF(A) & a PF(A), the IF(A) will want to get into the positions the PF(A) is supposed to be in , like a double up of duties, two number 9s 

     

    is this a bad thing? I used an IF(a) and a PF(a) because I thought the striker would pull the opposing centre-backs and IF(a) strikes.

    and thank you for your help :thup:

     

     

    2 hours ago, smeagoltonez said:

    A BWM isn’t the best idea for a holding midfielder as he’ll leave his position to chase the ball with no DM behind to cover. I’d switch him to a CM(d). You could also use a DLP(d) if you have someone with good positioning etc & ball-playing skills. In that case I’d also recommend changing your AP to an AM to avoid having two playmakers close to each other. I’d avoid having both the AM & PF on attack duty, one or the other.

    As your formation is top heavy, I’d recommend giving PIs to your front four so that they close down as much as possible so that you win the ball back further upfield. For that reason I’d also recommend a higher LOE.

    Having two attacking sidemen who cut inside will also allow the position to pack the middle when defending against you. Consider keeping a winger to stretch the opposition.

    2 hours ago, DarJ said:

    I'll put the FB on the right, the WB on the left, change the AP to support or use a standard AM, standard LOE and I'll remove "work ball into the box"

    I'm taking off work ball into box because you are playing narrow and If you come against a defensive side you'll end up passing the ball around in a congested space and that's not effective. If you really want to use it then consider going standard width or maybe wider and be prepared to push the FBs forward 

    Thanks guys. I am trying.

  2. @mp_87 @Experienced Defender @dunk105 @ACKCHYUALLYSOCCERCOACH CJ_Randell

    thank you for all suggestions. I learned things i didn't know when i trying what you told. But i didn't get positions like IRL in FM21 i think this is mostly impossible because 

    2 hours ago, mp_87 said:

    The wide roles are the most difficult to get right in FM. They're expected to get back in behind the ball plenty, but then other times (strong or weaker opposition) they 'gamble' and don't get back in and are in positions waiting for the ball to be cleared and to counter. I don't think this is possible to replicate. They're also pretty fluid and will pop up over the field and I'm not sure the Roam from Position PI does enough justice to this.

    this one is happened to me a lot. But when i trying with Son is a AF and Kane CF(s) . I started to get the positions i wanted. But i know that the football i'm playing at the moment doesn't belong to Mourinho :lol::lol: 

    But I can say that I have difficulties with most of the team instructions. i can 't  decide which one is work for me especially attack width, passing style and goalkeeper transitons

  3. 9 hours ago, Atarin said:

    The thing about Spurs this season is that there's been some tactical flexibility. Depending on who's playing left back (Davies or Reguillon) and who's alongside Hjoberg (Winks or Sissoko)  and whether Bale is playing wide right or Moura.

    When Davies plays left back he's a FB(d) and that gives Hjoberg licence to support the transition as a DM(s). When Reguillon is playing he's a FB(a) and Hjoberg plays a much more conservative DM(d) or Anchor Man.

    Mourinho uses Dier as the BPD on the left and Alderweireld as a regular centre back on the right.

    Aurier and Doherty have mostly been used as WB(s). They don't get ahead of play early, they move up with the transition. They are a little more aggressive when Davies plays but they're still not part of the advanced attack.

    Winks, when he plays, is almost always a BWM(s) these days. His job is pressurising the player on the ball.

    Sissoko has had a number of roles under JM from babysitting the right back as a Carrilleiro/BWM(d) to a BBM getting Spurs up the pitch quickly all on his own.

    Ndombele has had three different jobs depending on the opposition. When Sissoko is missing its Ndombele's job to carry the ball as a CM(a)/BBM. When Sissoko is in the side then Ndombele wins the ball, gets it to the forwards and makes supporting runs as a BWM(s). He has also, at times, been paired with Kane as a sort of SS(a)/DF(s) operating as part of a two man front line in the defensive phase.

    Out wide there is a lot of variety. Son generally plays as an orthodox IF(a) but when you're trying to recreate his deeper defensive position in a flat midfield then you're probably better off playing him as a W(a) or IW(a). Bale hasn't played anything like a winger or inside forward so far, he's just not mobile enough at the moment. He's mostly playing as an AP(s). Moura operates as a DW(s) or an IW(a) depending on the situation. Lamela, when he plays, is an IF(a).

    Kane has played in a number of different roles depending on the circumstance. When Spurs are in control he plays as a DLF(a) or CF(s). He has also played as a TM(s), AF(a), F9, DF(s), DF(d) and even as a full blown attacking midfielder.

    I wouldn't think of a JM-Spurs recreation as tactic as much as a set of principles. The first and most important principle is that when Spurs take the lead, unless there is a very high chance of more goals, then Spurs go into a compact, direct counter approach with Kane taking up a DLF(s) position on the halfway line and the wingers dropping deep but always ready for a rapid counter off of a Kane control, pivot, release. Kane and Hjoberg are central to everything Spurs do. You want to be getting Kane dropping deep into midfield to create strong numerical advantage in that area. Everything else stems from that.

     

    You have been very helpful. thank you so much. what do you think of the team instructions?

×
×
  • Create New...