made_in_turkey4

Yes, I like a mirrored tactic, so i could discpline and helping balance the system on field. In my view, this is the "best" way to spur player to field, rather than choosing different roles , wich could lead to chaotic role distributing and negative assymetric positioning. But yeah .. this is my view..

In my view, sk d fb a bpd d bpd d fb a dlp d rpm s rpm s if a if a cf s / f9 s / dlf s with the right instructions, is my best preference, but i'm open to negative views for bettering myself ..

Thanks, I think i will just ignore the explanation given and continue with what I think should be right for my tactic ..

Thank you, I'm little bit getting sometimes annoyed with these things and really want to know if it's for the better for the tactic or not. I like to play 2 rpm's side to side, because of my personal preferences, but if the game says it's not good , then i think i'm doing something wrong.. But if you say as a moderator ( with all respect) that it's totally nothing wrong depending on your choise, then i'd continue with this tactic.

I'm sorry, 2x RPM's f.ex. are not working well together as my thoughts are different. To create a more preffered balanced tactic, it could be useful to divede symmetric balance over the field, as with 2x BPD 2x FB and 2x IF, f.ex. .

Hi, In attachment, Ihave a example of my preferred tactic; WCB can be (D) , depending on opponent. DM; Hold position & Shoot less often WB: Shoot less often MC: Shoot less often FC: Roam from position. I don't neccessarily think that having 2 same roles would block instruction(s) on field and have a negative effect on playing football. I see them as 2 separate blocks for having better and a helping simpler balance for your tactic. This simpler balanced tactic would in my opinion crash oppononents with the right players and management, as i experience through my FM save, with all respect. The only annoying thing is that the combination lines give me the roles " are far from suitable and do not work well together" explanation. Could this negative explanation disappear as i play more and more togheter with thes roles through a specific time?, .. wich i couldn't see beacause i feel annoyed after a while beacause of this. I would like to know your opinions why a symmetric tactic would not be "good" in FM, because this is what I hear and read, and as if FM says with the roles combination lines. Thank you.

Hi, I want to edit the match day's ; so don't want them only on f.e. sunday, but want them realistically spread for whole the weekend. Can someone help me with this pls? Would help me very well . Thanks.