Jump to content

Lasson

Members+
  • Posts

    175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lasson

  1. 4 hours ago, HanziZoloman said:

    thank you @Lasson one other question, how far does the L(S) venture?

    Passes received against AC Horsens (attacking from right to left)

    Spoiler

    image.png.771ab92c3ccb46e8e35602d14cec585f.png

    Passes received against Brøndby (attacking from left to right).

    Spoiler

    image.png.fde2c910490fafea9adecbfcd5eaaa2c.png

    Passes received against Bayern München (attacking from left to right).

    Spoiler

    image.png.f85e67cbebc959cd49057e188b1ce9d0.png

    If you want some pictures of anything else in regards to the Libero, just let me know. But as you can see from the passes that my L(s) received in my last three matches, he will move up quite a bit along with the rest of the team as we progress the ball.

  2. 2 hours ago, HanziZoloman said:

    @Lasson great game! Why do you chose FB(D) instead of IFB(D)? 
    and a DLF(A) with two wingers? 

    I do use IFB(d) on both sides making it a 3-2-5. I have zero traditional full backs on my team. This is the height of all of my defenders.

    image.png.d4722442fb3aab343cb13e6c75e44f5d.png

    I like using the DLF(a) to link up with the other players. I felt like the PF(a)/AF was getting isolated at times, and I don't see any problems using DLF(a) with two wingers on the sides. They will still make runs in behind and so will the CM(a) and BBM.

    Spoiler

    image.png.cec43d7683b052ee2d3f8181aff0a433.png

     

  3. Getting inspiration from another thread on this site as well, I have now settled on three seperate tactics within the 4-3-3 shape.

    image.png.732c59162b69439c101607bece036e3d.png

    Positive

    Spoiler

    image.png.164aff574a54ab575898c3dc670198bc.png

    Attacking

    Spoiler

    image.png.32394739f2333619bd139a904276e280.png

    Balanced

    Spoiler

    image.png.1c6a5dc20abce8fea30d9b5e1eb5d54c.png

    In 2028, I just played Bayern München in the Champions League Round of 16 and even though I lost 4-3 overall, I'm pretty satisfied with the overall play of the team and the tactic. I mainly used the Balanced setup for the two games, as they are, obviously, a much better side. Below are stats from the two games.

    Spoiler

    image.png.6005ca03902db0b0fb22669f49581d30.pngimage.png.dc93e1e77cca7eaa1960c7936e5b80d9.png

     

  4. I don't see any problems with the roles and duties. What you have on your screen is your defensive shape. With the roles and duties you have chosen, your shape will turn into a 2-3-5 when attacking. It will look like this. With the new positional play, you should not worry about the Libero moving up into the midfielders place as he will slide over to make room for the Libero in the '3' of your 2-3-5 shape.

    image.png.02bb22663b4ec7626736086b3cb0e9c4.png

  5. 8 hours ago, NineCloudNine said:

    Carrilero’s are great. They seem to act like a less gung-ho B2B. Nice balance between attack and defence.

    One thing I have noticed is that PPMs seem to affect how a player acts in those two roles more than for (eg) AP or DLP. I suspect this is because playmakers tend to have PPMs which amplify or emphasise parts of their role whereas B2B and Carrileros are more likely to have more individual traits, like long shots or tackling harder or getting into the box, which significantly affect how they play.

    Another difference between the CAR and the BBM is that the BBM will move into the AM strata as part of the positional play.

  6. This is my current 4-3-3, which is a 3-2-5 in the attacking phase. Originally, the RPM was a BBM, but I really like how the RPM drops a little deeper and helps in the initial build-up. Also, I felt like I had to use Christian Eriksen as some sort of playmaker after getting him to Copenhagen.

    I love having Inverted Full-Backs. I have zero traditional Full-Backs/Wing-Backs left in my squad and I only use Central Defenders and retrain them to be able to play on the outside.

    As for PI's, the DM have 'Hold Position' and both Wingers have 'Cut Inside With Ball".

    Spoiler

    image.png.eb4eb8952c8aee08de274a0bddc83088.png

     

  7. What is it that is not working?

    When creating my tactic, I tend to think about my offensive shape; how do I want my players to position themselves when I am in possession?

    With the ball I want the 4-2-3-1 to transition into a 3-2-4-1 shape and for that to happen, I have to use certain roles for the positional rotations to happen.

    Since I last posted this picture, I have made some slight tweaks, but the principals are the same. My IFB(d)'s together with the CD(d) are the back three with the L(s) pushing up alongside the DM(s) to create the double pivot. The VOL(a) pushes up into the AM strata occupying the left half space, making the AM(s) slide over to the right half space, while the wingers, obviously, are maintaining the width. 

    image.png.0d58ad3f3ab80ad1415b7691852df995.png.bbeb4d9955041d25910208188237a193.png

    Does it make sense?

×
×
  • Create New...