Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by magicnutt

  1. I won triple using vujevic's systems with hertha berlin third season. CL+ DFB-Pokal + League. Actually I won 3 back to back bundesligas including first season. Sadly I only managed quarter finals the second season in the CL (knocked out by man utd) but that season I won double cup+league. total of 6 big throphees won 3 Bundesligas 🏆🏆🏆 2 DFB Pokal 🏆🏆 1 Champions league.🏆
  2. The further improvement on free kicks , this is for all types of free kicks , including direct and non direct?
  3. In other words your highest player with free kick taking thats not the AMC or Striker got it.
  4. Hey there lad , who do you recommend take the free kicks in the new setup?you have corner takers set as wingers but no suggestions for the free kick takers. Also in the setup I see all the outfield players are assigned so again that could use some clarification.
  5. Lad there is no individual training specified specifically for raptor v4 and I dont recommend you use it either. Since raptor v4 far more efficient systems have been developed such as cerber v4 , and annihalator. As you see in the post the training for cerber v4 is just by the roles in the tactic so probably just set the players to the roles of raptor v4 if u insist on using it... I should also note that if I recall correctly raptor v4 was oriented for 20.2 patch and the never tactics are specifically oriented for this patch.
  6. Lad could you just manually upload a screenshot of the new throw in system so we can put it in ourselves if we like? Do you recon its the same throw in systems on all formations?
  7. Wow there lad , I hope it gets release asap looking forward to see how it does.
  8. AMC to CM and in what role lad??and how did u come up to this tactical renovation? I suggest if you want to hold to a result use the TFF shield wall
  9. Show us screenshot of the league table and game status making sure no editors used..
  10. If you have players already on yellows remove the tackle harder individual instruction or make a sub.
  11. As I mentioned in the reply I have a desire to but the beef aside , as long as the user doesn't instigate any more beef with me there are no more issues
  12. Lad first of all I want to say I have a desire to put our beef aside but that can only be achieved if you show more patience and tolerance and not try to desperately push your opinion through. "and even if I did" why can't you at least be man enough to say straight up that you did? Lets clarify a few things. When TFF makes a statement about a tactic such as estimating efficiency improvements , removing old less efficient tactics etc, TFF (as he expained on numerous occasions before) uses OBJECTIVE TESTING METHODS to ESTABLISH THE EFFICIENCY AND STATISTICS ABOUT A TACTIC.He doesn't go
  13. Lad here's the problem: While everything tff says might not necessarily be true one must choose who's words to believe based on my own judgement of the credibility of a person. When it comes to judging what tff says I give him benefit of doubt over ANYTHANG that you say. Again: just because tff say it doesn't mean its true doesn't mean it isn't also the other way around : just because you say it doesn't mean its true. Also check your inbox and read the message I wrote to you in private and kindly stop boasting about your "achievements" to try to warrant yourself credibility
  14. I was just calmly cutting to the Chase lad thats all..
  15. Lad you don't even know yet exactly what tff even proposed and yet you popped on here boasting about what you won and how many games you gone unbeaten and this and that and the third which I couldn't give a rat **** about and thats just me cutting to the Chase. Before estimating how much effort it will take I want to know specific propositions regarding the OI which tff mentioned would bring about a..2% in efficiency? even if that took 40 seconds a game for 2% in efficiency doesnt sound interesting.
  16. Thanks but now I'd like to hear a answer from knapp himself if possible
  17. can you quote me the answer or at least tell me which page of the 243 pages on this thread this was answered ?
  18. That for 2% efficiency increase doesn't sound like a worthwhile idea.. If you were to at least say to change oi's based on opponent formations I could go that far but to track things during a game and inspecting opponents is a bit overkill. If it was say 10% maybe i'd take it in consideration but not two I'll still upvote the post because I am curious to know what specifically you can suggest with the OI. Also would it be a bad idea to ask a assistant with extremely high tactical knowledge to do your OI as some ppl do?
  19. Dear Knapp: Which of your current masterpieces tactics do you regard as the most promising if I was to ask you to pick say top 5 of them?
  20. By lots of effort do you mean that OI should be for example set differently for different formations of the opposition and changed whenever you face a different opponent? If there are fixed OI's that even marginally improve the efficiency I am all for it. Even if there isn't I am sure that there would be people interesting in squeezing out every ounce of efficiency from a tactic and doing thangs in a proper manner.
  21. Lad theres absolutely nothing whatsoever even remotely proprietary or promising about those results you got on holiday goodness me its BARCELONA. If you had at least won throphees but not even that. By throphees I mean obviously league and cl.
  • Create New...