Jump to content

Antal

Members+
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Antal

  1. 18 минут назад, Tumppu сказал:

    Да, конечно. Я делаю изменения в матчах. И все же... осторожный менталитет принес наилучшие результаты даже против более слабых соперников. 🤔 Прошлый год позитива вообще был лучшим в моем опыте. Мой 

    I don't know how much this breaks tactics created with an offensive mentality, but with a defensive mentality I sometimes attack more often. Maybe it's because there are fewer ball losses, :embarrassed: and I can spend more time looking for attack options than defending after losing the ball

  2. 6 минут назад, knap сказал:

    @Количество

    Обычно может менять расстановку без смены игроков. Тактика SUS, вероятно, является наиболее радикальной сменой формации. Более легкие изменения — это менталитет или смена DM на HB.

    Тактика Плана Б может быть полезной, например, переход от широкого к узкому.

     Я заранее не планирую ИИ

    ME 23.1

    SUS Tactic , Is this a tactic to keep the desired result? downloaded

  3. Friends... At what point can you understand that your tactics are not working and you need to change them? Can't you create scoring chances? Or does the opponent create a lot of chances and you need to urgently change the scheme of the game?
    How much time is needed for this?
    The coordinate switching of the scheme requires massive replacements of players and doing it in the 1st half is also risky

  4. 5 hours ago, knap said:

    The only way to tell is to test the changed tactic..

    Tell me, is there any point in choosing your more convenient tactics for each opponent.
    For instance:
    against 442 - 4411 tea for one,
    against 4321 wide - 352 argus,
    against 442 thrombus narrowly - 2-3-3-2 MAD AS A HATTER
    and so on
    Will this all work or is it better to play an ode to tactics against everyone?

×
×
  • Create New...