Jump to content

The_Batmantis

Members+
  • Posts

    101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Issue Comments posted by The_Batmantis

  1. I'm having the same issue. Harry Kane has now missed 4 of the 5 penalties he has taken for me this season.

    It really feels like the penalty taking performance in the actual match is completely different from the success rate I'm seeing when non-player matches are simmed.

    Save:
    Ted Lasso - Tottenham Penalty.fm
     

    kanepen.PNG

  2. Man United 1st season defense feels completely overtuned (again).

    Default database and they are close to the best PL defense in history. 15 goals allowed in 31 matches.
    Compare that to reality where they have actually allowed 41 goals in 35...

    I know attribute updates are done for FM23, but surely we can't keep inflating them right?

    Anyone else seeing United perform like this since the update?

    UniteD.PNG

  3. @Michael Sant
    I'm confirming that my save running on 23.3.0 there is still an unresolved issue.

    When I'm "responsible" for training in the U21 team, I'm unable to change the tactic the U21 team is training on or using in matches.

    The option on the U21 tactic screen is greyed out and you cannot interact with it. The normal option that appears on the "Development Center" page is completely gone. This is also true for my U18 team.

    Save uploaded: Ted Lasso - u21Tactic.fm

    devcenter.PNG

    u21tactics.PNG

  4. @Michael SantI'm also having the same issue.

    I created and uploaded a recording.

    The example is, in the first instance I'm trying to exclude Tottenham (my club) players from the search. I'm looking for all fully homegrown players. Skipp and Kane are currently at my club and should be at the top of the list. But, no matter how many times I uncheck that box, they never appear.

    But, if I completely clear the search, and start a fully new search unchecking the box first, it seems to work.

    excludebug.mkv

  5. 29 minutes ago, Brentford Alan said:

     

    from our research guidelines for the jumping reach attribute;

     

    when considering his jumping ability, it makes sense to take into account the player's height.

    For example, a player of 200+cm will still possess a high reach even if he is a poor jumper, and a player who measures in at 170cm will struggle to compete at the same height due to the 30cm difference in height between the two.

     

    Please note that some players may be over rated in certain attributes and require a decrease.

    I think we need to realize that this sentence needs a small edit.

    >For example, a player of 200+cm will still possess a high reach even if he is a poor jumper, and a player who measures in at 170cm will usually struggle to compete at the same height due to the 30cm difference in height between the two.

    But, some players are unusual. I think Lucas is an unusual player because his jumping ability is exceptional.

  6. 2 hours ago, code-t said:

    Also, if you’d like me to compare similar players, here are the last three league seasons combined:

    0738A451-E084-4FA2-9E8D-68B8FEC37488.jpeg.5aea32c13c9d0b2a3a768c0d27a87d7e.jpeg

    I wonder how their in game stats compare. First touch, flair, dribbling and technique. 

    At game start

    Partey:
    FT=14, Flair=11, Drib=12, Tech=13

    Rodri:
    FT=15, Flair=9, Drib=13, Tech=14

    Fabinho:
    FT=16, Flair=11, Drib=13, Tech=15

    Frenkie:
    FT=17, Flair=15, Drib=16, Tech=16

    McTominay:
    FT=13, Flair=6, Drib=12, Tech=13

    Hojbjerg:
    FT=14, Flair=11, Drib=11, Tech=14

    Seems like Partey is pretty much in line with those peers. You could argue about 1 point here, or one point there, but it's marginal at best. It's not like it's completely out of line with the player he is. And, that doesn't account for other attributes that matter such as strength, acceleration, composure, decisions, etc.

  7. 1 hour ago, Brentford Alan said:

    Just to pick up on a commonly misunderstood attribute - jumping reach. It's relative to each player's height rather than a rating on how good he is at jumping, so he'll always be limited in how high he gets by his relatively low starting height. To put it another way a 20 jumping reach would mean any player of any height could reach the maximum height the game allows humans to jump to, say 8 foot for arguments sake, with lower scores being lower maximum heights (I don't know the exact figures for each attribute, sorry).

    His height is given as 1.72m and 11 is actually a very high jumping reach for his height, in fact higher than previous research guidelines would allow for this attribute which would have given him a maximum of 9 as per the attached chart which I still use as a template for 'my' players at Brentford.

    index.png

    Thanks for the info @Brentford Alan. But I'm still not fully understanding you. He outjumps players who have a "jumping reach" of 12, 13, 14 etc. We have repeated visual evidence of it.

    Therefore, shouldn't his jumping reach be higher than 11?
    End of the day, his height doesn't really enter into it. Its about how high he can jump. And he's incredible at it.

    If you want to talk about height, most sources put him at  about 172cm.
    Many elite athletes can make static vertical jumps of 70cm+ : https://nrpt.co.uk/training/tests/power/sergeant.htm

    Do that math and it's not unusual how he can elevate above even some CBs.

  8. Continuing my Spurs Mid-Season review. I'm now going to highlight some specific attributes or PPMs that I think are well wide of the mark for individual players.

    I'll start with a weird one. Lucas Moura. He's one of Spurs shortest players, but any Spurs fan knows his jumping ability is insane.
    At launch, he's rated with a "Jumping Reach" of 11 and I think that needs to be greatly increased.

    His goal vs. Man City: (4:45) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxmZuJBB2HQ

    His goal vs. Palace (0:50) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49I6QqF_z3A

    And this moment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49I6QqF_z3A

    The number of headers he wins is actually incredible for someone his height.
    He

    Can

    Jump

     

    Next I want to talk about a strange rating for Ryan Sessegnon. Currently he's rated a "8" in strength.

    This is far too low based on his play and it puts him, unfairly, in the same category as stick figure Bryan Gil.

    Sess is a capable defender who uses his body well to both keep and win the ball:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOzQd-UxrDE

    I would actually rate two of his best physical attributes as balance and strength. Both could easily be 14s. (but not a great jumper)
    I would however drop his "flair" from 14 down considerably, probably somewhere in the 10-11 range. His prime weakness as a wingback is taking safe options, and not being aggressive and unpredictable taking his man on with the ball. He's not one for trying tricks or skills moves. Spurs fans are still hoping he finds some of the form he used to show for Fulham in driving the ball forward, but that's not something he's particularly great at currently.

    Moving to Spurs other LWB Ivan Peresic, He's currently underrated in terms of crossing at "13"
    https://twitter.com/WhoScored/status/1573621514796089345

    https://i.imgur.com/Yb1epmz.jpeg

    He's quite simply the best crosser on the left in the league right now.
    However, his pace is not what is used to be at all. He's generally beating his man with feints instead of the speed he used to have.
    Crossing to 15-16 and pace to 13-14 would be more accurate IMHO. I think his finishing could also be ticked down a point or two based on some missed chances this season and sitting at zero goals for the season.

    Now I move to Christian Romero. I think there are a few parts of his game currently missing from his attributes and style in FM.
    He loves going past a man and going on adventures forward (example) Right now his dribbling and flair are "8". I don't know who thinks Ben Davies and Sanchez are better at dribbling but it's just not accurate.

    You can see in a lot of these highlights how far forward he actually is. He could probably use a PPM to reflect this. Not dissimilar from players like Vertonghen or Rudiger who love to venture forward and support the attack well above the defensive line. You can also see him calm on the ball, and finding a wide range of passes.

    Romero should also definitely have the PPM "winds up opponents". He's a bastard on the pitch.

    Right now, he's also one of the best buildup players in the league.
    I think overall his flair, dribbling, and passing could all use a significant bump. Right now, he's sorely missed whenever he's injured and I do think that's something that could be added to his profile, as right now in-game he's not regarded as a higher injury risk player, but he does have a long history of injuries and missing matches from them. But regardless, Romero should be starting the game with a higher CA than Dier. Every Spurs fan would agree he's our best defender.

    Speaking of Eric Dier, he's not "either" footed. You could say his left foot is fairly strong, but he clearly prefers his right with passing, dribbling, shooting, and crossing. I honestly can't think of a reason why the game has him listed as "either" footed.

    Again, happy to discuss or dive into the data on any of these points.

  9. 6 hours ago, code-t said:

    It’s weird to just take his stats from this season, the one with the smallest sample size, and the one which is most unrepresentative of his career total.

    The game comes out every year. It attempts to rate players in their attributes based on how they are playing now to create the most accurate simulation of their performance. So it's not really that weird to look at how he's playing now when discussing his attributes, especially if we are discussing increasing an attribute by multiple points as a mid-season update.

    So far this season he's dribbling less and doing it less successfully. That's just a fact.

    Quote


    >But Partey attempts audacious things. All the quotes I’ve listed aren’t talking about a conservative, safe player.

    That's more about "flair" than dribbling. I do agree he should have a healthy flair rating. I'd say 14.

    I get that you're an Arsenal fan and want Partey to be better in the game. But I don't see a case for him being as technical as Odegaard in anything you posted. Instead of just comparing him to two other Arsenal players, who play in different roles, I'd suggest looking at his data and comparing him to other players who you think are comparable and who play in similar roles on other teams. Then you can get a better idea of how he should be rated.

×
×
  • Create New...