Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

46 "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"

About Had_Enough

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

1,111 profile views
  1. In your settings folder and within your settings.xml (name may vary depending on skin but invariably settings is mentioned somewhere) Look for (or add if not present): <!-- (additional) stats colours. used on scout, confidence bars --> <colour name="low stat" red="180" green="160" blue="255" /> <colour name="medium stat" red="147" green="117" blue="255" /> <colour name="good stat" red="120" green="79" blue="255" /> <colour name="excellent stat" red="120" green="0" blue="255" /> That's mine (it's a purplely blue) change the colour val
  2. You've asked this FOUR TIMES, seriously?! One is enough.
  3. I've had debates about Shaw before. IMO he's done ok. I personally think there's plenty of room for improvement but I get the support. He's a young Englishman, had problems with injury and managers, everyone is rooting for him. Does that mean sometimes people go over the top? For me yes but that also works for the negative feedback too. But I agree, I actually amended his PA on my personal db.
  4. I'd have to cross reference Sanchez before and after to see exactly what the CA drop has effected. I'm pretty sure quickness has been though, as it should, whilst some other physicals taking a hit wouldn't surprise me either. He deserves it tbh. This may or may not be news to you or anyone but a little info I learnt re. CA, that might be useful to someone... I might as well mention the scale of Sanchez's CA drop... Bailly's was inevitable with his form, he's been over-rated for a while IMO. His rating is much closer to Jones' though so it's actually more in line with
  5. I've not gone through each player attribute-wise nor am I sure any of this is significant enough to warrant a mention on your OP but.. Bailly & Lindelof's CAs have gone in different directions at exactly the same rate. Arguably Bailly is still over-rated though. Lindelof has a little breathing space now as the justified #1 CB. It's still very tight though amongst the rest. Rashford & Dalot got a decent rise. Valencia, Fosu-Mensah & McTominay a decent drop. Biggest mover in terms of CA is Sanchez getting a significant drop - I went even further on my personal db
  6. No, you guess right & No (I believe). You can't mix and match playable and view only within a country I don't think - you can easily check that though when selecting leagues prior to loading a game up. You won't receive any guidance as concrete as that. Everything works quite efficiently for me but that doesn't mean it will for someone else - a lot of parts in my laptop are brand new (after a HD & motherboard crash). I can imagine older systems will experience a notable difference. So I'd advise only selecting any league regardless of playable or view only necessary to your ga
  7. So you just want to see the 'past winners page'? I really don't know if such a file will have an impact on populating that page or not. Possibly I guess, you might be hard pushed to find anyone applying such a file only not to use it to get a definitive answer on that one though. There's specific and then there's that... It's a weird question tbh but yeah no processing occurs for unselected leagues. To be clear only selected leagues are processed, whether they are playable or view only. Not selected, not processed - applies to relevant questions relating to your first and second
  8. If you didn't select England surely that would be pointless as no leagues would be processed so a file all about making leagues 'processable' would be void. If you mean view only, that's what I described. There will still be processing of results so it would effect speed to some extent - system dependent.
  9. I'd personally say it's pointless and will slow your game (depending on your system's capabilities). Just seems a possibly notable down-turn just to see promotions/relegations. The db mods here for example 'only' focus on league structure and team allocation, i.e. North, South, etc. so it's not even as if the team squad lists are filled out and tbh beyond the Conference, let alone Conf. N/S there's a real problem with the squad accuracy (some of it is understandable given the fluid nature of squads at non-league/non-contract levels). None of this is going to be relevant to/effect a Premie
  10. There's no need to keep asking the same question more than once. Yes there's a problem with it (but I'm not going to bother testing it more myself as I have all the files I need/finished skinning mostly). Try deleting it and reinstalling. If the problem persists, go to the bugs forum and create a thread so the developers are aware. That's the best place. I doubt they even look in this forum.
  11. The quality of some of the goals in the lower leagues, especially English is insane. There's plenty of goals that belong in far higher reaches of the game. I think it'd take a lot of people by surprise, maybe understandably. The big difference is the consistency and ability to repeat said goals at the same rate as professionals or elite stars. If it's the same players, repeating these heroics then I'd say maybe your criticisms are fair... If it's one off wonder strikes, that's not beyond the realms of reality at all.
  12. I don't envy the devs sifting through all this. I'm reading a lot of it and I'm finding it impossible to conclude what is down to the ME or just someone's tactics.
  13. Yeah probably one for the data issues forum, either the Premiership thread or a specific Burnley one (if there is one). Although that area is more for highlighting stuff with researchers than discussing it. OT: Yeah I had a proper chuckle at seeing how Burnley were reviewed yesterday. I have to admit to having admiration for the researcher for his brutality if nothing else. He definitely can't be accused of bias (which is far more likely than negative extremes). It's worth baring in mind though I expect the data was gathered from the researchers a few weeks ago and likely before Bu
  14. Unnecessary. Each team, certainly at that level, have individual researchers. So also misaimed. It's just one person's opinion. (learn to) Use the editor if you feel that strongly.
  • Create New...